honest question DvlDog, don't you think if there was fraud like you list that it would be easy to prove? Trumps legal team has now been in court 40 times and are 1-39 and many of them have been in front of GOP appointed judges and some that were appointed by Trump.
If you read some of the legal proceedings, I know in at least two of them the judge specifically asks if they are alleging fraud and the attorneys say "no". So, in public they are saying there are all kinds of fraud but in a court of law where they can be disbarred for lying, they are honest and say no.
It just seems to me if all of these allegations they are throwing out are true, they should be easy to prove. And affidavits where people say things like, "I saw something that looked shady", are not credible.
I haven’t read the legal briefs that have been submitted. Why wouldn’t they be easy to prove? That’s pretty simple. It requires the State election boards to coordinate with each other validate it. Moreover, fraud would be an admission of failure on the part of the Secretaries of State. They’d effectively be acknowledging they failed at one their primary responsibilities. I’ll break them down:
“Signature matching issues, double voting in surrounding states, dead people voting, ballot harvesting, and a slew of other irregularities.”
You can’t honestly say the voter rolls are up to date. With mass mail-in voting, that alone introduces fraud. There is no way to know who is actually casting the vote. It introduces the opportunity for ballot harvesting and there is no way to really catch that. I know for 100% certainty that my best friend received ballots for 3 states, FL, TX, and MD because he showed me. How they found him in MD is beyond my understanding. Another friend also received ballots from TX and MD. There is no way to validate if he voted in all three or two, respectively, because of the voter rolls. The states, because they’re responsible for conducting their elections and establishing the security of them, but they’d either have to A. Collectively coordinate, or B. Actually look. In either case, they don’t have the resources to do it nor did they. Trump’s legal team has to use the publicly available information to base their lawsuits on or whistleblowers. They’ve allegedly found issues of double voting. That covers ballot harvesting and fraudulent voting.
Dead people voting, back to the voter rolls.
Signature matching: We actually saw the state of PA blocking this ability. How do you challenge ballot signatures from 5-10 feet away? Look at the statistical data coming out of GA on previous elections and this one? They’re statistically light years a part with this one being down. If the state poll watchers, any state for that matter, wasn’t able to do signature matching due to the COVID restrictions, how can we say for certain that ballot harvesting didn’t occur?
The mass unsolicited mail-in voting introduced massive fraud opportunity. Anyone saying it didn’t is a fool. Period.
You’re just going to convince me that that many people voted for Biden when Trump made gains in all but one of 40 key election prediction markers. Minority support, blue collar, specific counties, etc. No doubt he lost ground with suburban women, not to that level. Not to mention that he eclipsed Obama’s record setting vote, and Biden beat him still by however many million? Pffft.
There are a lot of software related irregularities that are worth investigating and a ton of people with sworn affidavits.
Back to the state canvassing and recounts, all they’re doing is re-validating what they already had. Garbage In Garbage Out. They weren’t challenging or attempting to validate the claims Trump’s team has been making.
So, unless Sidney Powell’s lawsuits go somewhere, it’s all over but the crying. I’d just really like to see Voter ID, and if that meant creating transportation vouchers to the DMV for the urban people and olds to get it, fine. Give them a full 2 year election cycle to get their IDs, if they don’t by then? Tough ****. 1 party wants them, the other doesn’t. We all know why.
