Going to be an interesting few weeks of litigation .Anyone on the Left please feel free to answer this as factually as you can.
In down ballot races where Democrat challengers lost to Republican incumbents, Joe Biden's votes over Trump did not carry those races.
Why not?
So Democrat voters in a record turnout election chose to vote for the top of their ticket, yet those same voters could not help the challengers down ballot in their own party against the GOP's incumbents?
Why were the additional votes for Biden over Trump not transferred to the down ballot challengers on the Democrat ticket? Where were Biden's "coattails"? One would have to conclude that those Democrat base voters wanted to send Joe Biden to the White House, but NOT the Congressional support he'll need to undue Trump's agenda?
What happened to those Democrat votes for Joe Biden down ballot? Republican incumbents didn't lose any races, and the GOP actually gained seats against House Democrats. Why didn't Biden's record votes overcoming Trump in crucial swing States translate to his down ballot candidates?
No one on the Left can answer this, but that question deserves a logical answer that doesn't suggest massive fraudulent votes at the top of the ticket.
Open question to anyone on the Left celebrating Biden's historic win, dragging along Democrat challengers against Republicans in the House and Senate with his strong down ballot performance.![]()
Going to be an interesting few weeks of litigation .
Going to be an interesting few weeks of litigation .
Lol. Like you knowI doubt any of these cases go anywhere. They have no legal basis. All state laws have been followed. Go get some tissues.
Get the popcorn readyGuess who will be asking that very question before a Judge?
Trump's legal team.
I doubt any of these cases go anywhere. They have no legal basis. All state laws have been followed. Go get some tissues.
Investigate Ohio. Fine with meSo, we have people still claiming widespread fraud. But just against the POTUS in states he is losing. Interesting. Nobody said "fraud" when Biden was winning Ohio early and Trump rolled past him.
Investigate Ohio. Fine with me
Not when you have evidence indicated otherwise. You think the public knows all the evidence?Or accept the results and don't claim "fraud" when your candidate loses? I like that option better.
Lol. Like you know
Only needs this one.Trump is already 0-2 in legal battles in PA. LOL!
Not when you have evidence indicated otherwise. You think the public knows all the evidence?. Seriously? He warned us about this in June
We’ll see . Should be a fun ride. Libtards still haven’t accepted the 2016 results. Russia Russia Russia.McCarthyism.....great tactic......have they found the 200 names on his list yet? :joy:
We’ll see . Should be a fun ride. Libtards still haven’t accepted the 2016 results. Russia Russia Russia.
I’m saying if they have reason to believe there is fraud then it should be investigated. If there is nothing there , so be it. Why is that hard to understand?So your response was ______________? :joy:
So what you are saying is that you are the same as the people that believed in the "Russia Russia Russia" thing? The same people you ridiculed for years about.
I’m saying if they have reason to believe there is fraud then it should be investigated. If there is nothing there , so be it. Why is that hard to understand?
Not when you have evidence indicated otherwise. You think the public knows all the evidence?. Seriously? He warned us about this in June
That's not what you are saying. You are already believing it hook-line-sinker.
Aren’t you that teacher union freak?That's not what you are saying. You are already believing it hook-line-sinker.
Aren’t you that teacher union freak?
. Ok. This is going to be fun
Yep. It was easy to disprove what you said.
The President isn’t going to tell me evidence or you. He doesn’t have to. Thought that was you. You still scared of the rona?I'm a union supporter, yes.
Are you the guy that believes everything that Twitter or the POTUS tells you without evidence being presented? You must be one damn good juror!
The President isn’t going to tell me evidence or you. He doesn’t have to. Thought that was you. You still scared of the rona?
I’m too lazy and don’t care enough to. It was a yes or no question.Scared of it? Dude, you obviously haven't read any of my posts about it. Please, educate yourself about my stance. Please, ask your conservative friends on here what my views about this "virus" are.
I’m too lazy and don’t care enough to. It was a yes or no question.
You aren’t that interesting.Yeah. It's hard to hit that "search" at the top. :joy: So want to answer my "yes/no"question?
So then, when he presents his "evidence" to the courts and they shoot his case down, you'll be done with it?
YOu know McCarthy was correct? Problem was, there were more communist in the govt.McCarthyism.....great tactic......have they found the 200 names on his list yet? :joy:
YOu know McCarthy was correct? Problem was, there were more communist in the govt.
Thought this was about greg blue trying to tackle Slaton
Can’t wait for the soft trade deals that sell out the American people.
I wasn’t that lucky but I remember watching it. Slaton was my favorite rb. Always felt everytime he touched the ball , he would take it to the house.He got smoked.....I was sitting on the 35 in the GA section when that happened......stunned.
Elites and big tech will get us through nowVersus the trade war that Trump lost??