He liked to burn ****. Now his *** can burn forever.He was 118 miles away from Portland.
Yet people somehow complain about Kyle Rittenhouse being only 20 miles from home and that he was looking for a fight.
You don't read much, not surprising.He was 118 miles away from Portland.
Yet people somehow complain about Kyle Rittenhouse being only 20 miles from home and that he was looking for a fight.
You don't read much, not surprising.
I do have one question, what is the significance of 118 miles? He was not home when they shot him.What is false in my statement Moe?
I do have one question, what is the significance of 118 miles? He was not home when they shot him.
I just read that he wasn't home. Keep defending Rittenhouse though. He deserves everything he gets for displaying terrible judgement if nothing else, so naive and stupid.Where was he Moe? Hiding out at some place? The guy had multiple addresses and has lied about being in the Army.
I just read that he wasn't home. Keep defending Rittenhouse though. He deserves everything he gets for displaying terrible judgement if nothing else, so naive and stupid.
I just read that he wasn't home. Keep defending Rittenhouse though. He deserves everything he gets for displaying terrible judgement if nothing else, so naive and stupid.
I"d take your money on that one.He's going to get acquitted... if he even gets to trial.
He's an idiot and will likely be a convicted felon soon if for nothing else than the firearm charge. I guess you prefer armed vigilantes roaming the streets looking for confrontations.17 year old kid trying to help a town he worked in, attacked by thugs and defended himself and you want to attack him. You are one sick puppy, unless you are very young there is no hope for you
I"d take your money on that one.
17 year old kid trying to help a town he worked in, attacked by thugs and defended himself and you want to attack him. You are one sick puppy, unless you are very young there is no hope for you
You think he's innocent of the weapons charge?I’ll do a ban bet with you on that one.
I didn't think he transported that gun he had across state lines. I thought someone gave him that gun that day (to borrow I would assume).You think he's innocent of the weapons charge?
He's going to get acquitted... if he even gets to trial.
The charge is possession (of a deadly weapon by a person under 18). Thanks for sharing your feelings.I didn't think he transported that gun he had across state lines. I thought someone gave him that gun that day (to borrow I would assume).
Wait, I thought the punk was from Illinois? What was his job in Kenosha?
He's an idiot and will likely be a convicted felon soon if for nothing else than the firearm charge. I guess you prefer armed vigilantes roaming the streets looking for confrontations.
It takes two.No I prefer peaceful streets and if we disagree dialog, it is your side that prefer violence
Umm the possession of a deadly weapon is a misdemeanor I believe...you implied it was a felony chargeThe charge is possession (of a deadly weapon by a person under 18). Thanks for sharing your feelings.
Why be so lazy?Umm the possession of a deadly weapon is a misdemeanor I believe...you implied it was a felony charge
I guess the court link I provided is incorrect...does the Wisconsin court know this.Why be so lazy?
Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley filed the charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, which include one count of first-degree intentional homicide; one count of first-degree reckless homicide; one count of attempted first-degree intentional homicide; two counts of first-degree reckless endangerment and one count of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18, all felonies, according to court records obtained by Fox News.
| Count no. | Statute | Description | Severity | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 940.02(1) | 1st-Degree Reckless Homicide | Felony B | |
| Modifier: | 939.63(1)(b) | Use of a Dangerous Weapon | ||
| 2 | 941.30(1) | 1st-Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety | Felony F | |
| Modifier: | 939.63(1)(b) | Use of a Dangerous Weapon | ||
| 3 | 940.01(1)(a) | 1st-Degree Intentional Homicide | Felony A | |
| Modifier: | 939.63(1)(b) | Use of a Dangerous Weapon | ||
| 4 | 940.01(1)(a) | Attempt 1st-Degree Intentional Homicide | Felony A | |
| Modifier: | 939.63(1)(b) | Use of a Dangerous Weapon | ||
| 5 | 941.30(1) | 1st-Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety | Felony F | |
| Modifier: | 939.63(1)(b) | Use of a Dangerous Weapon | ||
| 6 | 948.60(2)(a) | Possess Dangerous Weapon-Person < 18 | Misd. A |
I didn't see your link. I'll be very surprised if he totally gets off as many claim he will.I guess the court link I provided is incorrect...does the Wisconsin court know this.
Totally gets off means what? Charges dropped? Charges beat in court? Charges reduced? It's all an unknown, but one thing is for sure 1) the DA over-charged (IMO) and 2) he has a hell of a defense teamI didn't see your link. I'll be very surprised if he totally gets off as many claim he will.
I didn't see your link. I'll be very surprised if he totally gets off as many claim he will.
Fortunately they'll be smarter than you and more honest.If some like me is on the jury he is getting off before the trial even starts