Geraldo comes out firing
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
Hey @bamaEER we gonna get that big impeachment vote before Santa leaves a lump of coal in 'yo stocking?
This is not where Nancy Pelosi wanted to be
https://outline.com/MYFHkm
excerpt:
As recently as last spring, Pelosi was frank in outlining the apparently no-win situation she and the Democrats now face. “I’m not for impeachment,” the speaker told The Washington Post Magazine then. “Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.” Asked by Tapper if she had failed her own test, Pelosi replied that it was Republicans who had failed to uphold their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution.
She's screwed bamaEER if you read the whole piece, she just has to figure out which option screws her less? Impeach or don't impeach?
Last edited:
Here's the Democrat's problem @bamaEER
(from the same above linked article)
Just over a year ago, Jerrold Nadler, the House Judiciary chairman whose committee will draft the impeachment articles, sounded a note of extreme caution on impeachment. “You have to be able to think at the beginning of the impeachment process that the evidence is so clear, of offenses so grave, that once you’ve laid out all the evidence, a good fraction of the opposition, the voters, will reluctantly admit to themselves, ‘They have to do it,’’’ he said then. “Otherwise, you have a partisan impeachment, which will tear the country apart.”
This is exactly the corner the Democrats have painted themselves into. Impeaching a President on a purely partisan vote with no solid convincing case that "it must be done" [eyeroll]
(from the same above linked article)
Just over a year ago, Jerrold Nadler, the House Judiciary chairman whose committee will draft the impeachment articles, sounded a note of extreme caution on impeachment. “You have to be able to think at the beginning of the impeachment process that the evidence is so clear, of offenses so grave, that once you’ve laid out all the evidence, a good fraction of the opposition, the voters, will reluctantly admit to themselves, ‘They have to do it,’’’ he said then. “Otherwise, you have a partisan impeachment, which will tear the country apart.”
This is exactly the corner the Democrats have painted themselves into. Impeaching a President on a purely partisan vote with no solid convincing case that "it must be done" [eyeroll]
Last edited:
Just imagine Dave my Man if you were one of those Representatives from a swing district that Trump won in '16, and you had taken up Nancy's promise NOT to pursue an impeachment unless it was bi-partisan?
Can you imagine the pressure those poor folks are under now as Dems draw up these articles to impeach Trump on a purely partisan vote that will get fed into the Republican Senate's paper shredder?
They might want to brush up on those resumes after their re-election losses in 2020?
Last edited:
As we prep for the IG report tomorrow, an interesting tidbit. Comey and Brennan's last tweets were on 11/15. Nothing since. Interesting.
While a 47 percent plurality of Democrat sand Democratic-leaning respondents think Russia poses the greatest immediate threat to the United States, only 10 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaners said they think so. Some 81 percent of Democrats consider Russia unfriendly or an enemy, and 61 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning respondents feel the same way.
You idiots are wrong. While Russia is not our friend, China is our biggest threat.
Posting a poll which proves you guys are ignorant of geopolitical affairs? Perfect. Anyone that doesn’t say China is the greatest immediate threat is a moron.
Do you remember when Mitt Romney said they were our greatest threat during the debate with Zero?
Remember how he laughed that off?
(he also sent troops into Iraq, & Afghanistan, then allowed Isis to take over after taking them out before we secured a SOFA with Iraq)