Vindman admits he falsified a call transcript between Donald Trump & Zelensky

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83
HUGE#Vindman admits he falsified a call transcript btwn @realDonaldTrump & Zelensky

He added a reference fm talking points he made before the call to the final record

Even though Trump never said it on the call

Watch him squirm when he tries to explain this
PRICELESS
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,239
5,168
113
Down goes another "star witness"...

The left is totally wasting America's time and money. They know it. The classic throwing $h!t against a wall and hoping something will stick routine. They don't care though. Their hatred blinds them.

Party of Hate...Today's left.
 

Walter Brennaneer

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
47,312
3,166
113
He is the Lying Liberal Tribe Members hero:
keyser
boom
OM
KKK
Deer Humper
bamaqueer
Soros Eagle
GOP'er Cooper
OP
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
That's not what that exchange was about. It was about where his notes had additional information that was not part of the "transcript" which is really a summary built from the notes of several folks listening to the call. He said that he went through the normal process to try to add that to the transcript, but the decision was made to leave it out. He didn't modify the transcript. His testimony is relative to his notes and the transcript. He had said that the transcript was accurate, and they tried to dive into that given some areas of discrepancy between his notes and the transcript. He's saying that the transcript isn't false, only that he thought it wasn't complete relative to the notes he had in a couple of sections.

If you are going to post other people's attacks, make sure their claims aren't junk. It weakens your argument.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
That's not what that exchange was about. It was about where his notes had additional information that was not part of the "transcript" which is really a summary built from the notes of several folks listening to the call. He said that he went through the normal process to try to add that to the transcript, but the decision was made to leave it out. He didn't modify the transcript. His testimony is relative to his notes and the transcript. He had said that the transcript was accurate, and they tried to dive into that given some areas of discrepancy between his notes and the transcript. He's saying that the transcript isn't false, only that he thought it wasn't complete relative to the notes he had in a couple of sections.

If you are going to post other people's attacks, make sure their claims aren't junk. It weakens your argument.
Glad to see you’re applying this level of responsibility evenly these last two weeks. :rolleyes:
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
Glad to see you’re applying this level of responsibility evenly these last two weeks. :rolleyes:
I don't have the time to read everything on the board. Kudos to you if you do. I happened to hear this exchange live, and the clip is cut to make it look like something it was not. I wanted to point that out.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,602
821
113
That's not what that exchange was about. It was about where his notes had additional information that was not part of the "transcript" which is really a summary built from the notes of several folks listening to the call. He said that he went through the normal process to try to add that to the transcript, but the decision was made to leave it out. He didn't modify the transcript. His testimony is relative to his notes and the transcript. He had said that the transcript was accurate, and they tried to dive into that given some areas of discrepancy between his notes and the transcript. He's saying that the transcript isn't false, only that he thought it wasn't complete relative to the notes he had in a couple of sections.

If you are going to post other people's attacks, make sure their claims aren't junk. It weakens your argument.
The transcript was done by the NSA from call recordings.
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
The transcript was done by the NSA from call recordings.
Call recordings of presidential calls? I thought that ended with Nixon. The process as I understand it is a recreation of the call from notes from several listeners on staff.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,509
3,177
113
Call recordings of presidential calls? I thought that ended with Nixon. The process as I understand it is a recreation of the call from notes from several listeners on staff.

You are right, so why would someone who was not on the call try and add something that he read, but did not hear live, when the ones who took the call notes agreed was the best possible transcript?

In the HR world, this is called an observation vs. judgement... This entire hearing is summed up pretty well in this context. It is all judgement and NO observation....but we continue to go down this path.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,239
5,168
113
You are right, so why would someone who was not on the call try and add something that he read, but did not hear live, when the ones who took the call notes agreed was the best possible transcript?

In the HR world, this is called an observation vs. judgement... This entire hearing is summed up pretty well in this context. It is all judgement and NO observation....but we continue to go down this path.

Excellent analysis.
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
You are right, so why would someone who was not on the call try and add something that he read, but did not hear live, when the ones who took the call notes agreed was the best possible transcript?

In the HR world, this is called an observation vs. judgement... This entire hearing is summed up pretty well in this context. It is all judgement and NO observation....but we continue to go down this path.
Vindman was on the call.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,602
821
113
Call recordings of presidential calls? I thought that ended with Nixon. The process as I understand it is a recreation of the call from notes from several listeners on staff.
The NSA records everything. I told you where the transcript came from.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,509
3,177
113
Vindman was on the call.

and everyone disagreed with him. He heard what he wanted to hear and he got checked at the door. You do realize that first person accounts are impacted by personal bias? Even a military rock star...
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
I don't have the time to read everything on the board. Kudos to you if you do. I happened to hear this exchange live, and the clip is cut to make it look like something it was not. I wanted to point that out.
Review about anything posted by the left as a “bombshell” posts on this board and it’s out of context nonsense. Seemed funny you picked this one.