LOL......This tells us a lot....

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
No, moron, I’m not confused. You have been misled, you displayed your idiocy, doubled down on your idiocy and now your so friggin stupid you don’t realize you have been misled.

You trumpers are proudly stupid.
Hey derp, try english dipshit.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
They’ll say lacking any evidence that “the testimony has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt, Trump,...Orange Man Bad, Orange Man Bad, Orange Man Bad, and Orange Man Bad‘d”. It will be a party line vote and the Senate will destroy this **** show. The Dems in the House get their win for the kook fringe, they’ll beat the drum through the election, and hope like all hell this will be enough to beat Orange Man.

It’s clear through every witness that has been on the hill testifying. Trump did in fact want investigations occurring on both the 2016 Crowdstrike stuff and on the Burisma Biden stuff. Trump was 100% within the legal purview of his office of the Presidency, following the treaty signed by Clinton, to request the Ukraine work with Barr on both (backed up by the transcript). The transcript further illustrates there was no quid pro quo, no bribery, and outside of the political optics, nothing done by the administration was illegal. This was also backed up by President of Ukraine and the timelines of events. Aid was provided within the legal timelines required. Further, aid was delayed as evidenced by the testimony delayed by Schiff in disclosure as being based on rationale completely justifiable.

It will also show later down the road, the improper disclosing of information to persons not cleared with “need to know” information.

Very well written and totally accurate. Know what I didn't read though?
An impeachable offense.

We'll see, but this was still very well written. At least someone is paying attention to the truth.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,636
2,853
113
I find it funny that no one is allowed to criticize military personnel on the left , but the left can criticize all military personnel on the right ....just a observation...
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
Very well written and totally accurate. Know what I didn't read though?
An impeachable offense.

We'll see, but this was still very well written. At least someone is paying attention to the truth.

Dumb people have problems connecting points .......sorry if I hurt your feelings with that.
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
I find it funny that no one is allowed to criticize military personnel on the left , but the left can criticize all military personnel on the right ....just a observation...

Criticize all day long. Just don’t smear the guy for no reason. He testified under oath. If he lied, put his *** in jail.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
How can I prove these bs conspiracy theories wrong. Damn you pulled that straight out of atl’s playbook.

If you're interested in trying out for the Olympic world record in the 40 meter dash, country can train you.

Here try this one, let's see how fast you can run?

Among all the witnesses called by Schiff to testify as to their first hand, second hand, third, or non existent knowledge of what they knew regarding Trump's "bribery" or "extortion" of Ukrainian President Zelenski, can you tell the board how many of them have actually mentioned the word "bribery" or extortion" in their accounts?

Just give us a number from zero up to how many have been called to testify?

Ready? (stopwatch is) OK...now ....GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Look at @Original Mountaineer1 haulin' ***!!!!!!! Keep runnin' you might catch @countryroads89 ....she's still runnin' from that one too! [winking]
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
Dumb people have problems connecting points .......sorry if I hurt your feelings with that.

I don't have "feelings" to hurt because I look at facts. Having said that, I'll 100% guarantee YOU cannot "connect points" to demonstrate either a "quid pro quo" or "bribery" or "extortion" on the part of Trump to Zelensky regarding military aid to Ukraine.

Matter of fact I'd 100% guarantee you can't even admit Trump gave them more lethal military aid than Obama, and Obama's aid was actually threatened to be withheld by Joe "quid pro quo" Biden unless the Prosecutor investigating his Son's sweetheart deal with a corrupt Ukrainian energy company was fired.

Well son-of-a-*****...he was fired!

Can you explain that?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,366
3,521
113
How can I prove these bs conspiracy theories wrong. Damn you pulled that straight out of atl’s playbook.
What is the BS conspiracy? I can add in another fact, Trump has been a better President for Ukraine than Obama was. Trump actually got weapons they needed to fight the Russians with. Trump also wasn’t at the helm when Crimea was annexed. Is all of that ******** as well? I’m sure all of the was to Russia’s benefit since you fvcking morons are still hanging onto Trump being Putin’s puppet.

Enjoy. The next month or so is going to be a hell of a ride. And keep in mind. Impeachment vote plays right into the narrative and will 100% support the IG’s findings. You all have been baited into moving forward with this impeachment. We’ve literally been baiting you to do it for 6 months since you all had “10 counts of obstruction”. This supports the narrative that will be played out for the American people who aren’t infected with TDS, that you all will stop at nothing to defeat him. Great sound bites you all have provided along the way to support the narrative as well. You all got boxed in and literally have nowhere to turn now because you listened to your crazy fringe. Checkmate.
 
Last edited:

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,865
287
83
“Did anyone ever ask you to bribe or extort anyone at any time during your time in the White House?" Devin Nunes, R-Calif., asked at one point in Tuesday's hearing.
Former National Security Council (NSC) aide Tim Morrison: "No."
U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker: “No."
Well, there you have it lol. Meaningless line of questioning. The POTUS was in charge of bribery and extortion. Mulvaney confessed a while back, remember?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
Well, there you have it lol. Meaningless line of questioning. The POTUS was in charge of bribery and extortion. Mulvaney confessed a while back, remember?
Its going to be fun watching the next poor democrat try to run the White House using the new TDS standard. 2036 isnt too far away.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,377
4,595
113
How do you know he doesn't meet body fat standards? I assume they still use that method when GI's do not meet height and weight chart listings.

Sir you first go by appearance in uniform. His face is fat with multiple chins. His girth around his mid section is huge and soft. Many pictures confirm this. If we are being honest it's clear he wore a larger uniform to hide it. Just from experience I can easy see he's at least 20 pounds over his max weight for his height. Then you would break out the tape and measure his neck and waist. Again from experience I can see that's going to come in around 30 % or more. 18 % is the max. If is face was thinner and his waist was smaller then being thick every else wouldn't be a problem. How he gets by with it is a civilian is righting his Evaulations in his current billet and they pen whip that stuff. So like DD said you can be a muscle bound guy that gets screwed by the height and weight standards but that tub of lard had more chins than a Chinese telephone book.

If this was a normal hearing wearing his uniform would have been appropriate. But since it's a political impeachment inquiry he should have worn his actual uniform of the day for his current billet which is a suit. There is a reason military members are prohibited from wearing their uniform to court. If you see one doing so they are breaking rules and regulations that can subject them to punishment under the UCMJ.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
BREAKING: Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg says in a statement:

“I was on the much-reported July 25 call between President Donald Trump and President Zelensky … I heard nothing wrong or improper on the call. I had and have no concerns.”
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
BREAKING: Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg says in a statement:

“I was on the much-reported July 25 call between President Donald Trump and President Zelensky … I heard nothing wrong or improper on the call. I had and have no concerns.”

Yet intelligent Americans have read the transcript and know otherwise. LMAO!

The Dems already have sufficient evidence against trump. They are now moving to gather more incriminating evidence, from Sondland, against Mulvaney and Pompeo. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Yet intelligent Americans have read the transcript and know otherwise. LMAO!

The Dems already have sufficient evidence against trump. They are now moving to gather more incriminating evidence, from Sondland, against Mulvaney and Pompeo. HAHAHAHAHAHA.

Get back on your meds.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Sondland says that Pompeo gave him "the green light" to brief Zelensky and ask him to announce investigations. But he says that Joe Biden did not come up.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Sondland testifies President Trump never told him directly aid was conditioned on meetings
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Sondland says, again, that he does not remember ever mentioning the Bidens with regard to investigations, only Burisma.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Sondland says, again, "President Trump never told me directly that the aid was tied to that statement," Sondland says, adding that Trump only said he wants "no quid pro quo," and wanted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to "do the right thing."
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
Yet intelligent Americans have read the transcript and know otherwise. LMAO!

The Dems already have sufficient evidence against trump. They are now moving to gather more incriminating evidence, from Sondland, against Mulvaney and Pompeo. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
What did they read in the transcript?
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Sondland: "My testimony is I never heard from President Trump that aid was conditioned on an announcement of elections" [By elections, that appears he misspoke and means 'investigations.']
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Sondland says he called Trump on Sept. 9 He says he asked Trump essentially: "What do you want?" "I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing," Trump said, according to Sondland.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
I didn't get a chance to hear the testimony today, but based on what I've read and snippets of what I've heard on the way home from work, this was a disaster today for Dems. Jim Jordan eviscerated Sondland's opening testimony, and I heard the President today saying he told Sondland directly "I want nothing" tell Zelensky to do the right thing!

Sondland agreed that's exactly what the President told him!

Wow!
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I didn't get a chance to hear the testimony today, but based on what I've read and snippets of what I've heard on the way home from work, this was a disaster today for Dems. Jim Jordan eviscerated Sondland's opening testimony, and I heard the President today saying he told Sondland directly "I want nothing" tell Zelensky to do the right thing!

Sondland agreed that's exactly what the President told him!

Wow!


Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,366
3,521
113
Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!
Chefs kiss!
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
458
0
Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!

Still dodging @DvlDog4WVU question I see.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!

Because Ken Starr sees this sham and Shiftforbrains as already being decided.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!

Alright country...why don't you correct me with the exact testimony Sundland gave today when he was asked directly if he had any orders from the President for a "quid pro quo" from Ukraine?

Quote back to me how he answered that direct question? That's what I heard on the Sirius Patriot radio network this evening on my way home sitting in traffic on I285 as they were playing snippets of the testimony today.

Were they wrong?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
@countryroads89 Here is what I heard Congressman Jim Jordan say on Sirius radio on my way home this evening.


This is what YOU said:
Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!

So compare what I heard and what Congressman Jordan actually said about Sondland's testimony, and what I was told wrong to what YOU heard Sondland testify to today that contradicts what I heard?

Can you?
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
So @countryroads89 ...it's your assessment Trump had a bad day correct? So tell me what the "quid pro quo" was that was revealed and will contain the articles of impeachment he'll face? What are the facts? What convicts him?

I heard the heart of the Democrat's case was pulled apart like a loaf of freshly baked warm bread. Was that wrong?

OK...correct the record.

(keep in mind the more you avoid me the more proof I have of you losing our bet)
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
so @countryroads89 , was Ambassador Sondland's "presumption" of Trump's quid pro quo the bad day you think Trump had?

What are the facts counter to this brutal beatdown of Ambassador Sondland today?


Why can't you answer me? Too confident of your winning our bet, and you don't want to jinx yourself?[eyeroll]
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
@countryroads89 ....what case did the Democrats make today for Trump's quid pro quo for Ukraine?

Spell it out for me here since I've been misinformed. Remember?

Hahahahaha! See, that is your problem. You rely on others to tell you what to believe.

Yeah, you go ahead and think this was a bad day for Dems. LMAO! Did you hear Ken Starr said they should be drafting articles of impeachment as the testimony unfolded? Yeah, that Ken Starr.

hahahahahahahaha!


So tell me what YOU heard today (assuming you listened to the hearings) that contradicts what I was told?

Inform me of the Truth I'm missing?

Why can't you answer me?

Isn't it obvious what I'm doing atl? Are you that much of a f'vckin' moron that you don't notice me running away from your questions?

I do see you runnin' country, mostly your mouth... but no facts. Why not?