LOL......This tells us a lot....

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
It’s 100% appropriate. I agree.

it’s also 100% the epitome of being a douche. Anyone who has served knows these types of jackasses. But I agree, it’s 100% appropriate, just not necessary.
Exactly.....but blowhards like country wouldn't have a clue about things like that. It is appropriate but also not inappropriate if you don't.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
I'll admit that it struck me as odd that he did it, but he was polite about it. I'll freely admit that I'm not wise in the ways of these things in formal hearings. Maybe this is something that needs to be kept clear in the record.

Rather than demanding what he should be called, he should be more concerned about who he actually works for? Seems to me he was more concerned about protecting the President of Ukraine than backing the President of the United States (his boss).

Even if he disagreed with our policy as a member of the Security council, it's not his call to make. As an Officer in the U.S. Armed Forces, he more than anyone else should recognize the chain of command and who the Commander-in-Chief is?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,377
4,595
113
It is the appropriate and proper thing to do when he is testifying in front of Congress and WEARING HIS UNIFORM.

********, you're a f'ucking moron.

Damn you're a moron. His a uniform of the day is a suit and this is a political impeachment so no he should not have worn his uniform bringing discredit on it. It's the same reason military members are prohibited from wearing their uniform to court. If it was a normal hearing it would have been ok.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
Damn you're a moron. His a uniform of the day is a suit and this is a political impeachment so no he should not have worn his uniform bringing discredit on it. It's the same reason military members are prohibited from wearing their uniform to court. If it was a normal hearing it would have been ok.
He sat there in uniform sniveling to Jim Jordan for getting called out for telling everyone about his complaibt except his chain of command.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Exactly.....but blowhards like country wouldn't have a clue about things like that. It is appropriate but also not inappropriate if you don't.

It is inappropriate. One of the other members had to explain that no disrespect was intended and Lt Col Vindman acknowledged.

JFC you’re a moron.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
He sat there in uniform sniveling to Jim Jordan for getting called out for telling everyone about his complaibt except his chain of command.

We can't hear who he went to in the IC community with his "concerns" because it would expose the whistleblower he's never heard of. [eyeroll]
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
We can't hear who he went to in the IC community with his "concerns" because it would expose the whistleblower he's never heard of. [eyeroll]
A real patriot wouldn't hide behind Adam Shiffs beard.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
A real patriot wouldn't hide behind Adam Shiffs beard.

I said earlier Dave, once they tell one lie, they'd better make sure everyone else is on the same page because they have to tell a whole lot more lies to cover the original lie and pretty soon they lose track of so many lies being told to cover up so many other lies.

Case in point here.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
696
0
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
LMAO! Some ***** who never served is calling a Purple Heart recipient a douchebag.

hey board, let that sink in.
Whatever he did to get a purple heart had nothing to do with his decision to declassify information amd share it with his friend Eric Ciaramella.

The real comedy is you calling anyone a *****.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Whatever he did to get a purple heart had nothing to do with his decision to declassify information amd share it with his friend Eric Ciaramella.

The real comedy is you calling anyone a *****.


Hahahaha. You *****, calling a Purple Heart recipient a douchebag.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,377
4,595
113
Whatever he did to get a purple heart had nothing to do with his decision to declassify information amd share it with his friend Eric Ciaramella.

The real comedy is you calling anyone a *****.

Was riding in a humvee that hit an I.E.D. no bloodshed required. You guys decide.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
Whatever he did to get a purple heart had nothing to do with his decision to declassify information amd share it with his friend Eric Ciaramella.

The real comedy is you calling anyone a *****.

He also had no right to be "concerned" about anything the President of the Unites States decided regarding our policy with Ukraine. No one asked him to be "concerned" with anything except carrying out his boss' policy.

He is not the "organizer" of US foreign policy, the President is, and he serves at the pleasure & will of the President.

How is this even arguable?
 
Last edited:

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
and you pussed out meeting me at a football game a couple years ago.

hahahahaha!

*****.
Keep telling that lie. What kinda fahgut wants to meet a dude at a football game? I guess some people need a crowd to protect them.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
LMAO! Poor dave, the entire board saw it. They saw you puss out.

hahahahahaha!
Saw what? That I am not interestes in meeting up with you at a football game? The whole board was thinking "damn Im glad dave had to let princess down instead of me".
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
31,055
1,787
113
Rather than demanding what he should be called, he should be more concerned about who he actually works for? Seems to me he was more concerned about protecting the President of Ukraine than backing the President of the United States (his boss).

Even if he disagreed with our policy as a member of the Security council, it's not his call to make. As an Officer in the U.S. Armed Forces, he more than anyone else should recognize the chain of command and who the Commander-in-Chief is?
Vindman was sold to the public by the Democrats as someone unimpeachable — nonpartisan, objective, and in his case a decorated war veteran and the ultimate immigrant success story, in reference to his background as a 1979 Ukrainian Jewish refugee emigrating from the old Soviet Union.
It is also being reported that Vindman worked as a registered foreign agent for Ukraine.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,877
113
Vindman was sold to the public by the Democrats as someone unimpeachable — nonpartisan, objective, and in his case a decorated war veteran and the ultimate immigrant success story, in reference to his background as a 1979 Ukrainian Jewish refugee emigrating from the old Soviet Union.
It is also being reported that Vindman worked as a registered foreign agent for Ukraine.

He also was under consideration as Ukraine's Defense Minister, and he claims to know nothing about Burisma (even though he's a so called "expert" on Ukrainian matters) [eyeroll]