Trump says he will testify

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Has there been a witness who didn't witness some portion of this mess? There are so many people involved in Trump's months long back channel diplomacy that pretty much everyone knows what went on and can vouch for it. How many more Trump associates will go to prison? the list keeps getting longer.

There haven't been any witnesses, quit calling them that. It's only a self help group discussing orange man bad, and said man took their ball away from them. They aren't in charge of foreign policy, the president is.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
285
83
There haven't been any witnesses, quit calling them that. It's only a self help group discussing orange man bad, and said man took their ball away from them. They aren't in charge of foreign policy, the president is.
Keep denying reality. Since when is Trump asking a foreign prez to investigate Trump's political rival in exchange for withheld military aid considered "foreign policy"? Many consider it bribery not "foreign policy".
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Since that American citizen Biden, Kerry, Pelosi, all have their children taking bribes from these countries, yes. everyone of their children are making money off of their name because the US is giving them way more money. That's the real quid pro quo and idiots like you, are for it.
Ok. Good to know you are OK with POTUS asking foreign governments to investigate American citizens. I'm sure you will maintain that thinking when President Lib starts doing it.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Keep denying reality. Since when is Trump asking a foreign prez to investigate Trump's political rival in exchange for withheld military aid considered "foreign policy"? Many consider it bribery not "foreign policy".

  1. Noone that has testified has directly evidenced such events
  2. The aid was supplied within legal deadlines
  3. Ukraine felt no pressure
  4. There was no quid pro quo in any call
  5. Ukraine released documents showing that Trump was right, it did need investigated
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,508
7,316
113
Ok. Good to know you are OK with POTUS asking foreign governments to investigate American citizens. I'm sure you will maintain that thinking when President Lib starts doing it.
You mean like the AAP who started the one against Trump? They already did, only Trump never did anything. you lost the election, go win the next one.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Ok. Good to know you are OK with POTUS asking foreign governments to investigate American citizens. I'm sure you will maintain that thinking when President Lib starts doing it.

Wait until the first Republican House starts impeachment hearings day 1 of president lib. It will be lit.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Does he have the right to confront his accuser? The obama plant? Fund raiser? What is the ***** Schiff afraid of?
A) He's his own accuser. He released the transcript. B) Not in the investigation phase. Tell Senate Republicans to undo all whistleblower protections. Same protections that brought Fast and Furious and IRS scandals to light under the last admin. Odd you would wanna throw all of those away for something you don't even find impeachable. All just because of the fragile ego of our President. :joy::joy::joy:
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,508
7,316
113
  1. Noone that has testified has directly evidenced such events
  2. The aid was supplied within legal deadlines
  3. Ukraine felt no pressure
  4. There was no quid pro quo in any call
  5. Ukraine released documents showing that Trump was right, it did need investigated
Did Ambassador Yousuckit, complain when obama gave them MRE's and toilet paper?
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,508
7,316
113
A) He's his own accuser. He released the transcript. B) Not in the investigation phase. Tell Senate Republicans to undo all whistleblower protections. Same protections that brought Fast and Furious and IRS scandals to light under the last admin. Odd you would wanna throw all of those away for something you don't even find impeachable. All just because of the fragile ego of our President. :joy::joy::joy:
I don't care about his ego, the last President was the worst thing to ever happen to this country.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,927
4,321
113
Ok. Good to know you are OK with POTUS asking foreign governments to investigate American citizens. I'm sure you will maintain that thinking when President Lib starts doing it.

If this is a defense of Obama because of the two I.G. reports coming out and Durham's work it's a weak one. Neither is a crime. It's what laws were broken while conducting them that's going to hurt your cause of getting the orange one.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,508
7,316
113
Huh? Can you translate your boomer gibberish?
I'll slow down. AAP= Affirmative Action President. The obama admin tried to undermine Trump's campaign, by having Ukraine feed a bunch of crap to the dems. it will never be proven but he was at the center of it. it's the one thing Marxists do.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
285
83
  1. Noone that has testified has directly evidenced such events
  2. The aid was supplied within legal deadlines
  3. Ukraine felt no pressure
  4. There was no quid pro quo in any call
  5. Ukraine released documents showing that Trump was right, it did need investigated
I think you got #2 right but it was withheld while Trump sought a "favor" (in the call). 1 out of 5 isn't bad and the one you got right is also part of the bribery attempt. nice job.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
it was withheld while Trump sought a "favor" (in the call).

There is nothing but rumor and innuendo tying those together, mostly sourced from the NYT. It was a brand new administration with a political newcomer. It's much more likely they were vetting Zelensky for a month or two.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,927
4,321
113
There is nothing but rumor and innuendo tying those together, mostly sourced from the NYT. It was a brand new administration with a political newcomer. It's much more likely they were vetting Zelensky for a month or two.


 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
285
83
There is nothing but rumor and innuendo tying those together, mostly sourced from the NYT. It was a brand new administration with a political newcomer. It's much more likely they were vetting Zelensky for a month or two.
Sondland's aide who testified Friday has first hand knowledge of Trump's shady scheme and is singing. OMB employees (and others probably) will rat out Trump and his chief of staff regarding the aid hold up. The only question is how many are willing to lie for Trump. Many are stepping up and telling the truth instead of going to jail for Trump. 8 witnesses this week, relax and enjoy the dirt reveal.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,992
6,727
113
You are smart enough, others on here aren't, that this is a sham. When it moves to the Senate, the WH will be allowed to present a defense.

They can't even decide on a charge to put on an impeachment article they can vote on! They keep changing what they're looking for in their "inquiry"?

Give me a break.

If they ever get around to voting out articles of impeachment, no one right now has any idea what those would be? Who holds an impeachment inquiry without a clue of what they're "inquiring" about?

Ans: Desperate Leftists who have nothing else to run on.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,992
6,727
113
Sondland's aide who testified Friday has first hand knowledge of Trump's shady scheme and is singing. OMB employees (and others probably) will rat out Trump and his chief of staff regarding the aid hold up. The only question is how many are willing to lie for Trump. Many are stepping up and telling the truth instead of going to jail for Trump. 8 witnesses this week, relax and enjoy the dirt reveal.

Everyone knows how Trump "bribed" Ukraine except the Ukrainians and Trump! [eyeroll]

Moe's waiting for Schiff to add "collusion" and "obstruction" from Mueller's report to his hearings. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Sondland's aide who testified Friday has first hand knowledge of Trump's shady scheme and is singing. OMB employees (and others probably) will rat out Trump and his chief of staff regarding the aid hold up. The only question is how many are willing to lie for Trump. Many are stepping up and telling the truth instead of going to jail for Trump. 8 witnesses this week, relax and enjoy the dirt reveal.

You've got him now!
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,992
6,727
113
You've got him now!

Trump is so smooth, he pulled this whole thing off without anyone else knowing about it, but now somehow everyone else knows about it!

Damn he good!
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,992
6,727
113
You seem to ignore everything going on in DC for some reason. Keep wishing it will stop.

Hey moe, when do you suppose Schiff's committee gets around to "inquiring" about Mueller's report on Trump's "collusion" and "obstruction"?

Isn't there enough in that report to impeach him on that alone?