Did a hearing start today or something?
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
How exciting... two guys that no direct contact with Trump, and only testify to hersay.
Thrilling!
Tweet from Aaron Rupar (@atrupar)
Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) Tweeted:
Kent explains a key point: Despite what Republicans would have you believe, Biden's policy in Ukraine was all about *rooting out corruption,* not encouraging it. https://t.co/qEiZZdLlq6
Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) Tweeted:
Kent explains a key point: Despite what Republicans would have you believe, Biden's policy in Ukraine was all about *rooting out corruption,* not encouraging it. https://t.co/qEiZZdLlq6
The different views of different people watching the exact same event are intriguing.
Tried a case. Newspaper sent a reporter to watch it and file daily reports. At the end of a week of testimony, i stopped by to see my parents on Saturday. My mother said she was sorry my trial was going so poorly. I was shocked. Told her she was wrong, it was going great. She said, no, the newspaper has been reporting every day how the other side is whipping your witnesses. That afternoon, the other side called and offered a settlement of $500,000, which was excellent value.
Points? Media may not get it right, even though they try. Different people often see the same testimony differently. Most relevant, each witness typically offers only a few worthy items of evidence, but rarely does any one witness provide the whole enchilada for either side. My Cousin Vinny made a good point when he told his relative that a case is made up of building blocks that the lawyer uses to build his/her case, and, hopefully, those building blocks are solid. It’s the totality of the evidence that one should look to, after hearing from all witnesses, as there will usually be conflicts of testimony from various witnesses (being human, memories will differ), and a person can then form their own opinion as to who is credible on the important points.
Tried a case. Newspaper sent a reporter to watch it and file daily reports. At the end of a week of testimony, i stopped by to see my parents on Saturday. My mother said she was sorry my trial was going so poorly. I was shocked. Told her she was wrong, it was going great. She said, no, the newspaper has been reporting every day how the other side is whipping your witnesses. That afternoon, the other side called and offered a settlement of $500,000, which was excellent value.
Points? Media may not get it right, even though they try. Different people often see the same testimony differently. Most relevant, each witness typically offers only a few worthy items of evidence, but rarely does any one witness provide the whole enchilada for either side. My Cousin Vinny made a good point when he told his relative that a case is made up of building blocks that the lawyer uses to build his/her case, and, hopefully, those building blocks are solid. It’s the totality of the evidence that one should look to, after hearing from all witnesses, as there will usually be conflicts of testimony from various witnesses (being human, memories will differ), and a person can then form their own opinion as to who is credible on the important points.
Have you done any homework on the whistleblower and his lawyers yet ? Sheeeeeew
VVV tjebarr VVV
Exactly what you should do for posting a Jim "OSU Wrestling scandal " Jordan video
So he doesn't know who the whistle blower is but he's ready to hold Republicans in contempt if they name him?
What if they get the name wrong?
Just because his foreign policy doesn't match deep state's, doesn't mean it's corrupt.
Oh, and beating the same horse:
- Trump has given Ukraine more than blankets to beat the Russians - Trump's Ukraine policy is better than Obama's
- Ukraine didn't know the funds were withheld - hard to extort or quid pro quo when you don't know what you're supposed to do
- They were still delivered within the time period allowed by law