Sighs and gasps

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
458
0
It's an honor to be so deep in your head.


Tell us more about how the big bad mod hurt you.

 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
[laughing]
Agreed. It IS funny to watch Trumpers that denied a quid pro quo for so long, even tho anyone with functioning brain could see from the memo the WHITE HOUSE released that was exactly what was going on, now switching to the OF COURSE TRUMP DID IT, BUT THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH IT defense.
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
Agreed. It IS funny to watch Trumpers that denied a quid pro quo for so long, even tho anyone with functioning brain could see from the memo the WHITE HOUSE released that was exactly what was going on, now switching to the OF COURSE TRUMP DID IT, BUT THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH IT defense.

How long until we see Trump personally go after Bill Taylor for telling the truth
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Now we now why Trump was trying to stop Taylor from testifying and why the lynching comments were necessary

Taylor's entire opening statement is second and third hand hearsay, and Taylor's or Sondland's suppositions.

You've got him now!
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Agreed. It IS funny to watch Trumpers that denied a quid pro quo for so long, even tho anyone with functioning brain could see from the memo the WHITE HOUSE released that was exactly what was going on, now switching to the OF COURSE TRUMP DID IT, BUT THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH IT defense.

^^^ This is your brain on meth
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Agreed. It IS funny to watch Trumpers that denied a quid pro quo for so long, even tho anyone with functioning brain could see from the memo the WHITE HOUSE released that was exactly what was going on, now switching to the OF COURSE TRUMP DID IT, BUT THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH IT defense.
This is where Biff and Bifftards come out and say ‘yes he did this and it’s not illegal’.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113

Her Barr...if we're supposed to care about these revelations...why aren't we being allowed to hear them testifying?

From article:

"according to sources in the room for the testimony."

So we're supposed to believe this damning testimony was offered, but no one is available to corroborate it, verify it, and there's of course no transcript available certifying it. [eyeroll]

Well since we have no independent verification of the story....tell 'ya what I'm gonna do barr...



Until this is proven during an impeachment trial....I prefer to treat it as hearsay. Want me (and other posters) to care? Put a name to the testimony.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113
Taylor's entire opening statement is second and third hand hearsay, and Taylor's or Sondland's suppositions.

You've got him now!

Exactly! Why aren't we holding an impeachment vote right now? What else do we need to get this thing over to the Senate and get Trump convicted?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113
Umm no, it's not. Shows how stupid you are.

This is so true! On the same day barr posts for us this so alleged "smoking gun" House Intel Chairman Schiff says he "needs more time" to investigate his case against the obviously guilty Trump. [eyeroll]

Now he's saying they may hold public hearings sometime around Christmas...as if everyone wants their Holiday cheer spoiled by his three ring circus.

Hey atl...I'm a good ringmaster!
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113
Funny, his opening statement wasn't released like everyone else's has.

*GASP*

Also the "gasps" in the room while he was reading his testimony were all anonymously reported. What on earth is the reason to shield the public from whoever said that? You'd think those sources would be willing to stand behind what they told this Politico reporter? Why ask for anonymity on something as insignificant as that? (how folks reacted to this testimony?)
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113
The real American people, like myself, living in one of the critical swing states see this for what it truly is. A lynching. Stop the lynching now.

No...let 'em keep it up. We'll get to hear this testimony again, then we get to hear the cross examination from the President's defense team. We will be able to "gasp" and "sigh" and figure out who's telling the Truth based on the facts.

Then we go vote.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113

You honestly think this goes to a full House hearing for a possible impeachment, then on to the Senate for a trial, without anyone even asking if Biden's activity over there is off limits?

[roll]
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Isn't Taylor the one who first heard of quid pro quo from the press? I get my resistance rebels mixed up.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113
What if it's proven Trump was withholding Congressional approved aide to Ukraine until they agreed to investigate Biden?

There's a chronological problem with your question.

A) It assumes there was no reason to withhold aid (false)...even Biden threatened to withhold aid.

b) It assumes the aid was withheld, but there's been no corresponding investigation of exactly what Biden was up to or how his son was paid millions? Urkraine eventually got all the aid Congress appropriated but we still don't know what Biden's role was or why his Son was placed onto Burisma's board?

A Senate trail following an impeachment vote should clear all of this up 'ya think?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,840
8,163
113
Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North Carolina all going for Trump again in 2020.

Don't you find it interesting how we're being told essentially chapter and verse of what these so called "brave patriotic" career service diplomats are telling the House intel committee, but it's so important for us to hear, we only get it by second hand non corroborated sources or without an actual transcript we can cross reference later? Really important huh?
 
Last edited:

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
You honestly think this goes to a full House hearing for a possible impeachment, then on to the Senate for a trial, without anyone even asking if Biden's activity over there is off limits?

[roll]

They have been asking
 
WV Sports

Latest

  1. 01 WV Sports Cam Cook’s experience creating opportunities in WVU backfield
  2. 02 WV Sports Inside the numbers on expected WVU starting QB Michael Hawkins
  3. 03 WV Sports Hodge sees powerful WVU brand as major recruiting advantage
  4. 04 WV Sports WVU freshman WR Landon Drumm making strong impression
  5. 05 WV Sports Report: Michael Hawkins to start at quarterback for West Virginia