And CJ Roberts would preside.that if it goes before the Senate trial, then the Presidents attorney can subpoena anyone and and question anyone they want...and the GOP controlled Senate can dictate what is fair game to ask about?
That would be interesting
that if it goes before the Senate trial, then the Presidents attorney can subpoena anyone and and question anyone they want...and the GOP controlled Senate can dictate what is fair game to ask about?
That would be interesting
So the defense cant call witnesses? You sure?
Well, you did. He gets to present a defense and the senate can subpeona anyone to appear. You really shouldnt call anyone a moron.I didn’t say they couldn’t call witnesses. Why are you such a moron?
Well, you did. He gets to present a defense and the senate can subpeona anyone to appear. You really shouldnt call anyone a moron.
that if it goes before the Senate trial, then the Presidents attorney can subpoena anyone and and question anyone they want...and the GOP controlled Senate can dictate what is fair game to ask about?
That would be interesting
LOL! No.
So the GOP controlled Senate wouldn’t control the process...are you that stupid? Don’t answer, it’s a rhetorical question.LOL! No.
So the GOP controlled Senate wouldn’t control the process...are you that stupid? Don’t answer, it’s a rhetorical question.
I suspect that means that Roberts gets to decide whether a line of questioning is relevant or not. As I understand the process, and I'm no expert, it's essentially a court presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Senators are jurors. The House provides the prosecutors, and the President can bring his own defense team. Maybe I'm TV courting this a little too much.And CJ Roberts would preside.
He only presides. The senate controls the proceeding. I am not an expert either but going by memory of the process when Clinton was impeached.I suspect that means that Roberts gets to decide whether a line of questioning is relevant or not. As I understand the process, and I'm no expert, it's essentially a court presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Senators are jurors. The House provides the prosecutors, and the President can bring his own defense team. Maybe I'm TV courting this a little too much.
I did read it all. Apparently you dont understand the meaning of words.Hey moron. Re read the OP
Then re read my response.
Then ask yourself again, did he say they can’t call witnesses.
I suspect that means that Roberts gets to decide whether a line of questioning is relevant or not. As I understand the process, and I'm no expert, it's essentially a court presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Senators are jurors. The House provides the prosecutors, and the President can bring his own defense team. Maybe I'm TV courting this a little too much.
Wouldn't it be awesome if this was the plan all along. Exposing the deep state in a show trial in the Senate for all the world to see in real time.
Except that isnt correct regarding CJ Roberts.Winner!!!!!
It is so easy to tell which posters on this board are intelligent and which posters are morons.
I looked it up. The justices have made procedural rulings during impeachment but the senate has also in the past voted to overrule the Justice. CJSCOTUS insures the vice president does not preside over the removal of the President from office.I suspect that means that Roberts gets to decide whether a line of questioning is relevant or not. As I understand the process, and I'm no expert, it's essentially a court presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Senators are jurors. The House provides the prosecutors, and the President can bring his own defense team. Maybe I'm TV courting this a little too much.
This is your brain on drugs.You guys are assuming a few things:
1. That the GOP Senate isn't part of the "Deep State" and "Swamp".....[winking]
2. That the GOP Senate doesn't see that Pence as POTUS would be best for reelection chances for Republicans to regain the White House.......[winking]
I love when he calls people stupid and then proceeds to provide proof that they are right and prove he himself wrong.So the GOP controlled Senate wouldn’t control the process...are you that stupid? Don’t answer, it’s a rhetorical question.
Well it is a Democrat led impeachment, thusly Trump is automatically guilty until proven innocent....So the defense cant call witnesses? You sure?
That is true in the house for sure.Well it is a Democrat led impeachment, thusly Trump is automatically guilty until proven innocent....
Well, you did. He gets to present a defense and the senate can subpeona anyone to appear. You really shouldnt call anyone a moron.
Yes you can. Its called a defense.No you can’t just call anyone to the stand.
Yes you can. Its called a defense.
And the GOP determines that.If it is pertinent to the case.
Thanks Sally. I dont think anyone was suggesting they were gonna call up Mr. Rogers and ask him about his neighborhood.If it is pertinent to the case.
That dude is proof the Indians used to **** their horsesThanks Sally. I dont think anyone was suggesting they were gonna call up Mr. Rogers and ask him about his neighborhood.
Thanks Sally. I dont think anyone was suggesting they were gonna call up Mr. Rogers and ask him about his neighborhood.
That dude is proof the Indians used to **** their horses
That dude is proof the Indians used to **** their horses
Hey. You were the one that suggested a stupid statement.
No you can’t just call anyone to the stand.
Yes you can. Its called a defense.
I’ll tell my wife, and no, it wasn’tThat's racist. Not shocked at all. Your side owns it.
Tell us again in your black voice you racist piece of ****.That's racist. Not shocked at all. Your side owns it.
Is sugartits mad today?He always does.
Dumbass.
What did I suggest that was wrong? Imagine a day when you can reply to me without me shoving **** down your throat. Dream big Chester.Hey. You were the one that suggested a stupid statement.
I can't even pretend to begin to know the answer to that. I would bet no, but I wouldn't risk too great a value.that if it goes before the Senate trial, then the Presidents attorney can subpoena anyone and and question anyone they want...and the GOP controlled Senate can dictate what is fair game to ask about?
That would be interesting