Rolling Back Rules Requiring More Energy-Efficient Bulbs
- Thread starter moe
- Start date
What is the point of a regulation that makes light bulb manufacturers only make light bulbs that are more expensive to make and more efficient?
Why is this a issue on a federal level to begin with. Sounds to me like the original law was dumb to begin with.
Why is this a issue on a federal level to begin with. Sounds to me like the original law was dumb to begin with.
See, I never fault anybody for making mistakes speaking off the cuff.Who hasn't called your second wife by your first wife's name?
“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement. … Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.”
We do all of that and always did....they still made a tremendous difference. The only issue I have seen with them is with three way lamps and some of the three way bulbs.
$150 billion cash in an unmarked aircraft in the dead of the night. (No LED bulbs or otherwise).
You should be walking or riding a bike or skate board. Hate to miss a chance to save energy
He thinks he's black when it'll help his argument. He thinks he's white when it'll help his argument. We call him zebra boy.
a suzuki lol
It was a very good reliable 4wheel drive commuter that got me to the mines and home all year around. That is what was important to me. Not emissions.