Nuclear changes, more troops heighten US-Iran tensions

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Could there be a bigger bunch of morons that Trump and his clown posse? Trump breaks the Iran deal and then we cry when Iran says they're going to violate the terms of the agreement that we pulled out of. smh

On Monday, the U.S. administration found itself in the awkward position of demanding that Iran comply with a nuclear accord that the president derided as the worst deal in history.

Administration officials found themselves Monday grappling with whether to press the remaining parties to the deal, including Britain, France and Germany, to demand that Iran stay in compliance. They must also consider if such a stance would essentially concede that the restrictions imposed during the Obama administration, while short of ideal, are better than none.

Yet, just last week, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog accused Iran of violating a provision of the deal that relates to advanced centrifuges and called on the Europeans to ensure that Iran remains in compliance.

https://www.apnews.com/803c5da247bd41d1b8c79af378e63945
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
It is downright lunacy but not surprising. Trumpers emboldening this idiot to make America less safe for stupid reasons. Need to smarten up but don't count on it. Just look at the stupidity posted on here by a few of the most hardened idiots spouting their usual nonsense. Unfortunately, they are not alone.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Biff's broken Iran deal is typical. Whole thing was handled poorly and he obviously has no plan. World would have been a better place if he left the plan alone and worked toward long term solutions beyond the existing plan. Biff gonna Biff.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Biff's broken Iran deal is typical. Whole thing was handled poorly and he obviously has no plan. World would have been a better place if he left the plan alone and worked toward long term solutions beyond the existing plan. Biff gonna Biff.
As much as anything, Trump just wants to undo anything done by BO....behold the great deal breaker!...Trump is an insecure stable genius [eyeroll]
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
I have a feeling that this thread will not age well. The Iran deal unlocked money they said they would use to help their nation get out of recession and feed the needy and neither ware addressed. To date the allies never had access to their weapons program, so who knows what they had, have or will have in the future. The only thing we know is that the people are fed up and are protesting for better living conditions. Just like in the USA, their extreme secular government needs forced out of office. The USA did it with Obama, they can do the same.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
To date the allies never had access to their weapons program, so who knows what they had, have or will have in the future.
Really?

The fresh IAEA quarterly report, however, found Iran continued to comply with the JCPOA and said its inspectors had been given unfettered access to Iranian nuclear facilities.

IAEA Report Says Iran Continues To Comply With Nuclear Deal

https://www.rferl.org/a/iaea-report-says-iran-continues-to-comply-with-nuclear-deal/29974795.html
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
Really?

The fresh IAEA quarterly report, however, found Iran continued to comply with the JCPOA and said its inspectors had been given unfettered access to Iranian nuclear facilities.

IAEA Report Says Iran Continues To Comply With Nuclear Deal

https://www.rferl.org/a/iaea-report-says-iran-continues-to-comply-with-nuclear-deal/29974795.html

The original deal never allowed access to military sites, only the sites that Iran gave them access to. Regardless of political affiliation, do you think Iran is an honest and just gov. who just wants nuclear technology to build MRI machines and generate energy when they are a net energy exporter?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
The original deal never allowed access to military sites, only the sites that Iran gave them access to. Regardless of political affiliation, do you think Iran is an honest and just gov. who just wants nuclear technology to build MRI machines and generate energy when they are a net energy exporter?
You say a lot of stuff but don't back it up. What are you trying to say? that they have other enrichment sites on military bases that we're not looking at? if so prove it. Why would we have access to military sites on a nuclear deal? Who said they didn't want a nuclear bomb? The deal that we were formerly a part of limits their enrichment capacity. How are they limited in terms of building a nuclear weapon when there is no deal (Trump's plan)? The deal that we had is way better than no deal at all and now this admin complains when Iran says they'll do what they want.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,320
7,051
113
Could there be a bigger bunch of morons that Trump and his clown posse? Trump breaks the Iran deal and then we cry when Iran says they're going to violate the terms of the agreement that we pulled out of. smh

On Monday, the U.S. administration found itself in the awkward position of demanding that Iran comply with a nuclear accord that the president derided as the worst deal in history.

Administration officials found themselves Monday grappling with whether to press the remaining parties to the deal, including Britain, France and Germany, to demand that Iran stay in compliance. They must also consider if such a stance would essentially concede that the restrictions imposed during the Obama administration, while short of ideal, are better than none.

Yet, just last week, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog accused Iran of violating a provision of the deal that relates to advanced centrifuges and called on the Europeans to ensure that Iran remains in compliance.

https://www.apnews.com/803c5da247bd41d1b8c79af378e63945
Squeeze those camel jockeys until they sweat hashish.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,320
7,051
113
Biff's broken Iran deal is typical. Whole thing was handled poorly and he obviously has no plan. World would have been a better place if he left the plan alone and worked toward long term solutions beyond the existing plan. Biff gonna Biff.
World would have been a much better place had we never given them that money and signed any treaty that an outlaw govt like Obama's wrote.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
You say a lot of stuff but don't back it up. What are you trying to say? that they have other enrichment sites on military bases that we're not looking at? if so prove it. Why would we have access to military sites on a nuclear deal? Who said they didn't want a nuclear bomb? The deal that we were formerly a part of limits their enrichment capacity. How are they limited in terms of building a nuclear weapon when there is no deal (Trump's plan)? The deal that we had is way better than no deal at all and now this admin complains when Iran says they'll do what they want.

I said the deal cut by Obama did not address military sites. That is true. The deal only slowed down their ability make a nuclear weapon. That is collaborated by CNN and the Obama administration. This missing piece is how much material have they already made? No one can answer that question except for Iran. We trusted them at their word. We never did a true assessment of their current stockpile. The old adage, "trust but verify" was not part of this deal! Don't think I really said that much, but what I have stated is accurate.

Iran is a secular gov. that puts Islam above all else. They are known supporters of global terrorism, but we made a deal like we would with Canada. Go figure.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
This missing piece is how much material have they already made? No one can answer that question except for Iran. We trusted them at their word. We never did a true assessment of their current stockpile. The old adage, "trust but verify" was not part of this deal!

Is this Groundhog Day? I guess I'll post this again. Tell me how Trump's no deal is better than the deal we had, the one that Iran is still a part of.

IAEA Report Says Iran Continues To Comply With Nuclear Deal

https://www.rferl.org/a/iaea-report-says-iran-continues-to-comply-with-nuclear-deal/29974795.html
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
In this thread the liberals defend good ole Iran for keeping their word.

Thanks Donald.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
Is this Groundhog Day? I guess I'll post this again. Tell me how Trump's no deal is better than the deal we had, the one that Iran is still a part of.

IAEA Report Says Iran Continues To Comply With Nuclear Deal

https://www.rferl.org/a/iaea-report-says-iran-continues-to-comply-with-nuclear-deal/29974795.html

Asking me for proof is like asking Trump to prove that he did not collude with the Russians. I think it's up to you to prove that we actually became less safe since Trump walked away from the deal?

Some might argue that the cash given to Iran could have been used to fund the terrorist plots in France, England and the middle east. I was against the deal prior to Trump even jumping into the race, and national polling did not support the deal. This is not a Trump issue, the battle lines were drawn before he was even a candidate. There is a reason it's not a treaty, it would never be ratified by the legislature branch.


A Dummy's Guide to the Iran Nuclear Deal

BY SHOBHIT SETH

Updated May 15, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS

A historical accord, or a historical mistake? Depends on whom you ask, and what they had at stake. After months of preparation, two weeks of final intensive discussions in Vienna and with eight parties involved, the final result was an agreement with five annexes. The Iran Nuclear Deal made headlines across the globe as a landmark historical agreement between extreme opponents.


The deal laid out a lengthy process spanning over 15-25 years that would be supervised by an eight-member committee, including Iran, the United States of America, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China and the European Union.


In a nutshell, the agreed-upon nuclear deal aimed at limiting Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon, in exchange for the removal of various sanctions imposed on it internationally. However, the deal got a significant shake-up under U.S. President Donald Trump, who on May 8, 2018, announced that the U.S. would be pulling out of the deal and issuing fresh sanctions against Iran.


IAEA) and subsequent discoveries, Iran continued to proceed with nuclear developments despite international opposition. In 2006, the United Nations imposed sanctions on Iran, which were followed by similar actions from the U.S. and the EU. Bitter confrontations then broke out between Iran and the world powers.


These sanctions – primarily on Iran's oil business, weapons sales and financial transactions – had severely hurt Iran’s economy. As one of the largest producers of crude oil, prices went through a volatile period as the outcome was largely unknown.


ISIS and the role of oil in Middle East economies.


embargo that prevented the import of oil from Iran was removed, which was not without its effects. The U.S. and EU lifted oil and trade-related sanctions. Foreign companies began to purchase oil from Iran, US companies located outside the U.S. were authorized to trade with Iran, and imports of selected items from Iran were permitted, which had a particular effect on international business.


Simultaneously, sanctions on Iran’s banking and financial systems were dropped. It enabled the immediate release of around $100 billion currently lying frozen in Iranian bank accounts overseas.


GDP, high inflation (between 50% to 70% in 2013), and the nation being cut-off from world economic systems. All such economic challenges drastically improved after the agreement.


Lifting sanctions would allow the movement of huge supplies of oil from Iran, which was thought to be sitting on large stockpiles due to years of imposed sanctions. International oil companies like France’s Total and Norway’s Statoil operated in Iran for years before sanctions were imposed, changing the tide for those countries and other top oil producers in the world.


European car manufacturers like Peugeot and Volkswagen were market leaders in Iran prior to the sanctions.


Although a few sectors like auto, oil, and infrastructure had significant interest from foreign companies in the pre-sanction era, the reality was that foreign businesses had limited presence in Iran since the 1979 Revolution. In essence, the Iranian markets had remained largely unexplored by international businesses across many other industry sectors.


claimed that the deal would make the U.S. and the world a safer place. However, concerns remained.


Challenges included administrating and monitoring the atomic facilities and developments in Iran. Complete awareness was required about the existing labs, establishments, underground sites, research centers, and military bases associated with nuclear developments. Though Iran agreed to provide the IAEA higher levels of information and deeper levels of access to all nuclear programs and facilities in the country, the picture remained murky.


Israeli leader Netanyahu said the deal "paves Iran's path to the bomb." His vehement opposition to the deal came on the basis of Iran’s history of being a nuclear-capable challenge for the Middle East region.


Additionally, Netanyahu said the deal was a platform to fund and nurture a nuclear-capable, religious-extremist country, saying a strengthened Iran could hinder peace and security in the region.


Enter President Trump
After the election of President Trump in November 2016, proponents of the deal feared the agreement, which they saw as a win for world peace, would be back on the table. And in October 2017, their fears were confirmed.


Trump announced that he would decertify the deal. What did this mean? Under the terms, the U.S. President was required to sign off on the deal every 90 days, which he announced he would not do, accusing Iran of sponsoring terrorism. Trump has also said that he would deny Iran "all paths to a nuclear weapon."


Not surprisingly, Trump's decision was met with instant condemnation. The European Union foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, was the first to weigh in saying the deal was "robust" and said there had been "no violations of any of the commitments in the agreement."


After Trump's decision, Congress had 60 days from that time to reinforce sanctions, and given the hostility within the Republican party, an agreement to reinstate appeared possible.


The Bottom Line
The pros and cons of such a landmark deal were and will continue to be debated. Most views, claims, and allegations are often politically tuned. For now, the majority across the globe appears to be positive about the Iran nuclear deal. However, after President Trump decertified the agreement the future became murkier.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Asking me for proof is like asking Trump to prove that he did not collude with the Russians. I think it's up to you to prove that we actually became less safe since Trump walked away from the deal?

Some might argue that the cash given to Iran could have been used to fund the terrorist plots in France, England and the middle east. I was against the deal prior to Trump even jumping into the race, and national polling did not support the deal. This is not a Trump issue, the battle lines were drawn before he was even a candidate. There is a reason it's not a treaty, it would never be ratified by the legislature branch.


A Dummy's Guide to the Iran Nuclear Deal

BY SHOBHIT SETH

Updated May 15, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS

A historical accord, or a historical mistake? Depends on whom you ask, and what they had at stake. After months of preparation, two weeks of final intensive discussions in Vienna and with eight parties involved, the final result was an agreement with five annexes. The Iran Nuclear Deal made headlines across the globe as a landmark historical agreement between extreme opponents.


The deal laid out a lengthy process spanning over 15-25 years that would be supervised by an eight-member committee, including Iran, the United States of America, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China and the European Union.


In a nutshell, the agreed-upon nuclear deal aimed at limiting Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon, in exchange for the removal of various sanctions imposed on it internationally. However, the deal got a significant shake-up under U.S. President Donald Trump, who on May 8, 2018, announced that the U.S. would be pulling out of the deal and issuing fresh sanctions against Iran.


IAEA) and subsequent discoveries, Iran continued to proceed with nuclear developments despite international opposition. In 2006, the United Nations imposed sanctions on Iran, which were followed by similar actions from the U.S. and the EU. Bitter confrontations then broke out between Iran and the world powers.


These sanctions – primarily on Iran's oil business, weapons sales and financial transactions – had severely hurt Iran’s economy. As one of the largest producers of crude oil, prices went through a volatile period as the outcome was largely unknown.


ISIS and the role of oil in Middle East economies.


embargo that prevented the import of oil from Iran was removed, which was not without its effects. The U.S. and EU lifted oil and trade-related sanctions. Foreign companies began to purchase oil from Iran, US companies located outside the U.S. were authorized to trade with Iran, and imports of selected items from Iran were permitted, which had a particular effect on international business.


Simultaneously, sanctions on Iran’s banking and financial systems were dropped. It enabled the immediate release of around $100 billion currently lying frozen in Iranian bank accounts overseas.


GDP, high inflation (between 50% to 70% in 2013), and the nation being cut-off from world economic systems. All such economic challenges drastically improved after the agreement.


Lifting sanctions would allow the movement of huge supplies of oil from Iran, which was thought to be sitting on large stockpiles due to years of imposed sanctions. International oil companies like France’s Total and Norway’s Statoil operated in Iran for years before sanctions were imposed, changing the tide for those countries and other top oil producers in the world.


European car manufacturers like Peugeot and Volkswagen were market leaders in Iran prior to the sanctions.


Although a few sectors like auto, oil, and infrastructure had significant interest from foreign companies in the pre-sanction era, the reality was that foreign businesses had limited presence in Iran since the 1979 Revolution. In essence, the Iranian markets had remained largely unexplored by international businesses across many other industry sectors.


claimed that the deal would make the U.S. and the world a safer place. However, concerns remained.


Challenges included administrating and monitoring the atomic facilities and developments in Iran. Complete awareness was required about the existing labs, establishments, underground sites, research centers, and military bases associated with nuclear developments. Though Iran agreed to provide the IAEA higher levels of information and deeper levels of access to all nuclear programs and facilities in the country, the picture remained murky.


Israeli leader Netanyahu said the deal "paves Iran's path to the bomb." His vehement opposition to the deal came on the basis of Iran’s history of being a nuclear-capable challenge for the Middle East region.


Additionally, Netanyahu said the deal was a platform to fund and nurture a nuclear-capable, religious-extremist country, saying a strengthened Iran could hinder peace and security in the region.


Enter President Trump
After the election of President Trump in November 2016, proponents of the deal feared the agreement, which they saw as a win for world peace, would be back on the table. And in October 2017, their fears were confirmed.


Trump announced that he would decertify the deal. What did this mean? Under the terms, the U.S. President was required to sign off on the deal every 90 days, which he announced he would not do, accusing Iran of sponsoring terrorism. Trump has also said that he would deny Iran "all paths to a nuclear weapon."


Not surprisingly, Trump's decision was met with instant condemnation. The European Union foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, was the first to weigh in saying the deal was "robust" and said there had been "no violations of any of the commitments in the agreement."


After Trump's decision, Congress had 60 days from that time to reinforce sanctions, and given the hostility within the Republican party, an agreement to reinstate appeared possible.


The Bottom Line
The pros and cons of such a landmark deal were and will continue to be debated. Most views, claims, and allegations are often politically tuned. For now, the majority across the globe appears to be positive about the Iran nuclear deal. However, after President Trump decertified the agreement the future became murkier.
Obviously the deal that Trump pulled us out of is better than letting Iran do anything they want (Trump's plan). Fortunately for the time being the Iran nuclear deal is still in place thanks to the other countries that signed onto it though Iran is stating that they will no longer adhere to important aspects of the deal going forward.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Obviously the deal that Trump pulled us out of is better than letting Iran do anything they want (Trump's plan). Fortunately for the time being the Iran nuclear deal is still in place thanks to the other countries that signed onto it though Iran is stating that they will no longer adhere to important aspects of the deal going forward.
Probably a good indicator thar Trump was correct to not accept the deal.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Obviously the deal that Trump pulled us out of is better than letting Iran do anything they want (Trump's plan). Fortunately for the time being the Iran nuclear deal is still in place thanks to the other countries that signed onto it though Iran is stating that they will no longer adhere to important aspects of the deal going forward.
Next admin will get us back in. This is just a hiccup.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
Obviously the deal that Trump pulled us out of is better than letting Iran do anything they want (Trump's plan). Fortunately for the time being the Iran nuclear deal is still in place thanks to the other countries that signed onto it though Iran is stating that they will no longer adhere to important aspects of the deal going forward.

Ok, so it's still OPINION on if the deal had any impact on the middle east peace accord or if IRAN's only goal is to have nuclear weapons. If you notice, the deal was more about allowing the other 7 countries the ability to trade with Iran and a few to gain access to oil reserves that they helped create prior to the Iranian Gov. seizing control of the oil.

On a totally different approach, I find it interesting that Obama was for green energy but choose the Iranian Deal to be his landmark international accomplishment. A deal that would have flooded the international markets with cheap oil thus increasing the use of fossil fuels. On top of that, it gave Iran a green light to a nuclear weapon, even Obama agreed that it only slowed it down a couple of years.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Lol, who is his Secretary of Defense? Oh right, thank god for Tucker Carlson, evidently he is thwarting Pompeo and Bolton, the GOP chickenhawks always love war, Donnie just ain't got a clue as usual.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Ok, so it's still OPINION on if the deal had any impact on the middle east peace accord or if IRAN's only goal is to have nuclear weapons. If you notice, the deal was more about allowing the other 7 countries the ability to trade with Iran and a few to gain access to oil reserves that they helped create prior to the Iranian Gov. seizing control of the oil.

On a totally different approach, I find it interesting that Obama was for green energy but choose the Iranian Deal to be his landmark international accomplishment. A deal that would have flooded the international markets with cheap oil thus increasing the use of fossil fuels. On top of that, it gave Iran a green light to a nuclear weapon, even Obama agreed that it only slowed it down a couple of years.
Whenever you figure out how no deal with Iran is better than the existing deal, be sure and share that wisdom with the board, thx. Guess who is flooding the world with crude and it's not Iran, that's right, we are.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Whenever you figure out how no deal with Iran is better than the existing deal, be sure and share that wisdom with the board, thx. Guess who is flooding the world with crude and it's not Iran, that's right, we are.
We are flooding the world with crude? I wonder if that has anything to do with Irans actions?
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
Whenever you figure out how no deal with Iran is better than the existing deal, be sure and share that wisdom with the board, thx. Guess who is flooding the world with crude and it's not Iran, that's right, we are.

Ok, Orange Man Bad, Iran Good. Got it. At least admit that most Americans were against the original deal prior to Trump even announcing for President. Obama did not allow us to export Natural Gas, so I would say us being a net exporter of oil/gas is a good thing, not a bad thing.

When you are trying to prove cause/effect you have to prove that something changed when a substance/law/action was introduced (Iran Deal). We have the change after the introduction, but not the change after it was taken away, as they are still clinging to the deal because the other countries want Iranian oil and access to their very small economic resources.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Ok, Orange Man Bad, Iran Good. Got it. At least admit that most Americans were against the original deal prior to Trump even announcing for President. Obama did not allow us to export Natural Gas, so I would say us being a net exporter of oil/gas is a good thing, not a bad thing.
False and false. Are you lying on purpose or just misinformed? just wondering...Also I don't blame you for not answering how Trump's no deal with Iran would compare to the former deal as you'd fail miserably so stick with the idiotic orange man bad thing, good call.

56 percent of people support Obama’s Iran deal. But they don’t think it will work.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-iran-deal-but-they-dont-think-it-will-work/

Trump touts natural gas exports Obama approved
https://www.axios.com/trump-touts-n...188-294269ed-e10d-4867-9575-6cc63d4299f1.html
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
False and false. Are you lying on purpose or just misinformed? just wondering...Also I don't blame you for not answering how Trump's no deal with Iran would compare to the former deal as you'd fail miserably so stick with the idiotic orange man bad thing, good call.

56 percent of people support Obama’s Iran deal. But they don’t think it will work.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-iran-deal-but-they-dont-think-it-will-work/

Trump touts natural gas exports Obama approved
https://www.axios.com/trump-touts-n...188-294269ed-e10d-4867-9575-6cc63d4299f1.html
Polls again
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
False and false. Are you lying on purpose or just misinformed? just wondering...Also I don't blame you for not answering how Trump's no deal with Iran would compare to the former deal as you'd fail miserably so stick with the idiotic orange man bad thing, good call.

56 percent of people support Obama’s Iran deal. But they don’t think it will work.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-iran-deal-but-they-dont-think-it-will-work/

Trump touts natural gas exports Obama approved
https://www.axios.com/trump-touts-n...188-294269ed-e10d-4867-9575-6cc63d4299f1.html


56 percent of people support Obama’s Iran deal. But they don’t think it will work.

I just searched for polls that had over 50% disapproval ratings. They are out there, but your best rebuttal states that the majority of Americans feel it won't work, and you can't find one instance that it did work and you are questioning my integrity?

Trump touts natural gas exports Obama approved

Obama signed legislation that allowed for the speeding up of permits to allow for the transportation of LNG on US flagged ships, there aren't any, as we were never allowed to export LNG. So after we built the ships, we could export the gas. It was the Legislature that greased the skid to speed up the process that Obama was slow playing. He knew he could not stop the export, but he did everything he could to slow it down...

This is just another instance where Obama is trying to take credit for something he was against the entire time.


https://thehill.com/policy/energy-e...ation-can-comply-with-natural-gas-export-bill
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
56 percent of people support Obama’s Iran deal. But they don’t think it will work.

I just searched for polls that had over 50% disapproval ratings. They are out there, but your best rebuttal states that the majority of Americans feel it won't work, and you can't find one instance that it did work and you are questioning my integrity?

Trump touts natural gas exports Obama approved

Obama signed legislation that allowed for the speeding up of permits to allow for the transportation of LNG on US flagged ships, there aren't any, as we were never allowed to export LNG. So after we built the ships, we could export the gas. It was the Legislature that greased the skid to speed up the process that Obama was slow playing. He knew he could not stop the export, but he did everything he could to slow it down...

This is just another instance where Obama is trying to take credit for something he was against the entire time.


https://thehill.com/policy/energy-e...ation-can-comply-with-natural-gas-export-bill
Correcting your posts is like a second job, shew. I'm not sure where you went to school but 56% > 50% therefore my article says that a majority of Americans supported the Iran deal, got it? The Iran nuclear deal has kept Iran from building a nuclear bomb which demonstrates the success of the existing deal so I have no idea where you get the notion that it didn't work. moving on.

As for U.S. natural gas exports, you're just making stuff up again. Guess why we didn't export any LNG until late in BO's tenure (Feb. 2016 which was before Trump was elected). They had to build the export terminal(s) first (Cheneire), shew. FYI, WV has a legislature while the U.S. has Congress. BO slow played nothing, he advanced the industry and the first LNG shipment(s) were made during his tenure.

First U.S. LNG Shipment Departs…for Brazil
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/First-US-LNG-Shipment-Departsfor-Brazil.html