They should have to name the reason. The Democrats need to officially open a impeachment investigation, since they are executing one anyways.
Congress is investigating without having a purpose
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
It's the IRS, right? They mispent fund... oh no, that's not it.
It's the State Department, they didn't follow the law when... no, that's not it.
It's HUD, no
It's ... no, it's not
They specifically want the president's information. Open the formal inquiry.
It's the State Department, they didn't follow the law when... no, that's not it.
It's HUD, no
It's ... no, it's not
They specifically want the president's information. Open the formal inquiry.
Wouldn’t his multiple business interests in foreign nations tied to leaders in those nations warrant an oversight if determined by our elected representatives to be concerning?
You dare question Him?
No worries. The scholars on this board know far more than these silly federal judges.
Here's what I don't understand. Pegrossi said He had obstructed justice and is involved in a cover up. How can you say that and not open up an impeachment inquiry? You can't have it both ways.
I feel like she seems to always help make things tougher. Infrastructure is important. Dems could take credit on a bill in the house
Wouldnt a committee need the docs in order to make a decision about a formal investigation?
Not using the i-word is a political calculation. I'm not defending it, but that's the simple truth.
All the investigations have a distinct purpose and have been reported, you choose to ignore it. I'm not wasting my time with right wing idiots that are warped in the mind arguing and doubling down with partisan opposition based on nothing while ignoring facts. I have better things to do.
I think its chickenshit and it's a miscalculation. Do Dems think investigating Trump is going to help Trump? They think they won't find anything and a quiet Trump will become sympathetic? Oof.
The article that was posted yesterday mentioned money laundering as the only crime that could be used to gain access to his financial data from the banks. I asked yesterday, where did this new accusation originate and where is the smoking gun?
I will say that the Biden's dealing with Ukraine and China appears to have more proof of money laundering than what they think they have on the Trump Organization.
I will say that the Biden's dealing with Ukraine and China appears to have more proof of money laundering than what they think they have on the Trump Organization.
And BTW, she did use impeachment, just put a qualifying "could" in front of it. Which gets back to my point....how can you say the President obstructed justice and is involved in a cover up and not begin an impeachment inquiry?
The bank admitted to seeing things that were obvious red flags for money laundering and admitted to not properly reporting them.
That was you the day atl made you so mad you tried to tell everyone you were a black man so you couldnt be a racist.
of which all are Republican....and then we can visit the Republican Supreme Court....but CNN says u can’t do that...
You’re as dumb as ****.
https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2019/may/20/deutsche-bank-flagged-trump-kushner-dea/
yes, yes he is.
Michael Cohen Showed Where Trump Investigations Are Headed | Time
http://time.com/5540665/michael-cohen-testimony-threats/
New report implicates Trump in same crime that’s sending Michael Cohen to jail – ThinkProgress
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-implicated-in-fraud-deutsche-bank-michael-cohen-501979c1453d/
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-implicated-in-fraud-deutsche-bank-michael-cohen-501979c1453d/
What is this laughable? I am using the same rationale that the left is using to go after Trump. Can you justify what they think they had with Trump and what we know about the Ukraine and China's dealings with Biden's son and not agree that it needs to be vetted? He is the democratic frontrunner, is he not?
Vetted? Absolutely. Unlike you Trump gals, I think our candidates should be investigated. I was laughing at your comment about proof yadda yadda yadda. As if you have any clue.
WITCHHUNT!!!
Distraction from Huber, Durham, and Horowitz. Declassification starts within days. Panic is sitting in.
Quote from article.
"The red flags raised by employees do not necessarily mean the transactions were improper"
That idiot reads headlines then and pees herself !
It says that the bank looked at the situation and disagreed with the employee.
The source of the story was the employee.