Why did Dems get upset when Trump
- Thread starter EERs 3:16
- Start date
And now trying to call efforts to stop those bills the greatest attack on womens choice in decades.
Because Trump and Republicans are politicizing a very important topic by presenting a half truth. Most of the speech was delivered with half truths and statements out of context. It was horrible to watch as an American that wants honest discussion starting with a President's initiatives
What is the half truth? Do they only half want to kill the baby after its born, or do they want to only half kill the baby after its born?
Very good read for those that don't understand how Trump tells half truths, specifically on this subject. I don't expect some wingnuts to understand even if they do read it.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/06/health/late-term-abortion-explainer/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/06/health/late-term-abortion-explainer/index.html
Lol, why worry about us so much, just put it in your platform and run on it, Roe vs. Wade repeal. All polling is fake and you guys are the majority. We get it, ya think we are baby murderers, how many times ya gonna say the same thing, it's a winner for ya, so put forth the meat behind ya'lls whining and save those unborn babies from us demonic un-American ghouls. lmfao.
My family is pro life but agree that the current RvW decision is needed. What NY and 7 other states are trying to do is over the top and gives the power of a select few the ability to take the life a baby outside of the womb. This is not RvW, that is murder.
For someone who rails on 'muh demographics' as much as keyser, he sure does have a tenuous grasp on what they really are.
Is denying someone with Diabetes, Cancer, etc. with medical treatment because they do not have insurance or cannot afford it killing them?
That's a good question for Republicans......[winking]
Not one person in the US is without medical care. 99% of the hospitals have to accept and treat any patient that shows up in their ER, be treated and discharged with a continuation of care. It may be costing up billions by doing it this way, but it's true!
It is if they don't have a living will allowing for that to happen. Both of my parents had living wills and I had execute their wishes. A newborn does not have a living will.
Minor children which a newborn is do not have certain rights and can't have a living will. Therefore, other legal decisions regarding their health is in play.
Just curious,how did your Queen of the damned,State of Gitmo go? Enquiring minds want to know.. oh,and is RBG having a "sleep over" at your place? We can keep a secret..
Are you saying there is no duty of care to a child? I get your point, it’s a bad one and I think you’re better than that.
I mean, if I stop feeding my kids and they die, that’s neglect, manslaughter, and even murder. Are you arguing that’s the same as removing life support?
Yeah, and open borders and men in bathrooms, ya'll got the moral high ground again even with Trump, dammit, lmfao.
It's THEIR CHOICE you satanic,incredibly, narrascitic, incompetent fxchstain!!
Wrong...again.
20% of the hospitals in the U.S. are considered "private" and have the right to turn people away.
Please rephrase that. Are you saying that a child/newborn does not have a protected right to live, and a physician has to right kill them if they so choose for any reason?
Do you understand that it has nothing to do with public/private. The rule is if an institution accepts gov. funds they have to take all patients. Private hospitals accept Medicare payments, so they have to accept non paying patients for emergency care.
They do not have to accept a patient for an elective surgery or procedure, but they do have to accept anyone presenting in the ED.
Abortion is ending a human life, that's a fact. The only real question is whether or not you are OK with that.
Another whacko twisting words. What a surprise.
I said newborns can't have a living will.
Simple enough?
They do not have to accept a patient for an elective surgery or procedure, but they do have to accept anyone presenting in the ED.[/QUOTE]
Learn......please.....
Hospitals are required by law to provide "stabilizing care" with an emergency medical condition only.
My example was for cancer, or diabetes....of which is something that you CAN be denied for: medications, etc.
Learn......please.....
Hospitals are required by law to provide "stabilizing care" with an emergency medical condition only.
My example was for cancer, or diabetes....of which is something that you CAN be denied for: medications, etc.
Well, when you're aligned with the moral law giver then that will always be the case.