Is there collusion in that indictment?
- Thread starter DvlDog4WVU
- Start date
Ya don’t say? That’s weird.
Russians in this indictment anywhere?
Bru, you’re not smarter than me. You should just come to terms with that and move on.
Coordinating with Russia on leaks isn’t collusion in your opinion? Serious question.
Is that in there?
To your point, yes, I’d say it definitely is and it’d be conspiracy. I’d also say they’ll have to tie him to the campaign directly, and if they do that, great. We can impeach Trump and move on from this cluster ****.
Is that what's in the indictments? Serious question, still looking for them to read them.
For the brain dead Trumpers, do you know why Trump and idiots like yourself play the game of repeating "no collusion" and "not going to be guilty of collusion?"
It isn't a crime. It is spin in order to put out a comment that is a half truth and fool you people. Congratulations, you win. You have been fooled and you sure look the part.
It isn't a crime. It is spin in order to put out a comment that is a half truth and fool you people. Congratulations, you win. You have been fooled and you sure look the part.
Still have to convict. As long as Obama and HRC, the entire liberal FBI upper escelon MFers are running free, he should stay in office
I didn’t even throw my best lure in the water. Between him and Cunty, it’s like fishing without a hook and the fish just jump in the boat.
They each have their blind spots. One of them is an cantacerous old codger who wants desperately to have his life experience be respected. The other one is just trying to validate his Facebook feed and wants to be considered intellectual to go along with his Masters. Classic case of book smart/blithering idiot socially and has a very narrow road of life experience.
When you know their blind spots, you can manipulate them like dancing monkeys.
Ummmmm I’m sure there are about 1000 posts at the onset 2 years ago when we had to clue you fvcking ignoramuses into that fact. We all knew and know it’s conspiracy, further, we all see that none of these indictments and convictions have broached the shores of conspiracy.
So just read the 24 page indictment. No mention that Stone met with, communicated with, Russians in any capacity.
It's all about him trying to find out what Wikileaks had and when they were going to release it, and the testimony he gave over that activity.
The worst part IMHO is the witness tampering.
Haven’t read them, but there’s an excerpt about Stone and an unnamed senior campaign official discussing the timing of Wikileaks
What’s the context of the witness tampering? Is it legit or the same nonsensical ******** that was in the article on him like a year ago?
That’s not what you asked. Oh well. Looks like it’s that time for people in this thread to talk past each other. To me, this is the second time the campaign colluded with Russia (juniors tower meeting). It’s clearly not going to matter. Indict Jr, turn in the report and be done.
The reason it's repeated is because that is what the MSM lemming'd about for 9 months.
At some point, don’t we have to start indicting people for the actual conspiracy aspect of this and not process crimes after the fact?
He went coocoo on "Person 2":
For example:
a.
On or about December 24, 2017, Person 2 texted STONE, “I met [the head of
Organization 1] for frst time this yea[r] sept 7 . . . docs prove that. . . . You should
be honest w fbi . . . there was no back channel . . . be honest.” STONE replied
approximately two minutes later, “I’m not talking to the FBI and if your smart you
won’t either.”
b.
On or about April 9, 2018, STONE wrote in an email to Person 2, “You are a rat.
A stoolie. You backstab your friends-run your mouth my lawyers are dying Rip
you to shreds.” STONE also said he would “take that dog away from you,”
referring to Person 2’s dog. On or about the same day, STONE wrote to Person 2,
“I am so ready. Let’s get it on. Prepare to die [expletive].”
c.
On or about May 21, 2018, Person 2 wrote in an email to STONE, “You should
have just been honest with the house Intel committee . . . you’ve opened yourself
up to perjury charges like an idiot.” STONE responded, “You are so full of
[expletive]. You got nothing. Keep running your mouth and I’ll file a bar
complaint against your friend [the attorney who had the ability to contact the head
of Organization 1].”
He even made Godfather references at one point.
Bru....with all due respect........Wasn't "collusion" the anti anything Trump rallying cry in the beginning of all this. I think Boom and I even had a bet of Pancake mix on Trump being charged with "collusion". I said no and Boom said he would.
It's a campaign turning to a foreign actor to dig up, or obtain, dirt on the opposition.
From how I understand it, the FBI opened the investigation in the summer of 16 looking at the act of the campaign colluding with the Russians. All the various talking heads and even people on here often make half truth statements using words that are not accurate and then pissing matches start and from there, lord knows what kind of crap is said. I've been guilty of that and so have you and so many others. So, I don't really care about a "rallying cry". I care about the truth and is why I barely speak on this investigation until truths are officially released. Indictments are part of what I consider the truths and when I talk (just speaking for myself), I try to speak the truth as I understand it from what is known to the public without any spin from others. I hope I get my comments as right as possible.
Pretty much what I thought.
I’ll await the conspiracy charges to follow, we still haven’t got there.
If he did conspire with foreign actors, wouldn't that be in the indictment?
Actually good question. Answer is we don't know. I'm pretty sure he knows what he is doing and one shouldn't jump to conclusions based on the unknown.
Well yeah, SOP is you throw every charge you can at them you can, squeeze them, and get the next person up. Mueller so far has been squeeze them, charge them on process crimes.
Because there's no there, there.
