Does Penn have the death penalty?
- Thread starter Airport
- Start date
Yes Express way to Hell...no question about his guilt...ofcourse the only time a liberal thinks your guilty is if your a Republican
What ever makes sense. There's always a lot of unnecessary noise in things like this.
Why? Isn't premeditated murder hateful? The only reason for hate crimes is so that ***** states without the death penalty wouldn't look so bad.
You state some of the craziest things. You don't think some people plan a murder for other reasons than hate? Maybe killing for money? Maybe to go Jeffrey Dalmer on someone? Maybe to quiet someone?
Hate crimes are not for te reason you gave but zero chance you understanding.
The person who planned the hit, paying somebody, sure must hate him. Dalmer was not put to death like he should have been. Why not? I know why the hate crimes is there. I just point out the absurdity of needing it. How about special circumstances instead of hate crime?
It isn't hate. Why shouldn't state law deal with the person? Why is it the federal responsibility to execute the person? Bru mentioned Dalmer, he wasn't put to death. Why not? Wasn't he murdered in prison?
I'm not a legal expert but I believe the intent of calling it a hate crime is due to a violation of a constitutional right in addition to the actual crime. In this case, it is a violation of being and exercising their right to freedom of religion.
By being murdered.
Crime is crime, regardless of intent. Murder is murder, to murder is to hate, regardless of the reason behind it. Creating a new classification of crime is not going to curtail it, or discourage it.
That being said, use the laws on the books and fry him.
Hate crimes pertain to race, and sexual preference. Why wasn't gary Ridgeway executed? My guess would be the state of Washington didn't think killing 40 women reason enough. Maybe he didn't hate enough women. There are people who should be put to death, the Pittsburgh guy is one of them. I prefer special circumstances over hate. It's the same thing.
Should the state be held responsible for allowing him in with the general population, therefore setting up his murder because the other inmates hated him? Is that state sponsored hate crime? See how convoluted hate crime legislation can get?
Special circumstances. Terrorism is by definition hate. I would prefer the term special circumstances over hate. That's all.
He hated gay men. Why didn't the feds jump in there? I just wish that we used the term special circumstances.
The legal system is required to keep the inmate in a safe environment. They obviously did not. That's why some are kept in isolation for their own safety. being the all knowing pooh bah that you are, you should be aware of that.
A hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. For the purposes of collecting statistics, the FBI has defined a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity.” Hate itself is not a crime—and the FBI is mindful of protecting freedom of speech and other civil liberties.
I don't recall. But from my memory of his crime, I don't see how it is applicable. No clue of your point with that question