I wanna go back to Major Harris and Pat White. Hell, even Hoss could(would) tuck the ball and run. Get some nasty lineman like Jozwiak and hardcore running backs (I think we have some good backs). I wanna play smash mouth. I don’t wanna EVER be stopped running the ball to some extent. This pass happy offense isn’t for me. It seems cheap and easy and causes players to be soft. I want mean, pound it down your throat football!
When you become a little more rational, read what you wrote and note that your comments are the result of disappointment and frustration.You admit with in text that you "...think we have some good backs..." so that negates much of you proposed solution to our problems. We are struggling to get a running game--pure and simple. Because of it ISU was able to drop 8 or so on most plays and negate our passing attack. Why the problems rushing the ball? Many answers have been proposed by numerous of our resident experts--poor OL, poor OL coaching, slow backs, poor play calling that has all runs going between guards, weakness at center and right guard, etc., etc, etc. We started the year with, potentially, 4 very good RBs and all having different type talent from the others. However, tonight I only recall seeing McKoy and Pettaway. Leddie Brown--injured? Sinkfield missing for the past several games (and our funk began about that same time. Coincidence?) I do not recall Bush playing tonight. If he did, his presence was unremarkable. Thus we have, once again, seen our RB stable reduced to a couple of plow horses--maybe great for their intended purposes but hardly confused with a thoroughbred or even a quarter horse. Can't blame recruiting. We have the makings of, as you note, a backfield of '...good backs...', but they have to be available to actually play to be of benefit. You seem to advocate having a QB who will win because he will '...tuck the ball and run...'. Yet, I vividly recall ALL the many comments last year regarding Will's broken finger and how DUMB it was for him to run that play or ever think of being a running QB. Your assessment of 'pass happy offenses' and that they are "...cheap and easy lead to soft players..." is downright silly. You might not like the wide open style and prefer tOSU plan of the 50's with Woody Hayes (3 yards and a cloud of dust), but a lot of folks have a greater appreciation for the broader appeal of football than that. Remember, I have also suggested we add the wishbone wrinkle to our running game (when ALL the back are, once again healthy). Would be interesting to see how it might fare for a few plays each game (IF we have a someone who could handle the option aspects).