Avenatti promises new Kavanaugh accuser to come forward in next 48 hours

[DvlDog4WVU]

I grant that but going back into history 36 years to establish a fact would by definition mean others have to corroborate it would it not?

Yes, all I was saying though is that they don’t dig as deeply into your past as you were indicating. Mostly, they are just cross referencing information you provide and a pseudo deep dive into areas of potential leverage. Debt is a big one they look into, International travel, Interaction with foreign nationals, work related conflicts, and that sort of stuff. Marital stuff could come up like if you’re found to be cheating on your spouse etc, excessive drinking, drugs and the like.

Basically, they’re looking for potential leverage points a foreign state could use to compromise you.

 

[dave]

I don't think the Republicans are reluctant to have the FBI look into this because they don't think the story is true, I just don't think they believe it is necessary especially since there are no eyewitnesses and the FBI has already looked into his background enough to confirm no previous behavior of this type.

The FBI is the exec. branch and conforming Kavanaugh is the legislative branch. The senate thinks it is their job to investigate it.

 

[atlkvb]

The FBI is the exec. branch and conforming Kavanaugh is the legislative branch. The senate thinks it is their job to investigate it.

I wish more Leftists understood that.

 

[mule_eer]

The doors to the FBI are wide open if she wanted to walk in and file a statement over the past 35 years. Its a great question.

Does the FBI have jurisdiction in a state crime? If she wanted to file a complaint or a statement, I would think we would have to do the in Montgomery Count, MD. Like I said before, I can think of reasons why she would not do that if she is telling the truth. I can similarly think of how her failure to do that could say things, both pro and con, about her claims to begin with.

 

[mule_eer]

I don't see how it could if it's that prominent a part of his past. Particularly since there are no other witnesses where this would have taken place that the FBI would have to by definition confirm the allegation with. How else would the FBI either confirm or reject the story without interviewing others who saw what the accuser accuses Judge Kavanaugh of doing?

Everyone wants the FBI to come in now 36 years after the fact to establish it but when they looked into his background the story never even came up! No one can explain that, not even you... despite your claim that you did.

It may not be a prominent part of his past, assuming the allegation is true. It could have been a one-time thing. I don't claim to know. If true, that event would likely be a prominent part of Ford's past regardless of how it impacted Kavanaugh.

 

[atlkvb]

Does the FBI have jurisdiction in a state crime? If she wanted to file a complaint or a statement, I would think we would have to do the in Montgomery Count, MD. Like I said before, I can think of reasons why she would not do that if she is telling the truth. I can similarly think of how her failure to do that could say things, both pro and con, about her claims to begin with.

Everything you argue here Mule is certainly plausible. But her story is not credible especially with her 4 named eyewitnesses all saying it didn't happen or they never saw it. She's got some 'splainin' to do without anything other than her faded memory of what did or did not happen that day.

She needs some help. Her recollection alone ain't a knife sharp enough to make that cut.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[mule_eer]

Everything you argue here Mule is certainly plausible. But her story is not credible especially with her 4 named eyewitnesses all saying it didn't happen or they never saw it. She's got some 'splainin' to do without anything other than her faded memory of what did or did not happen that day.

She needs some help. Her recollection alone ain't a knife sharp enough to make that cut.

That may be true as well. That's why I think Judge should testify as well. I reserve judgement about the credibility of her story until after she's provided testimony and answered questions.

 

[atlkvb]

That may be true as well. That's why I think Judge should testify as well. I reserve judgement about the credibility of her story until after she's provided testimony and answered questions.

I agree. But 'ol girl is probably not showing up to tell her story. That's fine. She seals Judge Kavanaugh's nomination from the committee if she doesn't show up with her story.

 

[Airport]

That may be true as well. That's why I think Judge should testify as well. I reserve judgement about the credibility of her story until after she's provided testimony and answered questions.

For anybody to testify, she has to show up. If she shows up and can name where it happened, when it happened, who's house, how many were there, then everybody else needs to step forward.

 

[mule_eer]

I agree. But 'ol girl is probably not showing up to tell her story. That's fine. She seals Judge Kavanaugh's nomination from the committee if she doesn't show up with her story.

Is Kavanaugh going to be questioned by the same outside counsel if they go that route? If not, she deserves the same respect as Kavanaugh. If so, then I don't really have any issues with outside counsel other than that this is the job of that committee. Why are they farming it out other than to avoid political scrutiny? If they can't stand the heat, they are in the wrong line of work.

 

[dave]

Does the FBI have jurisdiction in a state crime? If she wanted to file a complaint or a statement, I would think we would have to do the in Montgomery Count, MD. Like I said before, I can think of reasons why she would not do that if she is telling the truth. I can similarly think of how her failure to do that could say things, both pro and con, about her claims to begin with.

She can file a repirt with the FBI if she wants. Nothing is stopping her. They are likely to refer her to the state and county.

 

[dave]

Is Kavanaugh going to be questioned by the same outside counsel if they go that route? If not, she deserves the same respect as Kavanaugh. If so, then I don't really have any issues with outside counsel other than that this is the job of that committee. Why are they farming it out other than to avoid political scrutiny? If they can't stand the heat, they are in the wrong line of work.

Yes. That is the point of bringing in specialist who know how to question these matters.

 

[atlkvb]

For anybody to testify, she has to show up. If she shows up and can name where it happened, when it happened, who's house, how many were there, then everybody else needs to step forward.

I'm starting to think @WVU82 has called it with his prediction she won't ever testify.

 

[atlkvb]

Is Kavanaugh going to be questioned by the same outside counsel if they go that route? If not, she deserves the same respect as Kavanaugh. If so, then I don't really have any issues with outside counsel other than that this is the job of that committee. Why are they farming it out other than to avoid political scrutiny? If they can't stand the heat, they are in the wrong line of work.

I think Kavanaugh is ready to answer any and all questions no matter who asks them.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[Airport]

I'm starting to think @WVU82 has called it with his prediction she won't ever testify.

I don't know for sure. It's the dems only hope. She doesn't testify and testify well, he will be confirmed.

 

[atlkvb]

I don't know for sure. It's the dems only hope. She doesn't testify and testify well, he will be confirmed.

If I were a Dem depending on this Chick to show up and credibly tell her story as my only hope stopping Judge Kavanaugh's seating on the Supreme Court....I'd be very nervous. Like Pitt fans before their sorry *** team takes the field and gets manhandled.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[wvu2007]

Slow @moe embarrasses himself again.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[atlkvb]

Dems are running out of mud to fling. Nothing's sticking...need a better grade of mud! A "rape train"?:scream:

 

[atlkvb]

Slow @moe embarrasses himself again.

You wasted a few key strokes typing "again"[winking]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[atlkvb]

You know, the way they did with Hillary.


Oh Hello!

Did they really do that? Um Yeah...can you believe it??????

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[atlkvb]

Damn....I gotta figure out another scam to get that 10 mil I'm in hock for but quick!

 

[79eer]

Not sure what is more entertaining, this Wing Nut getting pranked, ...... or his stupidity was exposed, never suspecting he was a prime target. ........ Gotta love it!

 

[atlkvb]

Not sure what is more entertaining, this Wing Nut getting pranked, ...... or his stupidity was exposed, never suspecting he was a prime target. ........ Gotta love it!

They called him up, and sent him a clip of this chick who walked in on Kavanaugh in bed with another woman! He ate it up.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[79eer]

Q: How many lawyer jokes are there?
A: Only three. The rest are true stories.

 

[TarHeelEer]

It was a brilliant play by someone. If CreepyPornLawyer doesn't produce, which he won't, that guy will live in internet history forever. The truth of the troll doesn't matter.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[Boomboom521]

Is Kavanaugh going to be questioned by the same outside counsel if they go that route? If not, she deserves the same respect as Kavanaugh. If so, then I don't really have any issues with outside counsel other than that this is the job of that committee. Why are they farming it out other than to avoid political scrutiny? If they can't stand the heat, they are in the wrong line of work.

Imo, the GOP knows very well that punting doesn’t piss their loyal fans off. Their game plan usually relies on opponent mistakes.

 

[atlkvb]

Now that's funny! Good one 82! kay:

 

[TarHeelEer]

 

[WVUCOOPER]

I can't believe conspiracy loon Trump suckers fell for 4chan nonsense. Who'd a thunk it?

 

[WVUCOOPER]

It was a brilliant play by someone. If CreepyPornLawyer doesn't produce, which he won't, that guy will live in internet history forever. The truth of the troll doesn't matter.

A snapshot of 2018. lol.