It's not up to me (fine by me anyway) but voters will decide if they like that or what the Democrat alternatives are to improve on it.
Woodward Book?
- Thread starter Boomboom521
- Start date
It's not up to me (fine by me anyway) but voters will decide if they like that or what the Democrat alternatives are to improve on it.
When you read it will you do us all a favor for the OT forum and post the policy results the resistors are against, or at least whatever they thought was the better alternative?
Thanks!
Last edited:
Hahahaha, Kelly and Mattis say he’s lying, at least about them. Their integrity and honor is beyond reproach, Mattis especially. Enjoy your propaganda.
I heard during an interview yesterday Woodward claiming he tried but never could get a statement from Trump about the book.
That's just not credible to me considering how many different people he had to speak with in order to get his interviews and at any time during that process he could have gone to Trump and asked "is this true" before publishing it?
Fraud alert.
LOL....they are with him all the time, Kelly is there 24/7. It's scientifically impossible for someone who is with him that much to not snap at some point and call Biff an idiot because he is. Hell, I would have snapped way sooner.
We know who Bob Woodward is and is track record has always been there for all to see..
It’s because you are a far lesser man than those two. Mattis is just shy of deity.
I don't know...maybe you were desperate or she had a nice ***? But after living with her for 24/7 for a couple of years and she's driving you nuts as apparently the examples you offered are going nuts being around Trump, do you stay and put up with her irritating *** or just write an annoymous "Dear Abby" letter saying how much you can't stand her?
Last edited:
Apples and oranges. I’d dump her. But Mattis and Kelly will stick it out for the long haul to protect us from the flailing manchild.
This Idiot
OMG...Swamp dwelling glittering jewel of collassal ignorance and incompetence.
Floridians voting for her are beyond stupid.
Yup...no one named, no attributions, no one willing to stand by their statements...non existent phony charges from non existent, non corroborated people.
How do you know any of it is true? Because you simply want to believe it. But you can't and neither did the authors prove one word of it.
Sorry. No names. No proof. Fake news. Want to convict Trump? In the court of public opinion, you need facts tied to names. Otherwise it's just gossip most folks are tuning out except you TDS infected Leftists.
“No matter how many outraged opinion pieces or news articles the New York Times produces, no matter how many smarter-than-thou analysts with non-prescription eyeglasses mope about sadly on CNN, no matter how many Obama fan boys and girls left in the White House press corps shriek at the president whenever in earshot, it just doesn’t matter anymore.
The economy hums. Trump keeps us out of foreign entanglements. Wages increase. America’s traditional meritocracy replaces the Democrats’ grievance-based society. Life happens.
And while the New York Times op-ed was a nice try by the media, they must on some level, deep down, grasp the new reality: no one hears their screams.”
IN A NUTSHELL, ...... MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS SUCCESSFULLY NEUTERED ITSELF.
The economy hums. Trump keeps us out of foreign entanglements. Wages increase. America’s traditional meritocracy replaces the Democrats’ grievance-based society. Life happens.
And while the New York Times op-ed was a nice try by the media, they must on some level, deep down, grasp the new reality: no one hears their screams.”
IN A NUTSHELL, ...... MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS SUCCESSFULLY NEUTERED ITSELF.
Last edited:
Perfectly stated. They're like the "boy who cried Wolf" and there's no substance to their story or even a real Wolf to worry about. 100% obvious all of their criticism of Trump has nothing to do with his failed agenda. In fact it's the exact opposite. His agenda is so successful with such great results it has left them muted for alternatives and reduced to sniping about him personally to try and discredit him in the eyes of voters so they will stop supporting all the good results of his successful agenda.
It's the only way they can stop him. They have nothing else policy wise to do it.
I read the article and according to the quotes people inside the Trump Administration prevented him from sending us into World War 3. So then he holds a summit with Kim Jong Un and announces a preliminary plan to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, and all the Left did was criticize him for cozying up with a Dictator!
So basically he was damned when he did and was damned if he didn't. All the words in that piece, not one policy position was ever offered as an alternative to what Trump has actually accomplished. Not one.
So we are led to believe that without the courage of these unnamed people who decided for themselves that Trump's policy positions were not the ones that should have been followed, we should get rid of Trump and put them in charge. Even though we have no idea who they are or what they actually believe. We get to judge Trump on his policy results while these guys get to hang around in the background as "anonymous" complaining about his decision making.
See how nice and convenient that works?
If Trump's policies were failing, don't you think the Left would be out there offering alternatives they would suggest are better?
So the fact they are only suggesting he resign over personal smears & allegations that he is in over his head is tacit admission that his policies at least are successfully working and they have no better alternatives do they?
So the fact they are only suggesting he resign over personal smears & allegations that he is in over his head is tacit admission that his policies at least are successfully working and they have no better alternatives do they?
No coincidence that Woodward releases portions of his book, then days, week, later an op-ed is published by someone claiming to be inside the administration, working against the administration.
If Woodward is basing his book of those "inside" the administration, he may be basing his book off of ******** and not realize it.
But hey... it's Woodward, and he could NEVER get anything wrong.
If Woodward is basing his book of those "inside" the administration, he may be basing his book off of ******** and not realize it.
But hey... it's Woodward, and he could NEVER get anything wrong.
