“CNN, which relied on Davis at least in part for a story he now says is false, won't say it made a mistake.”
................ If nobody saw it, is it still considered a false story / mistake?
“CNN, which relied on Davis at least in part for a story he now says is false, won't say it made a mistake.”
................ If nobody saw it, is it still considered a false story / mistake?
CNN turning into Trump!
Who are you quoting?“CNN, which relied on Davis at least in part for a story he now says is false, won't say it made a mistake.”
................ If nobody saw it, is it still considered a false story / mistake?
Trump isn't a journalist, it's up to the journalists to be accurate but they are criminally wrong.CNN turning into Trump!
Trying to go head to head against The Food Channel.What mistake did CNN make?
You've got nothing, no surprise.Trying to go head to head against The Food Channel.
Couldn't they say that about virtually their entire so called "Journalistic" operation?
When's the last time CNN reported something accurately? Especially about Trump?
![]()
Hahahaha that’s some funny ****.Trying to go head to head against The Food Channel.
Do you watch CNN? So how would you know?
You've got nothing, no surprise.
CNN reported and continues to report what Cohen's lawyer has said on the topic.Bernstein by lined article states that anonymous sources say, "blah, blah, blah". "blah, blah, blah" was wrong. Lanny admits he was that source. Article also states that Lanny had no comment.
CNN reported and continues to report what Cohen's lawyer has said on the topic.
Trump isn't a journalist, it's up to the journalists to be accurate but they are criminally wrong.
You are a poor communicator. CNN reported and continues to report what Cohen's lawyer has said on the topic.They said he had no comment, even though he was a source. Can you not follow simple English? The assumption you can make is that he was not a source... but he was.
You are a poor communicator. CNN reported and continues to report what Cohen's lawyer has said on the topic.
What are you trying to say? That Lanny Davis did comment to CNN (when they said he didn't)?https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/26/poli...-trump-june-2016-meeting-knowledge/index.html
By Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein and Marshall Cohen, CNN
Updated 9:47 AM ET, Fri July 27, 2018
"sources with knowledge"
"according to sources"
"these sources"
LIE - "Contacted by CNN, one of Cohen's attorneys, Lanny Davis, declined to comment."
Where's the coverage on TV? They keep running it and not issuing a retraction. Doesn't matter, HGTV is killing them.Attorney for Michael Cohen keeps changing his story on Trump Tower meeting
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/28/politics/lanny-davis-trump-tower-michael-cohen/index.html
For lying about Cohen saying that Trump knew about the Tower meeting. I guess you missed it since nobody watches cNNa retraction for what?
They were just quoting their sources. You all act like all investigations are over, all statements have been made. Try to relax, it's far from over.For lying about Cohen saying that Trump knew about the Tower meeting. I guess you missed it since nobody watches cNN
Do you watch CNN? So how would you know?
When are you not supposed to verify your sources? I remember news organizations saying you should verify each account with two other sources. We get it, CNN is in the tank and always has been.They were just quoting their sources.
One source, lying LannyThey were just quoting their sources. You all act like all investigations are over, all statements have been made. Try to relax, it's far from over.
Who cries more, you or Trump?When are you not supposed to verify your sources? I remember news organizations saying you should verify each account with two other sources. We get it, CNN is in the tank and always has been.