President calls for Sessions to stop Mueller investigation

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
I will pay a full year's subscription to Blue Lot to any Leftist who can explain how Trump stole votes from Hillary with the help of the Russians to win the '16 Presidential election. The "collusion". How did he pull it off? How were the votes siphoned? You all are convinced it happened and Mueller will eventually prove it so obviously you all are way out ahead of him. So with your own facts, let me hear one of you lay it all out for us as Mueller will later on as you all are predicting?

How did Trump "collude" with the Russians and trick voters into voting for him instead of Hillary...or how did he steal votes intended for Hillary? This is the heart of the "collusion" charge and the chief complaint about the legitimacy of Trump's surprising victory. He cheated. OK...how?

Full year's paid subscription to BL to the first Leftist who can lay it all out for us....paid by me @atlkvb .

Any takers?
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
They haven't? Junior did at first, but that was it.

In your hypothetical you said that meeting with Russians is not collusion/conspiracy so it doesn’t matter. I was saying that if that hypothetical was true and it truly doesn’t matter...why lie about it?

And yes Don Jr lied. A couple times within a few days to be exact. And I’m surprised you don’t remember the email dictation story. That’s a pretty big red flag. Your tribe sure does enjoy its bubble.
 
Last edited:

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
In your hypothetical you said that just meeting with Russians is not collusion/conspiracy.

FIFY

I was saying that if that hypothetical was true and it truly doesn’t matter...why lie about it?

And yes Don Jr lied. A couple times within a few days to be exact. And I’m surprised you don’t remember the email dictation story. That’s a pretty big red flag. Your tribe sure does enjoy its bubble.

I don't get why you all care about lying all of a sudden. Lying to Congress under oath doesn't mean anything, so why would lying to the press, which has no legal ramifications?
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
FIFY



I don't get why you all care about lying all of a sudden. Lying to Congress under oath doesn't mean anything, so why would lying to the press, which has no legal ramifications?
Where’s the Dog barking about whataboutism on this post?
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
FIFY



I don't get why you all care about lying all of a sudden. Lying to Congress under oath doesn't mean anything, so why would lying to the press, which has no legal ramifications?

It’s not the lying, it is the reason for the lying. There is no reason to lie, right? Then why would you...repeatedly?
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Enough of you puppies yapping, I dont need to jump in. Besides, THE can handle himself. He’s a mod!!
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
Because Junior is a Russian asset being managed by Roger Stone.

My money is on “didn’t realize this was a big deal” due to how much they have dealt with Russians in the past combined with a tinge of “we would never face any consequences anyway” due to...never having to ever face any consequences.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
Enough of you puppies yapping, I dont need to jump in. Besides, THE can handle himself. He’s a mod!!

@DvlDog4WVU , you can read virtually every post in this thread by the Leftist detractors critical of Trump and in not one post will you find anything of any substance, based in substance, about something substantive, proven or factual! It's literally 100% personal attacks or smears or commentary but nothing about anything based on any one of Trump's numerous policy initiatives which truth be told, are making the biggest difference to non TDS voters.

It's probably the main reason I remain confident that Leftist Democrats are about to be buried in this Fall's mid term elections by their own hysteria because the vast majority of Americans are not paying any attention to their (Left's) constant yapping at Trump over their petty personality issues...American voters are watching Trump's effectiveness as a leader based on the results of his policy initiatives...this is something the Left either hasn't nor doesn't offer an any effective answer for. Why will folks vote for them? For what...pure Trump hatred? I think not.[eyeroll]

Ignore them, as you have said you will.
 
Last edited:

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Yawn, how is it a personal attack when the President calls the media the enemy of the people? Am I allowed to use my intelligence and compare that with what our constitution says or to other unsavory actors on the world stage in the past that uttered the same ********? Can I point out his outright lies? Would his fanboys just bury any negative information and ignore anything he does? America looks like the military not a Trump rally. And your boy tweets like a guilty sounding middle school cheerleader. We supposed to forget the made up **** about Obamas birth certificate or the fake outrage over Obamas supposedly unpresidential actions? (smoking, brown suit, mom jeans) In short, shut up and deal with it skippy, your boy brings the criticism on himself. But there was no collusion, and if there was it ain't a crime! lmfao. But then we shall see come November won't we? I love how his fanboys act like only "leftists" are embarrassed by their man crush.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I will pay a full year's subscription to Blue Lot to any Leftist who can explain how Trump stole votes from Hillary with the help of the Russians to win the '16 Presidential election. The "collusion". How did he pull it off? How were the votes siphoned? You all are convinced it happened and Mueller will eventually prove it so obviously you all are way out ahead of him. So with your own facts, let me hear one of you lay it all out for us as Mueller will later on as you all are predicting?

How did Trump "collude" with the Russians and trick voters into voting for him instead of Hillary...or how did he steal votes intended for Hillary? This is the heart of the "collusion" charge and the chief complaint about the legitimacy of Trump's surprising victory. He cheated. OK...how?

Full year's paid subscription to BL to the first Leftist who can lay it all out for us....paid by me @atlkvb .

Any takers?
I will repeat the question. Why all the chest beating with no victory in sight. Amazing that we have the same bunch who were giving guarantees that Hillary was a cinch to win. Absolutely made asses of themselves and they want to double down.

The man asked for someone with concrete statement and evidence to step forward and state your case and offer proof to substantiate your allegations. To keep it simple ,KISS, make it simple so everyone can understand what you are alleging. Compound sentences that are ambiguous and contradicting are not acceptable.

Who has balls to state what you find so obvious and nearly say for months on end? Who accepts? Should not be difficult until you are asked for a source.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You mean to tell me those Obama deepstaters lied to a Republican controlled Congress and Congress did nothing about it?

Oh the humanity!
Those two old gentlemen who had hearing for Hillary on Benghazi are about to get their collective asses in a sling when House has a hearing. They lied and was proven by testimony in later hearings. Some congressman raised the issue within last month or two.

Of course Hillary lied every time she opened her mouth. Do not know why some judge did not crucify her *** when she lied to his court. "Are there any more records?" "Clean with a rag?" "Uncertified people have access to certified files?"
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
Those two old gentlemen who had hearing for Hillary on Benghazi are about to get their collective asses in a sling when House has a hearing. They lied and was proven by testimony in later hearings. Some congressman raised the issue within last month or two.

Of course Hillary lied every time she opened her mouth. Do not know why some judge did not crucify her *** when she lied to his court. "Are there any more records?" "Clean with a rag?" "Uncertified people have access to certified files?"

She never volunteered the information that she was using that illegal server because she knew it was illegal! It all came out during those same Benghazi hearings by accident! That's why she denied it ever existed until it was proven it did exist, then once that was proven and Congress subpoenaed the hard drive she destroyed it after deleting 33,000 e-mails on it!

But we all know she didn't "intend" to do all of that. She really wanted to cooperate but she just "forgot" how to.[eyeroll] Comey saw her "intent" to cooperate but he also "forgot" why she was even under investigation so he exonerated her. She had no "intent" to break the law don't 'ya know?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
I will repeat the question. Why all the chest beating with no victory in sight. Amazing that we have the same bunch who were giving guarantees that Hillary was a cinch to win. Absolutely made asses of themselves and they want to double down.

The man asked for someone with concrete statement and evidence to step forward and state your case and offer proof to substantiate your allegations. To keep it simple ,KISS, make it simple so everyone can understand what you are alleging. Compound sentences that are ambiguous and contradicting are not acceptable.

Who has balls to state what you find so obvious and nearly say for months on end? Who accepts? Should not be difficult until you are asked for a source.

I do not expect I'll EVER have to pay off that bet mneilmont, and the longer it goes unanswered I will always refer to it to shut these malcontents up about their fake made-up "collusion" bull crap! They can spout it, but they can't prove it and neither can that fraud investigator Mueller! They're all just a bunch of fake *** phonies.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
Yawn, how is it a personal attack when the President calls the media the enemy of the people? Am I allowed to use my intelligence and compare that with what our constitution says or to other unsavory actors on the world stage in the past that uttered the same ********? Can I point out his outright lies? Would his fanboys just bury any negative information and ignore anything he does? America looks like the military not a Trump rally. And your boy tweets like a guilty sounding middle school cheerleader. We supposed to forget the made up **** about Obamas birth certificate or the fake outrage over Obamas supposedly unpresidential actions? (smoking, brown suit, mom jeans) In short, shut up and deal with it skippy, your boy brings the criticism on himself. But there was no collusion, and if there was it ain't a crime! lmfao. But then we shall see come November won't we? I love how his fanboys act like only "leftists" are embarrassed by their man crush.

Free money for you Keyser if you can prove any of the daily charges your side makes about Trump. Racist, failure, colluder...yada...yada...yada....

You want some free money Keyser, or are you going to keep running away from having to back up your bark or work for your pay?


Bye Keyser!!!!!!
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
Yawn, how is it a personal attack when the President calls the media the enemy of the people? Am I allowed to use my intelligence and compare that with what our constitution says or to other unsavory actors on the world stage in the past that uttered the same ********? Can I point out his outright lies? Would his fanboys just bury any negative information and ignore anything he does? America looks like the military not a Trump rally. And your boy tweets like a guilty sounding middle school cheerleader. We supposed to forget the made up **** about Obamas birth certificate or the fake outrage over Obamas supposedly unpresidential actions? (smoking, brown suit, mom jeans) In short, shut up and deal with it skippy, your boy brings the criticism on himself. But there was no collusion, and if there was it ain't a crime! lmfao. But then we shall see come November won't we? I love how his fanboys act like only "leftists" are embarrassed by their man crush.

Where is the factual, substantive, policy based discussion in this post? Anyone? OP?
 
Last edited:

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I do not expect I'll EVER have to pay off that bet mneilmont, and the longer it goes unanswered I will always refer to it to shut these malcontents up about their fake made-up "collusion" bull crap! They can spout it, but they can't prove it and neither can that fraud investigator Mueller! They're all just a bunch of fake *** phonies.
They were so hard assed in earlier thread that "words have meanings", ask them to look up collusion meaning and then tell us where it is illegal. Those guilty of collusion may have to return gains, but the term is not illegal.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,739
6,338
113
They were so hard assed in earlier thread that "words have meanings", ask them to look up collusion meaning and then tell us where it is illegal. Those guilty of collusion may have to return gains, but the term is not illegal.

Not only that mneilmont, but for this charge to still be 'floating' around out there for well over a year now and not one of them can point out any instance of it or demonstrate any proof of it is 100% laughable! Neither Mueller, nor Congressional investigators, nor media looking into it, NO ONE has produced any proof...not a scintilla of evidence behind this most specious charge considering how serious it is. Surely if it's as pervasive as these Leftists insist, it should be easy for one of them to both point to the obvious evidence and then explain how it all went down? They act as if it's so easy for anyone to see, but none of them can show it to us can they?o_O Trump got elected, that's all the proof we need I guess?:confused:

The fact they haven't/can't is proof to me this was nothing more than an elaborate scheme concocted by the butt hurt Left and the hostile, recalcitrant, anti-Trump media to discredit Trump and suggest his surprise election over that Hag was illegitimate. There simply can't be any other reason why we're still talking about something that hasn't been proved, can't be proved and most importantly won't ever be proved because IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.

I put my money where my belief is, where are the Leftists who know otherwise cashing in on this freebie proving me wrong...making me poorer, redistributing my income to themselves?[pfftt]

Frauds...all of them @mneilmont ...ignore them. I do.
 
Last edited:
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Let’s not bust criminals for breaking the law now?

No, but this is Whitewater all over again.

That’s a damn good question for Rod Rosenstein since he had all this several years ago and opted to not prosecute. I wonder why now?

My guess is, when Rosenstein is called, he will say he isn't allowed to comment about on going investigation. Seems to be the default check for bogus govt investigations.

You obviously haven't been paying attention. Rosenstein passed on prosecuting Manafort about 12 years go for this exact same thing. He will be called.

Solid posts. LOL!
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
This is White Water all over again.

***** is getting a President in trouble. Not something that he was originally investigated for.

I don't remember any convictions and guilty pleas of tax evasion, bank fraud, money laundering and campaign finance law violations associated with Whitewater....and the investigation is still ongoing.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
I don't remember any convictions and guilty pleas of tax evasion, bank fraud, money laundering and campaign finance law violations associated with Whitewater....and the investigation is still ongoing.
And does any of it touch Trump?
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Trump couldn't lead water down a drain but it looks like he may take the GOP willingly down the drain with him.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
No clue! There’s some speculation that he is “Individual-1” (the unnamed co-conspirator in the Cohen plea)...but that hasn’t been confirmed and maybe never will!
I guess I’m not seeing how even if he is that it’s illegal. I’m not a election and financial law scholar like yourself and Cunty, though. My assumption is that payoffs happen in every election by every candidate.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
I guess I’m not seeing how even if he is that it’s illegal. I’m not a election and financial law scholar like yourself and Cunty, though. My assumption is that payoffs happen in every election by every candidate.

Somebody alert Michael Cohen, his attorneys, the FBI and the SDNY Federal Court that DvlDog4WVU (who is not an election or financial law scholar but is from the internet) thinks that two of the counts Cohen pleaded guilty to are probably not illegal because every political candidate does it...like when Hillary Clinton paid off Johnny Sins.