NYT: Trump was shown highly classified intel that proves Putin personally ordered attack on the US

rog1187

All-American
May 29, 2001
70,024
5,613
113
Actually some people do care that the so called prez is a great big liar. I'd say that most Americans like for their prez to have credibility. Some like yourself don't care. Good for you.
I'd say not enough cared during the 2016 election or else they would have put HRC in the WH.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Are any of those relevant to the topic at hand? Why the deflection, mod? I asked you a simple question that is directly related to how much of the ******** trump spews do you buy. And you come back with some **** like this?Not a good look, mod. Be better.

LOL! You gone.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
I'm cool with it. As long as they conspire with the Democrats to define narratives, hide stories, or push other's, then they are not objective and minding the store. They are not what they claim to be, and are enemies of the people.

What was fake news about the summit? This is directly what he is referring to.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
If Trump and his admin have done nothing wrong then they have nothing to fear.

They had no reason to start the investigation in the first place. It's not a matter of fear, it's a matter of justice.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
I'm cool with it. As long as they conspire with the Democrats to define narratives, hide stories, or push other's, then they are not objective and minding the store. They are not what they claim to be, and are enemies of the people.
lol
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Your boy, Baby Trump, lies more than anyone I can recall in my lifetime and I was in college when Nixon was president.
You obviously do not remember that fellow called Obama. He chose to lie when the truth was right before him. He was simply a liar. I make no excuses for Trump. I do think it is a game with his opposition. He has no reason to be honest with the enemy media or opposition in political matters. Would probably prefer to set them up to expose them - again,
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
They had no reason to start the investigation in the first place. It's not a matter of fear, it's a matter of justice.
Yeah right and justice is in the process of being served. Jail cells are waiting to be filled and it won't be long.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Quote it.
Wednesday's cleanup effort was also viewed with more skepticism because of Trump's equally difficult-to-believe backpedaling a day before, when he insisted he had misspoken when he said before Putin that he didn't see any reason why it "would" be Russia that hacked the US election.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Wednesday's cleanup effort was also viewed with more skepticism because of Trump's equally difficult-to-believe backpedaling a day before, when he insisted he had misspoken when he said before Putin that he didn't see any reason why it "would" be Russia that hacked the US election.

So you quoted one word from Trump. "would". Nope.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
Yup, gone. One red hat and cut off tee away from being just another barking seal behind him at a rally.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
And that's a video of the whole segment. Quote his specific words where he takes Putin's side over US intel. It's not a hard task guys! Unless. Wait, you're just taking CNN's word for it.



CNN and every other legitimate news outlet on planet earth.

It’s not hard to find if you take the blinders off.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48


CNN and every other legitimate news outlet on planet earth.

It’s not hard to find if you take the blinders off.


He didn't say Russia didn't do it, he did not take Putin's side. #fakenews

Now a set of questions for you, since Trump led with it...

  • Did the FBI look at the servers?
  • If not, who did?
  • What did the FBI receive?
  • What person with that organization did look at them?
  • Who hired that group/person?
  • Are those that hired them close political friends with the person that looked at them?

Knowing the answers to those questions, could the Russia narrative, even for the DNC servers, just be part of the Clinton narrative? Where are those servers?
 
Last edited:

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
He didn't say Russia didn't do it, he did not take Putin's side. #fakenews

Now a set of questions for you, since Trump led with it...

  • Did the FBI look at the servers?
  • If not, who did?
  • What did the FBI receive?
  • What person with that organization did look at them?
  • Who hired that group/person?
  • Are those that hired them close political friends with the person that looked at them?

Knowing those answers to those facts, could the Russia narrative, even for the DNC servers, just be part of the Clinton narrative? Where are those servers?

Oh, and as stated in the indictment last Friday, per Crowdstrike, Russia was in the servers for months after Crowdstrike had publicly stated they had cleaned everything up and kicked them out.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
Trump said that despite what his IC tells him he sees no reason to believe them. You can believe what you want.

It’s one of two things. He either believes the 24 hour later retraction of one word that doesn’t make in any sense in context of the rest of the answer he gave.

Or he is being intentionally obtuse. Either is a terrible look.
 

rog1187

All-American
May 29, 2001
70,024
5,613
113
It’s one of two things. He either believes the 24 hour later retraction of one word that doesn’t make in any sense in context of the rest of the answer he gave.

Or he is being intentionally obtuse. Either is a terrible look.
Sure terrible look...but what are or what have his actions been?
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Trump said that despite what his IC tells him he sees no reason to believe them. You can believe what you want.

There was only one IC involved I trust, Admiral Rogers. He stated under oath:

"I wouldn’t call it a discrepancy, I’d call it an honest difference of opinion between three different organizations and in the end I made that call.…It didn’t have the same level of sourcing and the same level of multiple sources."
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
He didn't say Russia didn't do it, he did not take Putin's side. #fakenews

Now a set of questions for you, since Trump led with it...

  • Did the FBI look at the servers?
  • If not, who did?
  • What did the FBI receive?
  • What person with that organization did look at them?
  • Who hired that group/person?
  • Are those that hired them close political friends with the person that looked at them?

Knowing the answers to those questions, could the Russia narrative, even for the DNC servers, just be part of the Clinton narrative? Where are those servers?

More conspiracy theory ********. I would have thought that you would have learned but...nope...way too far gone.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
There was only one IC involved I trust, Admiral Rogers. He stated under oath:

"I wouldn’t call it a discrepancy, I’d call it an honest difference of opinion between three different organizations and in the end I made that call.…It didn’t have the same level of sourcing and the same level of multiple sources."
This is in regards to what?
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Why argue with these deniers? Trump said that our free press is the enemy not Russia or Putin, let em support that, they can blame illegal aliens for the backlash vote when it comes, who cares.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
More conspiracy theory ********. I would have thought that you would have learned but...nope...way too far gone.

It's not ********. The FBI didn't even assess server images, they took Crowdstrike's word for it. Crowdstrike was hired by Clinton's attorneys. Rogers said it wasn't sourced well and have multiple sources, and I believe him. It might've been Russia, but with what has been determined so far by a third party, I don't take it as fact.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
They had no reason to start the investigation in the first place. It's not a matter of fear, it's a matter of justice.

That he took Putin's side over US intel. He did no such thing.

Not if a ton of evidence will be thrown out due to prosecutorial malfeasance.

 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
It's not ********. The FBI didn't even assess server images, they took Crowdstrike's word for it. Crowdstrike was hired by Clinton's attorneys. Rogers said it wasn't sourced well and have multiple sources, and I believe him. It might've been Russia, but with what has been determined so far by a third party, I don't take it as fact.

HILLARY!!!!

yea...it’s conspiracy theory ********. But I’m not going to try to convince you otherwise. You’ll figure it out in time like all the others...and then there will be a new one to take its place. Circle of life.