This guy quoted on
Metronews kind of sums up my thoughts:
The whole combination of things just seems a little absurd to me.
1. The rush to buy the place without knowing how much it's actually worth. Well as it turns out $5.2 million was about $2.7 million too much.
2. Not knowing how to pay for it. I think one of the council members was quoted as saying he's an idea guy. He ran it by the finance people (or whoever the city has) and they said they could figure out a way to pay for it, so that's good enough for him. I mean, there are a lot of things I'd like to have that I *could* pay for, but that doesn't mean that it's a good or fiscally responsible idea. Seems to me knowing the exact way they're going to pay the bills is a pretty important piece of the puzzle. And even if they do figure out how to pay for it, it's probably worth asking if that's the best use of city funds.
3. No real idea what they're going to do with the property once they buy it. Put in trails? Make it another arboretum? Something else? Just seemed like they were going to buy the place and figure it out later.