Was the ABA wrong?

EERs 3:16

Redshirt
Oct 17, 2001
73,677
25
0
If Clinton were indicted and became president, she probably could pardon herself, according to Banzhaf. And if she did that, and someone wanted to challenge the pardon, it is doubtful any potential plaintiff would have standing to sue, he says.

Judge Richard Posner of the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals signaled agreement with that view in a 1999 book about the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Posner wrote that “It has generally been inferred from the breadth of the constitutional language that the president can indeed pardon himself.” The Wall Street Journal Law Blog noted Posner’s stand.

Posner added that it was unlikely the Supreme Court at that time would be “bold enough, in the teeth of the constitutional language, to read into the pardon clause an exception for self-pardoning. Unlikely, but not inconceivable.”

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/does_presidents_pardon_authority_extend_to_a_self_pardon/
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,850
281
83
If Clinton were indicted and became president, she probably could pardon herself, according to Banzhaf. And if she did that, and someone wanted to challenge the pardon, it is doubtful any potential plaintiff would have standing to sue, he says.

Judge Richard Posner of the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals signaled agreement with that view in a 1999 book about the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Posner wrote that “It has generally been inferred from the breadth of the constitutional language that the president can indeed pardon himself.” The Wall Street Journal Law Blog noted Posner’s stand.

Posner added that it was unlikely the Supreme Court at that time would be “bold enough, in the teeth of the constitutional language, to read into the pardon clause an exception for self-pardoning. Unlikely, but not inconceivable.”

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/does_presidents_pardon_authority_extend_to_a_self_pardon/
It's academic when it comes to HC and it still is mostly regarding DT because if he did then impeachment would likely swiftly follow which would bring its own problems.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
It's academic when it comes to HC and it still is mostly regarding DT because if he did then impeachment would likely swiftly follow which would bring its own problems.
You keep saying that but who is going to impeach him?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,209
3,292
113
It's academic when it comes to HC and it still is mostly regarding DT because if he did then impeachment would likely swiftly follow which would bring its own problems.
Right, so the two situations are exactly the same. You all wet yourself over one of them and didn’t pay attention to the second one. Got it, thanks.