The Dems’ Farrakhan Problem...WSJ

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
696
0
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dems-farrakhan-problem-1517270636

Hillary Clinton tried to make Louis Farrakhan an issue when she ran against Barack Obama in 2008. The Nation of Islam leader—infamous for calling Judaism a “gutter religion”—had praised the future president as “the hope of the entire world.” In a February debate, Mrs. Clinton demanded that Mr. Obama reject Mr. Farrakhan’s support, insisting: “There’s a difference between denouncing and rejecting.” Mr. Obama obliged and added: “There’s no formal offer of help from Minister Farrakhan that would involve me rejecting it.”



Three years earlier, Mr. Obama posed for a photo with Mr. Farrakhan at a Congressional Black Caucus gathering. The photographer, journalist Askia Muhammad, told the liberal site Talking Points Memo that a CBC staffer contacted him “sort of in a panic” about the photo. “I promised and made arrangements to give the picture to Leonard Farrakhan, ” Louis Farrakhan’s son-in-law and chief of staff. But he kept a copy, which he released last week.

Mrs. Clinton might have become president had the photo come out a decade earlier. It isn’t clear from the photo to what degree Mr. Obama was associated with Mr. Farrakhan. But the Congressional Black Caucus’s association is scandalous. Its members have met with Mr. Farrakhan on at least one other occasion.

On Jan. 13-14, 2006, the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity held hearings in New Orleans and Gulfport, Miss., on the federal government’s response to Hurricane Katrina. After the New Orleans hearing, at least four CBC members headed to St. Augustine Church to meet Mr. Farrakhan, who had attended part of the hearing.

In a video posted to YouTube in 2009, Reps. Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee of California, Al Green of Texas and William Jefferson of Louisiana can been seen exchanging hugs and handshakes with Mr. Farrakhan, then talking with him about coordinating their public responses to Katrina.

After praising the representatives for their performance at the hearings, Mr. Farrakhan says: “Tell me how I can be of service.”

Ms. Waters responds: “I think we need to get together and talk about how we’re going to put New Orleans on the national agenda.” (I emailed Ms. Waters’s press secretary Tuesday to ask if such a meeting ever took place. The press secretary replied that Ms. Waters was traveling and unable to answer.)

Mr. Jefferson, who represented New Orleans, explains to Mr. Farrakhan how difficult it is to get colleagues from elsewhere in the country interested in Katrina relief.

Mr. Farrakhan tells the group that “this is where the battle lines need to be drawn,” but “without a force that makes, that creates the political will,” their efforts would be wasted. The video ends with Mr. Farrakhan describing Katrina as a judgment from God, akin to the biblical plagues.

Mr. Farrakhan went much further in a sermon titled “A People Robbed and Spoiled,” which he delivered that weekend at St. Augustine Church. “Your problem is you are not now nor have ever been a citizen of the United States of America,” he told the congregants. “You are a slave to white America. It bothers me to hear you crying how you’re an American but they treat you like a slave. It bothers me that you are willing to fight and die for something that is not willing to sacrifice nothing for you.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies Mr. Farrakhan as a “black separatist” and the Nation of Islam as a hate group. Alan Dershowitz reacted to the Obama-Farrakhan photo by saying he would not have campaigned for Mr. Obama had he known about it: “There must be zero tolerance for anti-Semites, whether they are David Duke or Louis Farrakhan. No one should associate with either. The suppression of that photo is disgraceful.”

He has a point. If Republican lawmakers were holding strategy sessions with Mr. Duke, their party would rightly be held to account. Why shouldn’t the Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus be held to the same standard?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113
Here's another one. Blacks support the wall, and securing the border! Media doesn't report this, but Dems are driving away many Blacks with their preference for illegals over native born citizens. Blacks think Dems care more about Hispanics and Blacks do see themselves as Americans first.

Dems are simply counting votes, but not remembering to add in Blacks who have been their most reliably consistent block...until now. Trump is cutting into perceptions that Republicans are all racist because Blacks are getting hired, meanwhile Democrats are telling Blacks theiy're not as important as Hispanics especially if they not are illegal. Blacks will remember come November.
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
458
0
Hell, just take Farrakhan out of the equation and the democratic party still has a racist and anti-Semite as the Deputy Chair of the DNC.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113
If Republican lawmakers were holding strategy sessions with Mr. Duke, their party would rightly be held to account. Why shouldn’t the Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus be held to the same standard?

Because the Left has always been insincere on matters of race. It's simply a strategy they use to create guilt among Americans (specifically White Americans) to convince them that they have acquired their wealth at the expense of poor Blacks or other minorities and it's time to redistribute it more fairly.

The irony is, the Left insists on keeping Blacks in poverty, dependent on Government handouts, and hopelessly consigned to second rate status. If they were truly concerned about advancing the fortunes of Black folks they'd stop their ongoing opposition to tax free enterprise zones and school choice vouchers both of which are overwhelmingly favored by Blacks.

Come to think of it, have you heard anyone on the Left cheering for or thanking Trump for the record low Black unemployment rate? I thought they were so concerned about Blacks getting jobs? Why their silence over record numbers of Blacks now finding work and getting hired under Trump's economy?

Read the first line of this post for your answer.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113
Perfect example of what I'm talking about. South Carolina Sentor Tim Scott has sposnored the Investment opportunity act...essentially allowing tax free capital gains investing in distressed inner city areas among other places economically distressed typically populated by minority groups.

Read about it here:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewyang/2016/04/28/investing-in-opportunity/#21b183ec1f1f

Guess who voted against it? (hint: starts with a "D")
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...oted-against-the-Investing-in-Opportunity-Act

So the Left really cares about improving the lives of minorities hard hit by lack of economic opportunities right? Then why did every Democrat vote agianst this legislation?

Ans:
From post #8
"Because the Left has always been insincere on matters of race. It's simply a strategy they use to create guilt among Americans (specifically White Americans) to convince them that they have acquired their wealth at the expense of poor Blacks or other minorities and it's time to redistribute it more fairly."
 
Last edited:

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
696
0
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113

He also lied about his close relationship to Rev. Jeremiah Wright...who espouses some of the same hateful rhetoric against White people and America that Farrakhan does. Obama "disowned" him and says he doesn't remember any of Wright's diatribes against White America, but Wright was his Pastor for 20 years and Married them (Obama & Michelle)
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113

I'd challenge any one on the Left accusing Trump of being a racist to find anything he's said about Blacks that even remotely resembles what Farrakhan has said publicly about Jews or White people. Just one thing.

They won't, because they can't. Yet Trump's a racist, and Farrakhan is simply "misunderstood" or "misquoted".
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113
Some of these thread revivals are pure gold! It's interesting reading yourself from back in the day. I still like me! You too @WVU82 [winking]
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,587
7,699
113

He says they're Devils. Called the Jewish Faith a "gutter Religion". Thinks the Catholic Church is run by the Italian Mafia...La Cosa Nostra.