Sessions reopens Uranium One investigation

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
It didn't get any attention buried in a thread, so I'll give it a new one. Sessions plays his first card.

link
 

BoremanSouth

Redshirt
Jul 28, 2016
1,715
0
0
"I'm a sneaky little villain!"
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
1) I thought Sessions recused himself.



B) didn't nine different agencies approve the deal?

3) how did the Benghazi investigation turn out after spending over 3 years and over 7 million dollars?

D) what is the term you guys like to use? Nothingburger?

Don't get me wrong, if anyone broke any law, prosecute them.

I think this is an attempt to discredit Mueller's investigation and distract from it. Politicians are crooked and corrupt.

You got to hand it to Hillary. She's the most powerful and conniving politician in the United States of America. She had nine different agencies go along with her plan. She's good.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,258
6,957
113
1) I thought Sessions recused himself.



B) didn't nine different agencies approve the deal?

3) how did the Benghazi investigation turn out after spending over 3 years and over 7 million dollars?

D) what is the term you guys like to use? Nothingburger?

Don't get me wrong, if anyone broke any law, prosecute them.

I think this is an attempt to discredit Mueller's investigation and distract from it. Politicians are crooked and corrupt.

You got to hand it to Hillary. She's the most powerful and conniving politician in the United States of America. She had nine different agencies go along with her plan. She's good.

Mueller has discredited his own investigation by having too many known partisans doing the investigations.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Mueller has discredited his own investigation by having too many known partisans doing the investigations.

He's a Republican. Rosenstein is a Republican. No one had any objections when Meuller was appointed. Now that trump's balls are in a vice, it's time to smear the investigator. GTFOH.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
He's a Republican. Rosenstein is a Republican. No one had any objections when Meuller was appointed.

It's not partisan. It's those who want to remain in power vs. those who want the old regime gone. It's not necessarily along party lines.

Now that trump's balls are in a vice, it's time to smear the investigator. GTFOH.

What planet are you from? What planet are you currently on?
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
It's not partisan. It's those who want to remain in power vs. those who want the old regime gone. It's not necessarily along party lines.



What planet are you from? What planet are you currently on?

Your dogs name is Spot.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
1) I thought Sessions recused himself.



B) didn't nine different agencies approve the deal?

3) how did the Benghazi investigation turn out after spending over 3 years and over 7 million dollars?

D) what is the term you guys like to use? Nothingburger?

Don't get me wrong, if anyone broke any law, prosecute them.

I think this is an attempt to discredit Mueller's investigation and distract from it. Politicians are crooked and corrupt.

You got to hand it to Hillary. She's the most powerful and conniving politician in the United States of America. She had nine different agencies go along with her plan. She's good.

Cuntrywrong again
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
He's a Republican. Rosenstein is a Republican. No one had any objections when Meuller was appointed. Now that trump's balls are in a vice, it's time to smear the investigator. GTFOH.
You are one ignorant fool. Turn off CNN and get informed.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,258
6,957
113
He's a Republican. Rosenstein is a Republican. No one had any objections when Meuller was appointed. Now that trump's balls are in a vice, it's time to smear the investigator. GTFOH.
when all your investigators are all contributors to Clinton, it's hard to make a claim of impartiality.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
when all your investigators are all contributors to Clinton, it's hard to make a claim of impartiality.
1) not all are - 6 total ($62,000 was the total amount given to Clinton). 6 have never given money to anyone at a federal level.

2) Democrats CAN prosecute and charge other democrats....it happens. Some people put country over party. I think Mueller is doing that very thing.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,209
3,292
113
Democrats CAN prosecute and charge other democrats....it happens. Some people put country over party. I think Mueller is doing that very thing.
Just not apparently under the Obama administration as we continue to learn.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,258
6,957
113
I don’t think that’s true. But hey, you all hate Obama.....I do accept that truth.
IF you accept the truth, then you would admit that Obama and his liberal cronies ran the most crooked administration of all time.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,934
1,638
113
1) not all are - 6 total ($62,000 was the total amount given to Clinton). 6 have never given money to anyone at a federal level.

2) Democrats CAN prosecute and charge other democrats....it happens. Some people put country over party. I think Mueller is doing that very thing.
It's not just about the contributions......it's also about some of their deep Democrat connections. How many of Mueller's team have Republican connections. I think you would agree that the latest political revelations regarding Team Mueller/FBI are very troubling.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
It's not just about the contributions......it's also about some of their deep Democrat connections. How many of Mueller's team have Republican connections. I think you would agree that the latest political revelations regarding Team Mueller/FBI are very troubling.
Quarles (one of the biased democrat donors) also donated to a Republican.

Evidence is evidence.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
I don’t think that’s true. But hey, you all hate Obama.....I do accept that truth.

How Flynn could be charged with lying to the FBI, but Huma and Hillary weren't shows a level of cover from the Obama administration.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
What did Huma and Hillary lie about?

We don't know that Hillbag lied to the FBI. I don't think transcripts were created. Imagine that.

Huma and the other sub chick lied to the FBI saying they didn't know about the server. They received immunity as long they gave up their equipment so the FBI could destroy it.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,850
281
83
We don't know that Hillbag lied to the FBI. I don't think transcripts were created. Imagine that.

Huma and the other sub chick lied to the FBI saying they didn't know about the server. They received immunity as long they gave up their equipment so the FBI could destroy it.
another whiff.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
So you still didn't prove Hillary nor Huma lied.

Clinton's 302 Link

Huma's 302 notes Link


"Abedin, who did not know Clinton used a private server for her emails, told the bureau in an April interview that she used the account on the clintonemail.com domain only for issues related to the Secretary’s personal affairs, such as communicating with her friends. For work-related records, Abedin primarily used the email account provided to her by the State Department."



Notes from Cheryl Mills' 302 Link

“Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton’s DoS tenure,” notes from the interview read. “Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time.”


 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Clinton's 302 Link

Huma's 302 notes Link


"Abedin, who did not know Clinton used a private server for her emails, told the bureau in an April interview that she used the account on the clintonemail.com domain only for issues related to the Secretary’s personal affairs, such as communicating with her friends. For work-related records, Abedin primarily used the email account provided to her by the State Department."



Notes from Cheryl Mills' 302 Link

“Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton’s DoS tenure,” notes from the interview read. “Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time.”




Damn Casey, another swing and miss. Your arms must be worn out.

This was interesting though.

The truth is much less explosive. There is no indication the emails in question were withheld by Clinton during the investigation, the law enforcement official told Newsweek, nor does the discovery suggest she did anything illegal. Also, none of the emails were to or from Clinton, the official said. Moreover, despite the widespread claims in the media that this development had prompted the FBI to “reopen” the case, it did not; such investigations are never actually closed, and it is common for law enforcement to discover new information that needs to be examined.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Damn Casey, another swing and miss. Your arms must be worn out.

This was interesting though.

The truth is much less explosive. There is no indication the emails in question were withheld by Clinton during the investigation, the law enforcement official told Newsweek, nor does the discovery suggest she did anything illegal. Also, none of the emails were to or from Clinton, the official said. Moreover, despite the widespread claims in the media that this development had prompted the FBI to “reopen” the case, it did not; such investigations are never actually closed, and it is common for law enforcement to discover new information that needs to be examined.

fact check: Lie