CNN: This is an apple
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
I heard something profound today. Where is the evidence the Russians hacked those DNC servers which allegedly is how they got hold of all the dirt on Hillary? The DNC won't even let the FBI examine how or if they were compromised, so how do we know the Russians hacked them? Where is that evidence? The whole collusion story is based on that singular event...so where is the evidence?
Here read this:
Forget "collusion"...can Mueller prove Russia committed cyberespionage?
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...es-mueller-have-proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt
So you're saying that there may be one Trump associate who may not be going to prison? That's pretty cool.
Because idiots in Congress lack the ability to understand the concept of context.
Perfect example of the dangers of fake news. You fell for it and still believe it. Low information voting rube.
So 18 national security related agencies have said it was the Russians. I bet those agencies would differ on points of how they did it. Therefore, proving they did it in the court of law would be difficult at best simply because any defense could poke holes in probably every facet of the prosecution's argument because it will be so very technical.
Ha! Good one! I guess he's on the long list of Trumpettes with bad memories about their contacts with russians.
The DNC claimed the Russians hacked their servers and used the information they pilfered in "collusion" with the Trump campaign to damage Hillary. That's the narrative. So why won't they let the FBI in to see how the Russians hacked them? Seems to me that's the quickest way to unravel the collusion scheme and prove Trump stole votes from Hillary but there is no evidence the Russians actually did hack the DNC servers! If they did, where is that evidence? Read the article I linked to in this thread. He explains why the whole collusion case rises and falls on that non existent evidence.
of course......and now we see how the common German citizens were persuaded to gas, burn, torture, and otherwise execute millions including their neighbors.
I read it.....even if they had the servers, it might not prove the Russians did it. There are other ways to gain evidence.....but it wouldn't fit your bias. Therefore, you ignore any other potential option.
Yup, you're right.
"In an interview with NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt at the Aspen Security Forum, Coats said that the reason only four of 17 intelligence agencies signed onto the January assessment describing the Russian effort is that the other agencies were not involved in gathering and analyzing the intelligence."
What's sad is that the 17 agencies bs was debunked how many months ago? Idiocracy
I'm not biased my Man. I just asked if those servers were hacked, where is the evidence? I don't know if the Russians did it or not, neither does the DNC so why don't they just let the FBI forensics specialists get in there to look at them to find some answers? What are they hiding?
Last edited: