Watch more accusers come out of the woods in the closing days to the election.welp, there goes that narrative.
So he didn't try to molest nine women when they were underage?
I'm sure he did something.....I've already said the guy is a real creep. My only point on this whole deal is the timing. Watch all the "breaking news" crawlers all go away in a few days. You're a smart person and you know I'm right.So he didn't try to molest nine women when they were underage?
I'm sure he did something.....I've already said the guy is a real creep. My only point on this whole deal is the timing. Watch all the "breaking news" crawlers all go away in a few days. You're a smart person and you know I'm right.
Was Weinstein running for the Senate?You have the same complaint on the Weinstein accusers and their "timing" as well?
"America was great during slavery?"
At a campaign event earlier this year, an audience member asked Moore for his opinion on when the last time America was "great." Moore responded: "I think it was great at the time when families were united—even though we had slavery—they cared for one another…. Our families were strong, our country had a direction." The individual who asked the question was among the only African-Americans in attendance at the rally. In stating this, Moore seemingly implied he'd be able to overlook the enslavement of other human beings as long as families are "united," an interesting perspective from a man accused of repeatedly preying on young girls.
Keep trying, maybe some crap you throw will eventually stick.
No defense of Moore from me."America was great during slavery?"
At a campaign event earlier this year, an audience member asked Moore for his opinion on when the last time America was "great." Moore responded: "I think it was great at the time when families were united—even though we had slavery—they cared for one another…. Our families were strong, our country had a direction." The individual who asked the question was among the only African-Americans in attendance at the rally. In stating this, Moore seemingly implied he'd be able to overlook the enslavement of other human beings as long as families are "united," an interesting perspective from a man accused of repeatedly preying on young girls.
Do you not believe he said it? It was documented at a public campaign meeting last night.
No it wasn't.
It's all about the Senate seat. I don't think you want me to paint you into another corner regarding political ethics........Anyway...whats one more slime-ball in Congress really do.Do you not believe he said it? It was documented at a public campaign meeting last night.
trump was right. He could shoot people and wouldn't lose voters. I think the same is true with Moore supporters. And I'm the racist? LMAO!
OK, my mistake, earlier this year. Do you not believe he said it?
It's all about the Senate seat. I don't think you want me to paint you into another corner regarding political ethics.
No, you’re the racist because you called a black man of opposing ideology a House N***** and proceeded to stereotype him as needing Govt assistance. Moore could be and likely is as well. Now what’s your point?Do you not believe he said it? It was documented at a public campaign meeting last night.
trump was right. He could shoot people and wouldn't lose voters. I think the same is true with Moore supporters. And I'm the racist? LMAO!
No, you’re the racist because you called a black man of opposing ideology a House N***** and proceeded to stereotype him as needing Govt assistance. Moore could be and likely is as well. Now what’s your point?
Well, at least you’ve graduated to acknowledging you called him a House N*****. And as to the latter, if you’d like to clear up how he votes against his self interests, I’d love to hear it. He’s asked you about 10 times and refuse to answer him. Floor is yours.Who said anything about anyone needing government assistance? Find the post. Good luck.
Keep trying, maybe some crap you throw will eventually stick.
So you support Moore?
I support a Democrat not getting the seat. Elect Moore.
We get it. Party over country.
She admitted to adding date. #FAKENEWSwelp, there goes that narrative.
Yeah, this story isn't going away.She admitted to adding date. #FAKENEWS
Plus, she was the one that hired Gloria Allred. That's more damning then today's news. Still doesn't answer the initial story.welp, there goes that narrative.
ExactlyThe "add-on" to the yearbook signature goes to another issue, one that has been bothering me since these harassment charges started surfacing. If a man is alleged to have harassed, and denies it, shouldn't we reserve judgment until the evidence on both sides is presented? Whether it's Roy Moore or Al Franken, he is entitled to some notion of due process. The jump to presumption of guilt is troubling. Now, if the guy admits he did it (i.e., on a videotape on a bus), or is captured in a photo as he goes to cup her breasts while she's asleep, slap him upside the head, figuratively. But for allegations denied, both sides should be heard before punishing him.
"America was great during slavery?"
At a campaign event earlier this year, an audience member asked Moore for his opinion on when the last time America was "great." Moore responded: "I think it was great at the time when families were united—even though we had slavery—they cared for one another…. Our families were strong, our country had a direction." The individual who asked the question was among the only African-Americans in attendance at the rally. In stating this, Moore seemingly implied he'd be able to overlook the enslavement of other human beings as long as families are "united," an interesting perspective from a man accused of repeatedly preying on young girls.
Well that was never an accusation. I think it was two, but now only one, and that one has story issues.
You realize he slipped Trump’s access Hollywood faux pas in there right?Exactly
It was 8 on November 17th....and none of them remained anonymous, all of them divulged their names.
http://time.com/5029172/roy-moore-accusers/
http://time.com/5029172/roy-moore-accusers/
But "you're not defending him", right?
I would qualify your response. He may have been a creep some 40 years ago. I suggest he was a very immature young man who truly lacked social graces. He seems to have approached young ladies in ways that pst society would question. However, that WAS 40 years ago. He married (and I presume he was closer to his age), raised a family that includes grandchildren, was a successful politician (whether or not you agree with his stance on several issues, and did not repeat the patterns for which he is being accused (and it now appears somewhat fraudulently). One can easily argue that he has had 40 years of rehabilitation. Have we not heard for decades (often from the left) that the tole of the courts is to rehabilitate the offender? The history of Judge Moore sounds like a pretty good success story to me. The same cannot be said for Franken. Several of his alleged acts have occurred within the last few years. Not at all a similar case to Judge Moore.I'm sure he did something.....I've already said the guy is a real creep. My only point on this whole deal is the timing. Watch all the "breaking news" crawlers all go away in a few days. You're a smart person and you know I'm right.
What timing issues for Weinstein?You have the same complaint on the Weinstein accusers and their "timing" as well?