17 Sealed Indictments
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
laughing emoji
Malice author, sex crime survivor & investigative journalist censored by MSM for covering Clinton corruption, sex trafficking & Seth Rich. Pedogate is REAL
The sealed indictments don't exist because you make fun of the author of the tweet? I'm sure not all are for Mueller's investigation, but still.
"that lot" that he rolls with these days is running this country for the next 7 years and comments like the one you just made are a big reason why....so keep em coming.....but put on your cowboy hat and pour a glass of chardonnay first
Yeah, I don't think so. Biff has 38% and much of the GOP is slowly pulling away from him.
Dreams of your forefather.
If election today, Trump would probably still win. Link
And I'd still vote Negan.
Hoping cucks do an end run with someone else. Biff’s agenda willl have tumbleweed blowing through it by then.
Not yet, but it will be. When you're standing there with a hand full of **** and Trump has just been re-elected I'm gonna laugh and laugh and laugh.
Seriously, assuming the tax plan passes in its current form, we could potentially see +4% growth and Trump will start being revered much like Reagan was. You all better dial up the propaganda machine because the Tax Bill is a hit.
Oh he def could be re-elected, depends on lots of things. I just look at the fact that a horrible candidate beat him by almost 3 million votes and his agenda hasn’t gotten off the ground and that 38% was actially 41% not too long ago. Pretty obvious reelection will require a yuge change in political trajectory.
A hit until it reached the Senate where we have the 'ever popular', anti everythu=ing that might benefit the American public (Mr, JohnMcCain). Has he and his few henchmen not already stated that the bill is DOA in the Senate? Too bad this man is allowed to ruin life for the entire Nation because he dislikes Trump and is a full fledged moron in addition.
I saw a story about a provision in the House version that big business is against. It's basically a 20% tax on anything a multinational company brings into the US or ships out of the US. That won't help build business in the US. Hopefully that provision gets yanked.
Also, many on the right admit that growth alone won't erase the projected deficit increases of this proposal. That's also before an infrastructure bill gets introduced.
I don't say these things because I oppose tax reform. I don't have a specific problem with the idea behind the current proposal, although deficit is still a concern. We need a tax structure that pays all the bills when the economy is ok. That gives the fed a surplus when we are booming and a deficit when the economy is bad. It's a sane way to approach the issue. I'm also fine with spending cuts. I think the best way to start that process is to look at the process of government spending and totally revamp it.
Trump's trying to grow the economy you want it smaller?
Trump's trying to shrink the Government you want it bigger?
Lower Taxes, you want 'em higher?
End Obamacare you want to expand it?
You claim only 38% of the people agree with Trumps' agenda, so the rest obviously agree with yours?
Carry on...and wait for the results of the next election cycle to wake you up from your wet dream.
Last edited:
Hey Crackhead--You think Biff wants to shrink Govt? He's planned to move every dollar saved from program reductions to military spending. So stop with the smaller govt BS cuz Biff isn't about that at all.
If economics was that easy, there would never be economic issues in this nation. Anyone who doesn’t see that an uptick in natural business cycles was imminent, knows less about economics than I do. Trump gets credit for optimism in investment right now. The tax bill will help increase this uptick to a boom, but there’s always the downturn.....always.
Voting Tea Party? I have no idea any more. Fiscal responsibility is something that went away long ago. We’re just gonna ride this ***** until she bucks us I reckon.
Always honest. I’m a liberal, and I want fiscal responsibility. It seems that the most basic principles of success seem to elude politicians.....cutting isn’t popular on the left, but the right loves it, so I’m amazed we aren’t balanced on The Hill.
The Right is supposed to love it but they’ve been spending the same as the left for over a decade. I somewhat am ok with the Rights spending plans because there is a more quantifiable and tangible ROI associated with it, at least in the defense sector. Same could be said for the left on a couple of items. Understanding the biggest expenditure is Medicaid and Medicare, I don’t know how we fix that until the boomers start dying off.
I agree, but we are likely staring down the barrel of a $1 trillion or more infrastructure bill in the near future, probably before the midterm elections. ACA repeal is dead in the water, so no fed savings there. Where are the cuts? Even before this tax proposal the bidget propsals weren't moving to balance anything.
I look at defense spending, and I'm not sure we're getting the best bang for our buck, pun intended. The industry is too politicized. Manufacturers spread out plants in so many districts that no one in Congress wants to cut programs the military doesn't even want. Within the department you have silly stuff done to appease generals ( see the remodel at the AF Academy as an easy example). There is room to cut in defense while still improving our ability to defend.
It's not....same dollars spent. I'm state funded and what fed $$ I do get is via excise taxes from sporting goods, so I'm unfazed by Biff's blundery.
Why can't you just make your point minus the juvenille name calling? Does that make what you posted any less correct?
Stop acting like a 3rd grader and just make your case with facts and some semblence of adult intelligence minus the romper room behavior OK?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...gCNUQFggpMAE&usg=AOvVaw3P5lZfB_yBiBd3Hk3rYD9j
This was a good idea...cut one penny off every dollar Uncle Sam spends and the budget balances in a few years.
Guess who voted against it?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...2Ap0QFggmMAA&usg=AOvVaw28onhLZBg943gkxbgrebPS
A pig with lipstick is still a pig. And a 60B increase in military spending with no net loss in fed budget is still big govt.
in fact, I'm willing to bet it will grow....bigly. Biff proposed massive cuts to EPA, USFWS, USDA, etc, and increasing DOD by $60B. Well, the DOD is still gonna get their $60B increase and the losses to other agencies will be marginal at best. Dipshit thought he could just cut away and that won't happen.
I happen to think our Military expenditures are some of the best spent dollars. Can we be more efficient with our outlays?
Absolutely. Do I favor dramatic cuts in programs and weapons systems? Only if they are not working or no longer needed and we have something better.
Fact is we need the US armed forces and we need them as big and strong and bad *** as is physically possible. 2nd to none.
Do we need a Department of Education? Compare its results and what we get out of it to the Armed Services.
Copy that formula for the rest of wasteful Government programs and we could do without a lot of them and never miss em.