HahahahaA federal judge in Phoenix Wednesday formally dismissed the criminal case against former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
What lie? You're OK with this pardon?
Disgusting.A federal judge in Phoenix Wednesday formally dismissed the criminal case against former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Yes it was disgusting when they tried to put the 85 year old man in jail for enforcing the law. The charges were nothing more than a political stunt witchhunt by a far left liberal judge. If Joe had been tried in a jury trial...there would have been no need for a pardon.Disgusting.
Yes it was disgusting when they tried to put the 85 year old man in jail for enforcing the law. The charges were nothing more than a political stunt witchhunt by a far left liberal judge. If Joe had been tried in a jury trial...there would have been no need for a pardon.
lol got it. Presidents pardon criminals all the time, it's not uncommon.Yes it was disgusting when they tried to put the 85 year old man in jail for enforcing the law. The charges were nothing more than a political stunt witchhunt by a far left liberal judge. If Joe had been tried in a jury trial...there would have been no need for a pardon.
They tried to put him in jail for disobeying a federal order for years. Never dreamed you'd put someone above the law. Sad!Yes it was disgusting when they tried to put the 85 year old man in jail for enforcing the law. The charges were nothing more than a political stunt witchhunt by a far left liberal judge. If Joe had been tried in a jury trial...there would have been no need for a pardon.
********.......that order was also made by a far left liberal judge that tried to legislate. Joe was not above the law....he was the law.They tried to put him in jail for disobeying a federal order for years. Never dreamed you'd put someone above the law. Sad!
Did he not have appeal rights? Could he not go through the legal system like every other citizen? Nah, I think we should reward everyone that disobeys federal orders!!! FU laws, lulz********.......that order was also made by a far left liberal judge that tried to legislate. Joe was not above the law....he was the law.
********.......that order was also made by a far left liberal judge that tried to legislate. Joe was not above the law....he was the law.
I am ok with it as the pardon seems to be moot now that the Judge withdrew it.What lie? You're OK with this pardon?
He fed them, clothed them in pink jumpsuits, and housed them in military GP tents. Not sure what the issue is.You need to do some reading up on the guy. He kept jail conditions like POW camps.
Ummm...the judge withdrew the sentencing because of the pardon.I am ok with it as the pardon seems to be moot now that the Judge withdrew it.
Do you wanna go "FULL HILLARY?.....on this...be very careful little one...we've got lots of ammo when it comes to "being above the law and perjury. .. wanna go?Did he not have appeal rights? Could he not go through the legal system like every other citizen? Nah, I think we should reward everyone that disobeys federal orders!!! FU laws, lulz
Would love to....did Hilary receive a pardon I am unaware of?Do you wanna go "FULL HILLARY?.....on this...be very careful little one...we've got lots of ammo when it comes to "being above the law and perjury. .. wanna go?
He fed them, clothed them in pink jumpsuits, and housed them in military GP tents. Not sure what the issue is.
Yep, still fine with the Pardon and good with Joe.Ummm...the judge withdrew the sentencing because of the pardon.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent in formally dismissing the criminal case against the former six-term sheriff of metro Phoenix known for his harsh treatment of inmates and immigration enforcement crackdowns.
She held off on ruling on Arpaio’s request to throw out all orders in the case, including a blistering 14-page ruling in which the judge explained her original reasoning in finding that Arpaio was guilty of a crime.
#draintheswamp
What did I say there that was inaccurate? You might argue that the standards don't meet what you would personally consider acceptable, which is fine. That doesn't make you wrong or right, just a difference of opinion.This is one reason why we can't have honest, civil debates.
Why the need for a federal court system at all?Yep, still fine with the Pardon and good with Joe.
I guess you can electric slide over to the absurd.Why the need for a federal court system at all?
Mark Rich did and he was a wanted criminal. He gave lots of money to the Clinton Foundation. Sounds like a bribe and those clintons are trailer trash and I'm sorry to demean trailer trash.Would love to....did Hilary receive a pardon I am unaware of?
I think absurd is letting a person of authority openly mock orders from a federal court repeatedly and then pardon him before the meanies sent him to prison. That'll learn em!I guess you can electric slide over to the absurd.
He's a fine American. Wish he could throw some of those Antifa hoodlums in some of those tents.Yep, still fine with the Pardon and good with Joe.
Totes agree. In fact I hate all Presidential pardons.Mark Rich did and he was a wanted criminal. He gave lots of money to the Clinton Foundation. Sounds like a bribe and those clintons are trailer trash and I'm sorry to demean trailer trash.
He's a disgusting coward.He's a fine American. Wish he could throw some of those Antifa hoodlums in some of those tents.
I think absurd is letting a person of authority openly mock orders from a federal court repeatedly and then pardon him before the meanies sent him to prison. That'll learn em!
States rights there. Those people were here illegally and the Obama's wanted them here to collect welfare and to vote democratic!I think absurd is letting a person of authority openly mock orders from a federal court repeatedly and then pardon him before the meanies sent him to prison. That'll learn em!
Enforcing the law of the state of Arizona.He's a disgusting coward.
State laws don't supersede the Constitution, commie.Enforcing the law of the state of Arizona.
Ummm...the judge withdrew the sentencing because of the pardon.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent in formally dismissing the criminal case against the former six-term sheriff of metro Phoenix known for his harsh treatment of inmates and immigration enforcement crackdowns.
She held off on ruling on Arpaio’s request to throw out all orders in the case, including a blistering 14-page ruling in which the judge explained her original reasoning in finding that Arpaio was guilty of a crime.
#draintheswamp
Airport? 1 million percent. At least early George Wallace.Guess they would have been OK with George Wallace back in the day......[eyeroll]
Enforcing the law my ***, he was a friggin' Birther who thinks he's above the law, and made a career out of violating about half the amendments to the Constitution. I think his role model must have been Little Bill Daggett.Yes it was disgusting when they tried to put the 85 year old man in jail for enforcing the law. The charges were nothing more than a political stunt witchhunt by a far left liberal judge. If Joe had been tried in a jury trial...there would have been no need for a pardon.
lol. I don't like that part of the legal process.Soooo... we like the legal process or not?
Because the pardon, which we may disagree with, follows that legal process.
When is it against the law to put criminals in jail, antifa lover!State laws don't supersede the Constitution, commie.
Unlike you, probably, I was able to vote at that time. I would never have supported Wallace.Airport? 1 million percent. At least early George Wallace.
When the Federal laws being enforced are being chosen by the Marxist in Chief, I support putting criminals in jail.State laws don't supersede the Constitution, commie.
and that's where the sheriff should be.I support putting criminals in jail.