Our punting game is horrible.
Our punting game is horrible.
Not to mention fumbles that aren't, our non-holds that are, and how to get PI's for balls tgrown 10 feet over the receiver's head out of bounds. We have work to do before we can beat the Hokies.
On a sad note, B12 gonna rip our D to shreds.
A better coach would not have only won that game but done so in dominant fashion. Now we have 4 more years of this mediocrity.
Our punting game is horrible.
If you truly believe that WVU's defense played well last night, then I can't help you, Cuyahoga. WVU's defense was good only when it crowded the line of scrimmage, and Va. Tech was either afraid to call vertical pass plays or attempted to chew time off of the clock. A freshman QB with very raw passing skills was able to expose WVU's weak defense. Something tells me that Fuente would have been elated, if you had told him before the game that his Freshman QB-led offense would put up 235 passing yards, 234 rushing yards, and not commit a single turnover.
Not sure what game you watched but our Offensive line was not getting wrecked. They gave Grier all day to find open receivers. Hard to run when VT loaded the box. Grier was off target early and we had a few drops but no way this was a bad performance by our O Line.Not necessarily trying to defend Dana, but I doubt any coach was going to beat them in dominating fashion with this team. They were bigger, faster, and stronger than we were. Our offensive line was getting absolutely wrecked in the first half.
LOL, Yeah, Ohio State had so much trouble that it won by only 28 points! You had better hope and pray that Oklahoma doesn't get thumped by Ohio State again on Saturday, as the Big 12 will be buried for good, if the Sooners lay another egg vs. the Buckeyes. Back to the subject, as you seem to have hijacked your own thread: Were you napping when Va. Tech's kicker missed two easy FG attempts, which allowed WVU to stay in the Game?WELL, YOU ARE AN OHIO STATE GRAD SO I'LL EXCUSE YOUR IGNORANCE. THE WVU DEFENSE MADE VT FAIL TO CONVERT ON 3RD DOWN EITHER 6 OR 7 STRAIGHT TIMES. THAT IS PLAYING WELL. VT HAD MUCH BETTER FIELD POSITION THAN WVU, THANKS TO THE AWFUL WVU SPECIAL TEAMS, BUT YET BARELY SQUEEZED OUT A VICTORY. THAT'S GOOD DEFENSE BY WVU, WHICH WILL SHRED BIG 12 TEAMS IF THE WVU DEFENSE PLAYS AS STRONGLY AS IT DID AGAINST VT. MY NEARLY 2 DECADES AS A SPORTSWRITER TELLS ME THAT THIS REBUILT DEFENSE (1 STARTER BACK ON THE FRONT LINE) WILL ONLY GET BETTER AS THE SEASON PROGRESSES UNDER TONY GIBSON'S COACHING. YOU CAN GO BACK TO WONDERING WHY OHIO STATE HAD SO MUCH TROUBLE AGAINST A MIDDLING INDIANA TEAM.
You're correct, especially with respect to the First Half when Grier had all day and night to survey the field, and find the open receiver.Not sure what game you watched but our Offensive line was not getting wrecked. They gave Grier all day to find open receivers. Hard to run when VT loaded the box. Grier was off target early and we had a few drops but no way this was a bad performance by our O Line.
You're correct, especially with respect to the First Half when Grier had all day and night to survey the field, and find the open receiver.
Yards don't win games. Points win games. Red font and capital letters don't change these facts. The End.
They were bigger, faster, and stronger than we were
It is much more than the punting game.
For some last nights game is a bit of a shock. This was not supposed to happen; WVU was finally around the corner and everything was looking up. Except it isn't. Tech won the game but by the end of this season we will discover that they really aren't anything special and will likely have another typical year for them, but they looked and performed well last night and that is what counts in each game.
For the rest of us, this is an affirmation and not a criticism. Dana has not been growing; he grew to his level of ability in the 2014 season. I will say he is not a bad coach and will likely be successful in a smaller limelight, but he is not a coach for this level of play and I do not think he ever will be. So long as WVU retains his services, last night is the sort of 'product' we should expect. A better coach would not have only won that game but done so in dominant fashion. Now we have 4 more years of this mediocrity.
If you truly believe that WVU's defense played well last night, then I can't help you, Cuyahoga. WVU's defense was good only when it crowded the line of scrimmage, and Va. Tech was either afraid to call vertical pass plays or attempted to chew time off of the clock. A freshman QB with very raw passing skills was able to expose WVU's weak defense. Something tells me that Fuente would have been elated, if you had told him before the game that his Freshman QB-led offense would put up 235 passing yards, 234 rushing yards, and not commit a single turnover.
WVU OFFENSE HAD THE MOST YARDS AGAINST A BUD FOSTER DEFENSE IN 10 YEARS! THAT IS NOT A LIABILITY BUT AN INCREDIBLE ACHIEVEMENT. I WILL REPEAT: WVU OFFENSE WON THE GAME. WVU DEFENSE WON THE GAME. WVU SPECIAL TEAMS LOST THE GAME. HANDS DOWN.
M angy special teams caused loss to Virginia Tech, 31-24
O bliterate East Carolina
U nhinge Delaware State
N apalm Kansas
T errorize TCU
A nnihilate Texas Tech
I ncinerate Baylor
N ullify Oklahoma State
E masculate Iowa State
E rectile dysfunction Kansas State
R eam Texas
S avage Oklahoma
Speaking of morons, what the he!! does "an OSU" mean? There would be no point in posting about a WVU/Va. Tech game on an Ohio State message board because, unlike me, very few Ohio State fans live in West Virginia, let alone care at all about WVU athletics. Somebody has a butthurt rash today, doesn't she?Now why are you here? I realize that an OSU is boring as hell, but shouldn't you be expressing your moronic opinions on your own board?
Speaking of morons, what the he!! does "an OSU" mean? There would be no point in posting about a WVU/Va. Tech game on an Ohio State message board because, unlike me, very few Ohio State fans live in West Virginia, let alone care at all about WVU athletics. Somebody has a butthurt rash today, doesn't she?