Heat getting a little hotter

[countryroads89_rivals]

http://www.npr.org/2017/05/22/52958...ign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20170522

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

http://www.npr.org/2017/05/22/52958...ign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20170522

Article posted sourcing another article who sourced anonymous sources. Seems legit.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Article posted sourcing another article who sourced anonymous sources. Seems legit.

You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?

 

[TarHeelEer]

You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?

And yet I don't hear the words conviction not Trump in what you post.

Wake me up when it gets entertaining.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?

Of course I will.

 

[moe]

http://www.npr.org/2017/05/22/52958...ign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20170522

Will he ask Mueller next? I think that Trump has asked nearly everyone that he can think of to stop or impede the Trump/Russian/election collusion investigation. At least he's thorough. He didn't want to offend anyone by not asking them.

 

[rog1187]

You're going to be sorely disappointed when Comey testifies and other grand juries convene. Will you have the balls to say those anonymous sources were correct?

I'd say let me know when the anonymous sources get actual names attached to them.

 

[Brushy Bill]

I'm of the opinion that when this is all said and done everyone that thought there was "Russian collusion" should be sent to Russia to face justice for trying to start WW3 by being liars.

 

[moe]

I'm of the opinion that when this is all said and done everyone that thought there was "Russian collusion" should be sent to Russia to face justice for trying to start WW3 by being liars.

Would that be before or after Trump's impeachment proceedings?

 

[Brushy Bill]

Would that be before or after Trump's impeachment proceedings?

During

 

[bornaneer]

http://www.npr.org/2017/05/22/52958...ign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20170522

Nothing illegal was done. Since when is it illegal to ask someone to say there was no collusion when it was widely reported there was zero evidence there was? I missed the part where Trump ordered anyone to do any crime. Lots of clouds but no rain. Just keep framing the news a certain way and a lot of the low IQ crowd eats it up.

 

[mule_eer]

This is where it gets rich. The leaks that exposed those agents are from Obama? If not, we have to find fault with every president in the last 70 years at least, because all of them had agents lose their lives or their freedom to a hostile country.

This also shows the bias of the tweet. Of course Obama gets no credit for the operation that finally took down OBL, but he's entirely responsible for whatever leak, whether it was someone who gave them up or through a hack, that led to the death or imprisonment of several agents in China.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]