Comey stated that the RNC was hacked as well (although old emails) and these emails ere never released. Evidence that Trump was never colluding with their efforts? Evidence of possible blackmail? Evidence of an attempt to help Trump during primaries? More ******** no one should be worried about?
GOP hacked as well?
- Thread starter Boomboom521
- Start date
I can't wait to hear the explaination of the recent revelations of the Russian hacking scandal now. No big deal right....so what if our President might be compromised by a foreign government, right? Just more liberal bs.
Last edited:
I would love to read it. If there is as much corruption there as in the DNC, I'm more than prepared to be as equally outraged. I'm more concerned with ensuring we have our own house (both parties) in order before focusing outwardly.
Moreover, do you really not go into the assumption China, Russia, North Korea, Israel, Great Britian, etc. are not spying on us? Really? Do you not think we are doing the same?
You'd have to be seriously dim to think corruption in Washington is one sided (Democrats). No one is that dumb.
I don't think it's one-sided. If evidence exists from the RNC, bring it into the light. Shine a giant spot light on all of the corruption, backroom dealing, payoffs, illegal activity, etc. That's what I want to happen. It doesn't frighten me. Get it all out there and then let us usher easily in Term Limits. I'm not the one in denial to the reality of my party.
Comey stated to congress that the Russians tried to get compromising information on Trump.
Shocking. So did Hillary. I guess that means hillary was working with the russians?
I know exactly what I am asking. When your ilk determined that the Russians and Trump both wanted Hillary to lose the obvious logic that you guys chose was that Trump must be working with the Russians. I am applying that same ignorant logic to Hillary since apparently they both wanted to dig up dirt on Trump.
I'm not focused on the buzzfeed leak. I'm looking at Trumps actions, the intelligence community's findings (that have been made public so far), and asking questions.
The intelligence community is stating that the Russians provided the Podesta emails to Wikileaks through a third party. The intelligence community is stating that this was a part of a strategy to hurt Clinton during the campaign (it does appear to be accurate). Now the intelligence community is stating that the Russian government was attempting to find compromising information onTrump himself. All the while, Trump appears unconcerned and vehemently denies that the Russians were involved. He is appointing pro-Russian figures to his cabinet. He is discrediting the media.
It doesn't really make much sense to me. Why deny Russia's involvement? Why not just wait and see? Why wouldn't you as President-elect, take the actions of a foreign government trying to acquire compromising information on you as hostile?
I agree with tarheeleer. Everything you assumed is not backed up by actual facts.
Let me know when the intel community actually provides those facts instead of just asking me to assume what they are saying means what you want it to mean.