Toggle sidebar

After 7 bowl games ....

Reply
C

Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals

Freshman
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
FIVE bowl teams have losing records.
What is this, a participation trophy bowl season?
Sure diminishes the quality of being a bowl game. Or at least makes the few who don't go to a bowl feel like super losers.



M anhandled Missouri, 26-11

O rdinary against Youngstown, 38-21

U nnerving miracle goalline tip/interception escapes BYU, 35-32

N o quit against Kansas State, 17-16

T ony’s turbulence tore up Texas Tech, 48-17

A nother defense whipping, of TCU, 34-10

I gnominy of turnovers against Oklahoma State, 20-37

N o problem decimating Kansas, 48-21

E xcellent, timely defense AGAIN; beat Texas, 24-20

E rectile dysfunctioned against Oklahoma, 56-28

R ebounded big time on offense and defense at Iowa State, 49-19

S aved again by the defense against Baylor, 24-21


Now, let’s blow through Miami like a hurricane!
 
G

GoWVU

Sophomore
Nov 17, 2001
24,049
125
0
Kind of a bookkeeping-type thing, but that's why I was opposed to the 12-game schedule when it passed. With an odd number of games, you had to be at least 6-5 to get a bowl as I'm sure everybody recalls. Once they added the 12th game, and the NCAA told everybody that playing an FCS rent-a-victim every year was OK is exactly when the bowl system went into overkill mode.
 
G

GetYaNumbersUp

Redshirt
Mar 15, 2013
15,118
39
0
Are those losing records after the bowl game? I suspect most of them are 6-6 teams and not 5-7.

Either way, it's more football to watch and reward to the players who bust their asses year round on the field, weight room, etc.

I see no issue with it.
 
C

Cuyahoga Falls Eers_rivals

Freshman
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
Perfect solution:

8 bowls.

16 teams.



and then the next week



4 bowls

for the 8 winners



and then the next week



2 bowls

for 4 winners



and then the next week

1 bowl for the 2 winners

for national title



All you need is 15 bowl sites so that you don't play at the same place twice. If you aren't in the top 16, you shouldn't be playing in a bowl anyway.



Teams that are 6-7 after losing in a bowl just doesn't make sense.



Other divisions do it. Why not D-1?



Eventually it would draw as much interest and TV eyeballs as March Madness.

And we can avoid this College Football Pretzel committee crap.
 
K

KeatonsCorner

Senior
Nov 5, 2012
55,421
679
113
Any bowl outside of the Playoffs is a participation trophy

They are meant to make money, and they do

So why not have as many as can find proper sponsorship?

Makes zero sense for this false elitist outlook for any fan base not in the playoffs
 
P

Papillion

Freshman
May 29, 2001
12,518
79
0
KeatonsCorner said:
Any bowl outside of the Playoffs is a participation trophy

They are meant to make money, and they do

So why not have as many as can find proper sponsorship?

Makes zero sense for this false elitist outlook for any fan base not in the playoffs
Click to expand...

Yeah, and who do they make money for? Not the schools. These schools are losing money at these bowl games at an alarming rate and no one seems to care but gripe about rising cost of education. Athletics is contributing to that rise in cost.
 
S

skygusty_rivals

Freshman
May 14, 2003
4,990
65
0
GoWVU said:
Kind of a bookkeeping-type thing, but that's why I was opposed to the 12-game schedule when it passed. With an odd number of games, you had to be at least 6-5 to get a bowl as I'm sure everybody recalls. Once they added the 12th game, and the NCAA told everybody that playing an FCS rent-a-victim every year was OK is exactly when the bowl system went into overkill mode.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Yet so many people say we can't have 8 teams in the playoff, too many games. But we can make EVERYBODY play 12 games instead of having TWO teams play one more game. Go back to 11 games, kill the megaconferences, have an 8 team playoff and college football would be a lot better.
 
G

GetYaNumbersUp

Redshirt
Mar 15, 2013
15,118
39
0
Papillion said:
Yeah, and who do they make money for? Not the schools. These schools are losing money at these bowl games at an alarming rate and no one seems to care but gripe about rising cost of education. Athletics is contributing to that rise in cost.
Click to expand...

If that's the case, the schools certainly have the opportunity to decline the bowl bid.

No one is forcing Central Michigan to play in a bowl that will sell 500 tickets.
 
T

TexasforevEER

Freshman
Nov 10, 2006
2,364
64
0
The bowl games to date have been .......................boring. The only game that peaks my interest is WV and Miami. Yes................I have pretty much given up made for TV sports unless the Mountaineers are playing. Warez
 
B

Butler-eer

Redshirt
Aug 26, 2002
1,274
2
38
Cuyahoga Falls Eers said:
FIVE bowl teams have losing records.
What is this, a participation trophy bowl season?
Sure diminishes the quality of being a bowl game. Or at least makes the few who don't go to a bowl feel like super losers.



M anhandled Missouri, 26-11

O rdinary against Youngstown, 38-21

U nnerving miracle goalline tip/interception escapes BYU, 35-32

N o quit against Kansas State, 17-16

T ony’s turbulence tore up Texas Tech, 48-17

A nother defense whipping, of TCU, 34-10

I gnominy of turnovers against Oklahoma State, 20-37

N o problem decimating Kansas, 48-21

E xcellent, timely defense AGAIN; beat Texas, 24-20

E rectile dysfunctioned against Oklahoma, 56-28

R ebounded big time on offense and defense at Iowa State, 49-19

S aved again by the defense against Baylor, 24-21


Now, let’s blow through Miami like a hurricane!
Click to expand...
 
B

Butler-eer

Redshirt
Aug 26, 2002
1,274
2
38
CFE.... only 2 teams with 5-6 records BEFORE the bowl game. EVERY FBS team with 6 W's got a bowl. Needed 2 more teams to fill out the bowl schedule.
 
WVex-pat in GA

WVex-pat in GA

Senior
Dec 17, 2007
14,949
949
113
As of today, 12/28 and before any games played today, 20 bowl games have been played; 40 teams. 29 of those teams came out of the games with winning records; 11 teams did not have winning records after the bowl game. There are 4 more teams competing in bowls who could possibly not have a winning record after their bowl game. 15 teams without winning records after completion of bowl games is way too many.
 
Top Bottom
Reply