A question for the board

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
First, let's assume that the DNC and Podesta were hacked. What does this mean when the FBI claims that Hillary's private server was hacked 5 times by foreign actors.

She had national security information on her server. She had Clinton Foundation information on that server. The subject of potential blackmail of her by these foreign agents was very, very high.

Yet, not a word from the libs on this during the campaign. It was all about nothing. A witch hunt. No harm done.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
First, let's assume that the DNC and Podesta were hacked. What does this mean when the FBI claims that Hillary's private server was hacked 5 times by foreign actors.

She had national security information on her server. She had Clinton Foundation information on that server. The subject of potential blackmail of her by these foreign agents was very, very high.

Yet, not a word from the libs on this during the campaign. It was all about nothing. A witch hunt. No harm done.
This is where youand others remain stupid. If the servers are hacked, that is one issue. As it pertains to Hillary, she made the decision and has admitted her stupidity. She paid a political price for it. But she broke no laws over it. Done. She has also been investigated for other things suxh as your allegations. She broke no laws. It is done. But nuts like you keep the conspiracies going. Get over it.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
This is where youand others remain stupid. If the servers are hacked, that is one issue. As it pertains to Hillary, she made the decision and has admitted her stupidity. She paid a political price for it. But she broke no laws over it. Done. She has also been investigated for other things suxh as your allegations. She broke no laws. It is done. But nuts like you keep the conspiracies going. Get over it.

I disagree on the law as do many, many federal prosecutors. Comey decided not to ask DOJ to indict (maybe the Clinton/Lynch meeting had an impact, lol). But the possibility of black mail is very, very real which you didn't address.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,115
2,178
113
Russia hacked the email ...we need to fix that problem plain & simple!
Now let's break down what was in the emails & if they was tampered with !
We as a country needs to get over political parties, they both are sliding the meat in us .
Stop comparing who had the biggest deficit & start telling D.C 1.00$ is to much
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
You are a habitual liar. You watch so much ********, you don't know what is truth and what is not.

The FBI never concluded Hillary's e-mail server was hacked by foreign entities.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...26de2537a9d_story.html?utm_term=.6e2211e10465

You simply don't read very much:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...n-intel-agencies-breached-clinton-server.html

http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/11/727...oreign-govts-and-risked-us-national-security/

99% seems pretty high to me. And Comey admitted in testimony that her server was less secure than gmail. LOL.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You simply don't read very much:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...n-intel-agencies-breached-clinton-server.html

http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/11/727...oreign-govts-and-risked-us-national-security/

99% seems pretty high to me. And Comey admitted in testimony that her server was less secure than gmail. LOL.

"High chance" - perfect example of Fox telling their viewers what they want their viewers to believe....and their idiot viewers lapping it up.

You can't find a quote where Comey said "her server was hacked" let alone by "five foreign intelligence agencies".

Use some critical thinking. Don't be a rube.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
"High chance" - perfect example of Fox telling their viewers what they want their viewers to believe....and their idiot viewers lapping it up.

You can't find a quote where Comey said "her server was hacked" let alone by "five foreign intelligence agencies".

Use some critical thinking. Don't be a rube.

You're an absolute fool if you don't believe her home brewed server, less secure than gmail wasn't hacked. FBI sources put the likelihood at 99%. That tells us all we need to know about your blindness to everything liberal. I called for an investigation of the Russians potential hacking. Yet, you can't admit that Hillary left herself wide open for black mail.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You're an absolute fool if you don't believe her home brewed server, less secure than gmail wasn't hacked. FBI sources put the likelihood at 99%. That tells us all we need to know about your blindness to everything liberal. I called for an investigation of the Russians potential hacking. Yet, you can't admit that Hillary left herself wide open for black mail.

Here is a quote of Comey's statement:
"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Can you show me anywhere, I repeat, anywhere, he said there was a 99% likelihood that she was hacked?

This is about you constantly f'ucking up the facts and believing whatever you want to believe rather than having an open mind and being objective.

This is quoted from your OP in this thread: "What does this mean when the FBI claims that Hillary's private server was hacked 5 times by foreign actors."

Now can you see all the BS you constantly fall for and repeat as fact?
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Here is a quote of Comey's statement:
"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Can you show me anywhere, I repeat, anywhere, he said there was a 99% likelihood that she was hacked?

This is about you constantly f'ucking up the facts and believing whatever you want to believe rather than having an open mind and being objective.

This is quoted from your OP in this thread: "What does this mean when the FBI claims that Hillary's private server was hacked 5 times by foreign actors."

Now can you see all the BS you constantly fall for and repeat as fact?

I gave you direct information from the FBI after Comey's testimony that there was a 99% likelihood of her being hacked. Directly from the FBI.

Comey did say this:

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,208
5,699
113
she made the decision and has admitted her stupidity. She paid a political price for it. But she broke no laws over it.

The server itself was illegal. Espionage act, and she violated her security clearance.