Now libs are banning books

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
285
83
Where in the article does it say that Liberals has a book banned?
True. This is same topic different thread from the other day but the other thread linked a different article. If I recall correctly the other article stated that the book(s) had been taken out of the school library while the issue was reviewed by school officials. Nothing had been banned. Also of course, the OP seems to know the politics of all the people involved and then attributes that stance to millions (liberals) of other people in his typical mindless manner. Those folks were just following school policy which was established by who knows but obviously they were liberals lol. The weak troll attempts by the OP never end.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
True. This is same topic different thread from the other day but the other thread linked a different article. If I recall correctly the other article stated that the book(s) had been taken out of the school library while the issue was reviewed by school officials. Nothing had been banned. Also of course, the OP seems to know the politics of all the people involved and then attributes that stance to millions (liberals) of other people in his typical mindless manner. Those folks were just following school policy which was established by who knows but obviously they were liberals lol. The weak troll attempts by the OP never end.

If you don't know that political correctness (which this represents) is not a product of the left (Trump ran against PC), then I can't help you. But to deny this is either disingenuous on your part or your simply ignoring reality.

Also, what term would you use when books are removed purposely from a library. Banning seems pretty accurate a term to me.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
285
83
If you don't know that political correctness (which this represents) is not a product of the left (Trump ran against PC), then I can't help you. But to deny this is either disingenuous on your part or your simply ignoring reality.

Also, what term would you use when books are removed purposely from a library. Banning seems pretty accurate a term to me.
The fact is that you have zero idea what these folks politics are so you're dead in the water there. You have no idea who (or their politics) established the book review policy at that school or when. The books in question have been temporarily taken out of circulation until a decision has been made as to the ultimate disposition of said books. Maybe they will be banned, who knows but I seriously doubt it. If you don't know what a book ban is then look it up. Perhaps you could lighten up on the right wing blogs so you wouldn't look like such a fool for bringing this trivial garbage here.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
The fact is that you have zero idea what these folks politics are so you're dead in the water there. You have no idea who (or their politics) established the book review policy at that school or when. The books in question have been temporarily taken out of circulation until a decision has been made as to the ultimate disposition of said books. Maybe they will be banned, who knows but I seriously doubt it. If you don't know what a book ban is then look it up. Perhaps you could lighten up on the right wing blogs so you wouldn't look like such a fool for bringing this trivial garbage here.

I can make a highly educated guess. Educators are overwhelmingly liberal. Teachers unions are overwhelmingly liberal. Political correctness is ONLY liberal. So I am comfortable in assuming liberals decided to remove these books.

No where in the article that I posted does it say "temporary." If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it.


Virginia schools ban ‘To Kill a Mockingbird,’ ‘Huckleberry Finn’ for racial slurs

The decision to remove “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain and “To Kill A Mockingbird” by Harper Lee came after a parent filed a complaint, WAVY reported. The parent cited excessive racial slurs as the reason for wanting the books banned, Superintendent Warren Holland told the news station.

The parent, whose son is biracial, said that her concerns are “not even just a black and white thing.”

“I keep hearing, ‘This is a classic, This is a classic,’ … I understand this is a literature classic. But at some point, I feel that children will not — or do not — truly get the classic part — the literature part, which I’m not disputing,” she said at a Nov. 15 school board meeting. “This is great literature. But there (are so many) racial slurs in there and offensive wording that you can’t get past that.”

The parent said her son, who was reading “Huckleberry Finn” for a high school assignment, couldn’t get past a certain page in that story on which the N-word appeared seven times.

A racial slur appears 219 times in “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and 48 times in “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

“So what are we teaching our children? We’re validating that these words are acceptable, and they are not acceptable by (any) means,” the parent said, also noting psychological effects language has on children. “There is other literature they can use.”

Both books mock bigotry. Yet, this superintendent apparently succumbed to stupidity.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I can make a highly educated guess. Educators are overwhelmingly liberal. Teachers unions are overwhelmingly liberal. Political correctness is ONLY liberal. So I am comfortable in assuming liberals decided to remove these books.

No where in the article that I posted does it say "temporary." If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it.


Virginia schools ban ‘To Kill a Mockingbird,’ ‘Huckleberry Finn’ for racial slurs

The decision to remove “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain and “To Kill A Mockingbird” by Harper Lee came after a parent filed a complaint, WAVY reported. The parent cited excessive racial slurs as the reason for wanting the books banned, Superintendent Warren Holland told the news station.

The parent, whose son is biracial, said that her concerns are “not even just a black and white thing.”

“I keep hearing, ‘This is a classic, This is a classic,’ … I understand this is a literature classic. But at some point, I feel that children will not — or do not — truly get the classic part — the literature part, which I’m not disputing,” she said at a Nov. 15 school board meeting. “This is great literature. But there (are so many) racial slurs in there and offensive wording that you can’t get past that.”

The parent said her son, who was reading “Huckleberry Finn” for a high school assignment, couldn’t get past a certain page in that story on which the N-word appeared seven times.

A racial slur appears 219 times in “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and 48 times in “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

“So what are we teaching our children? We’re validating that these words are acceptable, and they are not acceptable by (any) means,” the parent said, also noting psychological effects language has on children. “There is other literature they can use.”

Both books mock bigotry. Yet, this superintendent apparently succumbed to stupidity.
Good points about the books, the narrative actually combats racism
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Please let's stop pushing Americans to one side or the other.

We are a divided nation and have been so for some time, although never this bad, imo. I believe the Dems have lead the way in dividing this country into special interest groups (blacks, hispanics, asians, millennials, single women) and had some success. It has come back to bite them.

We are all Americans. We have to stop with the identity by race. John Wayne once said that he opposed hyphenating nationalities (e.g. African-American). He observed that hyphen only serves to divide, not unite). A lot of truth in that, imo.
 
Last edited:

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,261
3,339
113
The fact is that you have zero idea what these folks politics are so you're dead in the water there. You have no idea who (or their politics) established the book review policy at that school or when. The books in question have been temporarily taken out of circulation until a decision has been made as to the ultimate disposition of said books. Maybe they will be banned, who knows but I seriously doubt it. If you don't know what a book ban is then look it up. Perhaps you could lighten up on the right wing blogs so you wouldn't look like such a fool for bringing this trivial garbage here.
Reviewing the books to see if they will be banned because the N word is used X times........Yep, sounds like the GOP to me. SMH

You guys are like a pack of bottle rockets that got lit all at once, you all are going every which way. Not sure you all know whether to scratch your watch or wind your *** after the results of the election. **** has traumatized you all into stupidity at this point.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Wasn't so civil......ahhhhbazinga amiright? Amiright?
That last line of that Guns N Roses song slays me every time.


Just so super serious in his delivery.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
We are a divided nation and have been so for some time, although never this bad, imo. I believe the Dems have lead the way in dividing this country into special interest groups (blacks, hispanics, asians, millennials, single women) and had some success. It has come back to bite them.

We are all Americans. We have to stop with the identity by race. John Wayne once said that he opposed hyphenating nationalities (e.g. African American). He observed that hyphen only serves to divide, not unite). A lot of truth in that, imo.
A lot of the groups you mentioned have a steeper hill than you to climb everyday. Don't get me wrong, it's hard for all of us, but racism and sexism do still exist (NO NOT JUST FROM TRUMP SUPPORTERS), but there are still forces at work preventing some groups from achieving a level playing field. It's better than it was in the past, but what's wrong with helping to aid groups that were held back for decades?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
285
83
I can make a highly educated guess. Educators are overwhelmingly liberal. Teachers unions are overwhelmingly liberal. Political correctness is ONLY liberal. So I am comfortable in assuming liberals decided to remove these books.

No where in the article that I posted does it say "temporary." If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it.


Virginia schools ban ‘To Kill a Mockingbird,’ ‘Huckleberry Finn’ for racial slurs

The decision to remove “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain and “To Kill A Mockingbird” by Harper Lee came after a parent filed a complaint, WAVY reported. The parent cited excessive racial slurs as the reason for wanting the books banned, Superintendent Warren Holland told the news station.

The parent, whose son is biracial, said that her concerns are “not even just a black and white thing.”

“I keep hearing, ‘This is a classic, This is a classic,’ … I understand this is a literature classic. But at some point, I feel that children will not — or do not — truly get the classic part — the literature part, which I’m not disputing,” she said at a Nov. 15 school board meeting. “This is great literature. But there (are so many) racial slurs in there and offensive wording that you can’t get past that.”

The parent said her son, who was reading “Huckleberry Finn” for a high school assignment, couldn’t get past a certain page in that story on which the N-word appeared seven times.

A racial slur appears 219 times in “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and 48 times in “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

“So what are we teaching our children? We’re validating that these words are acceptable, and they are not acceptable by (any) means,” the parent said, also noting psychological effects language has on children. “There is other literature they can use.”

Both books mock bigotry. Yet, this superintendent apparently succumbed to stupidity.

Yet, this superintendent apparently succumbed to school policy (FIFY) smh In the absence of facts, just keep on making up your own reality about the politics of the folks who established the school policy in question. No one is interested in your low educated guessing especially from someone who is rarely correct on anything.
ACCOMAC, Va. (WAVY) — Two classic American novels have been temporarily pulled from book shelves in Accomack County Public Schools.
Per the school’s policy, the request will now go before a committee made up of a principal, librarian, teacher, parent and potentially others. The committee will then make a recommendation to the superintendent.

http://wavy.com/2016/11/30/classic-novels-pulled-from-accomack-county-public-schools/
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Would this be a generalizing statement? Would this be lumping an entire group of people together over one incident?
I make generalizing statements. Some things are generally true. I didn't complain about generalizations. I think that was your hero.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
The superintendent who banned the books is a democrat and a contributor to the democratic party.
Not saying he isn't....but when did all democrats become liberals and all republicans conservatives? Is it not possible to be conservative on economic issues yet liberal on social issues? Or independent (like I am) who is liberal on social issues, but believes a candidate can be effective for all Americans no matter there party affiliation?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,261
3,339
113
A lot of the groups you mentioned have a steeper hill than you to climb everyday. Don't get me wrong, it's hard for all of us, but racism and sexism do still exist (NO NOT JUST FROM TRUMP SUPPORTERS), but there are still forces at work preventing some groups from achieving a level playing field. It's better than it was in the past, but what's wrong with helping to aid groups that were held back for decades?
How do you know he isn't one of those?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,261
3,339
113
Not saying he isn't....but when did all democrats become liberals and all republicans conservatives? Is it not possible to be conservative on economic issues yet liberal on social issues? Or independent (like I am) who is liberal on social issues, but believes a candidate can be effective for all Americans no matter there party affiliation?
Pretty much the last 15 years when the left played identity politics and forced everyone into little boxes.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I make generalizing statements. Some things are generally true. I didn't complain about generalizations. I think that was your hero.
You did to me....you told me that it was wrong to generalize all trump supporters as racist and homophobic. Which I agree with btw.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
A lot of the groups you mentioned have a steeper hill than you to climb everyday. Don't get me wrong, it's hard for all of us, but racism and sexism do still exist (NO NOT JUST FROM TRUMP SUPPORTERS), but there are still forces at work preventing some groups from achieving a level playing field. It's better than it was in the past, but what's wrong with helping to aid groups that were held back for decades?

Go tell the white guy in Beckley that just lost his mining job that he is privileged. Of course, we want a level playing field for everyone. Equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. But constantly talking about white privilege is divisive to many Americans.

Stop dividing Americans into racial groups and try to win their votes by narrowly promising them stuff that adversely affects others. Promote equal opportunity for all. Good education. Available jobs. Upward mobility. Hope. That brings us together. Don't take sides. Don't promote BLM at the expense of Cops, for example.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,261
3,339
113
I'm not saying the left isn't guilty of identity politics, but there was none coming from the right?
Not really, we didn't really play into the race/sex angle to govern as a strategy like the left. Pretty much just lump the whole of the left into one bucket titled "liberal pussies" who don't understand economics.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Not really, we didn't really play into the race/sex angle to govern as a strategy like the left. Pretty much just lump the whole of the left into one bucket titled "liberal pussies" who don't understand economics.
Or Republican cucks
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Not saying he isn't....but when did all democrats become liberals and all republicans conservatives? Is it not possible to be conservative on economic issues yet liberal on social issues? Or independent (like I am) who is liberal on social issues, but believes a candidate can be effective for all Americans no matter there party affiliation?
Educated guess.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,261
3,339
113
Or Republican cucks
I think you and I were one of those according to Milo since we were both against him and neither of us voted for him. I just couldn't debase myself and vote for her like you did. I can still look myself in the mirror and not feel icky.