be apart of HRC's WH staff?
Absolutely. Get as many sycophants in there as possible. Just curious when CNN/MSNBC merge and are going to rename themselves Pravda since all they are is essentially a liberal cheering section.be apart of HRC's WH staff?
I think you are being unfair to CNN. I tend to think of them as middle-of-the-road. I'll admit that I don't watch much of any news station in my free time. I tend to prefer to read my news or catch it on the radio while driving. When I do watch, I tend to favor CNN. I think they usually present both sides. Most of the recent stuff I've watched on there is post-debate coverage, and they have some talking heads on that panel - from both sides. I find those folks annoying, and I wish they would get rid of them. They dominate the air time, and they add nothing. Regardless of what happens in the debate, whichever candidate they prefer won no matter what occurred in the debate. The guy they have on that panel that I do like a lot is Michael Smerconish. He's pretty balanced and fair. He also doesn't get much air time because he's not likely to shout over folks.Absolutely. Get as many sycophants in there as possible. Just curious when CNN/MSNBC merge and are going to rename themselves Pravda since all they are is essentially a liberal cheering section.
Fox News challenges liberal BS and paints Dems as evil and unpatriotic. MSNBC challenges conservative BS and paints conservatives as ignorant Neanderthals. CNN challenges both sides. The fact that you think CNN is a "liberal cheering section" shows what a ignorant Neanderthal you are.Absolutely. Get as many sycophants in there as possible. Just curious when CNN/MSNBC merge and are going to rename themselves Pravda since all they are is essentially a liberal cheering section.
I don't know if he will be part of the WH staff but since he has always been the head puppeteer he will continue to pull the strings.be apart of HRC's WH staff?
Mule, he said CNN. I don't know what segments you have watched, but there is normally not an ounce of balance coming from the house. They may have a conservative guest that they are nice enough ask and answer the questions and thank him for coming.I think you are being unfair to CNN. I tend to think of them as middle-of-the-road. I'll admit that I don't watch much of any news station in my free time. I tend to prefer to read my news or catch it on the radio while driving. When I do watch, I tend to favor CNN. I think they usually present both sides. Most of the recent stuff I've watched on there is post-debate coverage, and they have some talking heads on that panel - from both sides. I find those folks annoying, and I wish they would get rid of them. They dominate the air time, and they add nothing. Regardless of what happens in the debate, whichever candidate they prefer won no matter what occurred in the debate. The guy they have on that panel that I do like a lot is Michael Smerconish. He's pretty balanced and fair. He also doesn't get much air time because he's not likely to shout over folks.
Then you wouldn't mind those that challenge both sides. When are they on? Admit I never see CNN on Saturday, but the other six days I can watch 5minute increments (lied about PM when Chris would be easiest to give 5)Fox News challenges liberal BS and paints Dems as evil and unpatriotic. MSNBC challenges conservative BS and paints conservatives as ignorant Neanderthals. CNN challenges both sides. The fact that you think CNN is a "liberal cheering section" shows what a ignorant Neanderthal you are.
The fact you think I was defending FoxNews tells me how programmed you are. In fact, I wasn't, not at all actually. I didn't include them as they aren't likely to jump on board the Clinton talking points and parrot them when she is elected. If Trump were projecting to win, I'd have a different conversation. See, I can actually acknowledge when the party I'm apart of dicks the dog with who they've voted to represent them. Moreover, I'm inclined to not support that action through my vote. I can see though that you don't share that same level of personal integrity.Fox News challenges liberal BS and paints Dems as evil and unpatriotic. MSNBC challenges conservative BS and paints conservatives as ignorant Neanderthals. CNN challenges both sides. The fact that you think CNN is a "liberal cheering section" shows what a ignorant Neanderthal you are.
I think you are wrong. Exhibit 1: You are defending them.Fox News challenges liberal BS and paints Dems as evil and unpatriotic. MSNBC challenges conservative BS and paints conservatives as ignorant Neanderthals. CNN challenges both sides. The fact that you think CNN is a "liberal cheering section" shows what a ignorant Neanderthal you are.
CNN is about as biased as news media can get.