Pence is kicking Kaines ***........

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
686
0
holy cow... kaine is a buffoon...

and he doesn't know when to shut his hole...

damn he's stupid...
 
Last edited:

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
686
0
I can understand Hilliary picking Kaine....

She'd never be the stupidest person in the room.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
686
0
 

op2

All-Conference
Mar 16, 2014
11,644
1,237
103
To paraphrase a trumpism, Kaine could shoot someone and the Democrats still wouldn't lose. It's over and it has been for a long time. The Democrats nominated a weak candidate but they're going to win because the Republicans nominated a historically bad candidate. This will make 6 out of 7 elections in which the Republicans not only lost the popular vote but also got less than 48% of the vote.

We're in the midst of a historic transition. The Republicans will be back on top eventually for sure but it will be a completely different party than 25 years ago when this all started, especially with regards to social issues.
 

Popeer

Freshman
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
And? It's not like it all went into their bank account, unlike Trump University, the Trump Foundation, donations to the Trump Campaign ...
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,166
3,213
113
And? It's not like it all went into their bank account, unlike Trump University, the Trump Foundation, donations to the Trump Campaign ...
So? Can we please stop with this? It's not ok in either instance.
 

Popeer

Freshman
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
So? Can we please stop with this? It's not ok in either instance.
Why not? Do you understand the function of the Clinton Foundation? Or, like the Wall Street Journal and others, are you conflating it with the Clinton Family Foundation?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,166
3,213
113
Why not? Do you understand the function of the Clinton Foundation? Or, like the Wall Street Journal and others, are you conflating it with the Clinton Family Foundation?
I'm not conflating anything. You are rationalizing.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
If you find someone saying "no he didn't" over and over as direct contradictions to the truth, yes Pence won the night but will lose the week which is Jake Tappers entire quote. But those denials will come back to haunt him as the Dems now have video and sound of even more boldface lies from the entire GOP team.

But regardless, that 90 minutes last night didn't influence many voters one way or the other. For interested individuals, it was worth watching. For most of America, they will have no clue about the event.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
To paraphrase a trumpism, Kaine could shoot someone and the Democrats still wouldn't lose. It's over and it has been for a long time. The Democrats nominated a weak candidate but they're going to win because the Republicans nominated a historically bad candidate. This will make 6 out of 7 elections in which the Republicans not only lost the popular vote but also got less than 48% of the vote.

We're in the midst of a historic transition. The Republicans will be back on top eventually for sure but it will be a completely different party than 25 years ago when this all started, especially with regards to social issues.
Yes, in your Republican party Joe Manchin will replace Reince Priebus and Maxine Waters and Jesse Jackson will be integral leadership. Trump is getting a bump because those Rinos occupying offices in DC.
 

Popeer

Freshman
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
Trump is getting a bump because those Rinos occupying offices in DC.
You people crack me up with your RINO nonsense. The patron saint of the GOP, Ronald Reagan, couldn't get nominated by today's Republican party because he'd be branded a RINO just as Mitt Romney and John Kasich were.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,152
6,791
113
You people crack me up with your RINO nonsense. The patron saint of the GOP, Ronald Reagan, couldn't get nominated by today's Republican party because he'd be branded a RINO just as Mitt Romney and John Kasich were.
Reagan was very conservative and you are showing your bias in saying that.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,152
6,791
113
Why not? Do you understand the function of the Clinton Foundation? Or, like the Wall Street Journal and others, are you conflating it with the Clinton Family Foundation?

The CF spent 10% on charity. Did you happen to hear about the hurricane is going to it Haiti? It's been 6 years and people are still sleeping in tents. That's what happens when countries and mega large business men donate to the CF and only 10% goes to Haiti or other charities. The rest is used to pay Chelsea $600,000/year and to purchase her a 10,000,000 apartment. To be a charity, for anybody, you should have to spend 80% on charity. It was and is, pay for play.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,597
812
113
Why not? Do you understand the function of the Clinton Foundation? Or, like the Wall Street Journal and others, are you conflating it with the Clinton Family Foundation?
Once again you are clueless about a subject and spewing the lefts talking points.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
If you find someone saying "no he didn't" over and over as direct contradictions to the truth, yes Pence won the night but will lose the week which is Jake Tappers entire quote. But those denials will come back to haunt him as the Dems now have video and sound of even more boldface lies from the entire GOP team.

But regardless, that 90 minutes last night didn't influence many voters one way or the other. For interested individuals, it was worth watching. For most of America, they will have no clue about the event.
Damn, you are putting it in a no win for Trump just like most expected from the liberal press.

Trump chased the rabbits Hillary gave to him. Trump was reported to have lost his debate because he did not address the important issues while he was defending HIMSELF against the personal attacks she made. Last night Pence refused to fall into the trap of defending Trump against the personal attacks and addressed the issues the public wants addressed. MSNBC and CNN were laughing their asses off after the debate because Pence lost the affair because he was stuttering while trying to get a word in and the opposition near totally shut him out.

Damned if you do and damned if you don't situation you are putting them into. They cannot win. You offer "no he didn't" as proof Pence didn't defend Trump. You offer that as a "direct contradiction to the truth"? That is not good reasoning since you do not know the truth about that clown's comments. Further Trapper says it will cost them the week since it will be shown as Pence is not supporting Trump.

Amazing both of those liberal channels opened in concert with some version of "Pence was there to push his candidacy for 2020 instead of supporting Trump". That is roughly what Hillary's camp said immediately after the debate. Reminded on Bill's days of impropriety. The day after the news broke, every Democrat in DC was singing the same song as Hillary. Sorta like an organized use of a word or thought by all Democrats and media. The word for the day was tacked to Hillary and released thru her network. This happened all the time they were in WH and she had the organization in Ark. Now she is bringing the word of the day to her attempt to distort again.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Why not? Do you understand the function of the Clinton Foundation? Or, like the Wall Street Journal and others, are you conflating it with the Clinton Family Foundation?
The Clinton charities maze is like a can of worms to me. I would greatly appreciate the assigned function of each of the very large number of charities they have organized over the short period of time. Serious. I speculate the depth is for the purpose of confusing everyone.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You people crack me up with your RINO nonsense. The patron saint of the GOP, Ronald Reagan, couldn't get nominated by today's Republican party because he'd be branded a RINO just as Mitt Romney and John Kasich were.
Damn, you are a pathetic source. Putting Reagan in the same category or sentence with Mitt is approaching blasphemy. You need to apologize to all conservatives. Kasich was my choice for VP with Bush. Bush fell out of consideration when Trump confirmed he was running. At this time, I would not support Bush, Romney or Kasich. When they openly oppose the party choice in favor of a Clinton, knowing her history, I will have no further use for them.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
The CF spent 10% on charity. Did you happen to hear about the hurricane is going to it Haiti? It's been 6 years and people are still sleeping in tents. That's what happens when countries and mega large business men donate to the CF and only 10% goes to Haiti or other charities. The rest is used to pay Chelsea $600,000/year and to purchase her a 10,000,000 apartment. To be a charity, for anybody, you should have to spend 80% on charity. It was and is, pay for play.
Hard to ignore that, but some of our associates bow their head and ignore it for the party.
 

Popeer

Freshman
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
The CF spent 10% on charity. Did you happen to hear about the hurricane is going to it Haiti? It's been 6 years and people are still sleeping in tents. That's what happens when countries and mega large business men donate to the CF and only 10% goes to Haiti or other charities. The rest is used to pay Chelsea $600,000/year and to purchase her a 10,000,000 apartment. To be a charity, for anybody, you should have to spend 80% on charity. It was and is, pay for play.
Yeah, keep squawking that stuff. The Clinton Foundation isn't a charity and it isn't set up to donate to charities, it's set up to fund programs. At least mneilmont has the guts to say he's confused about it instead of parroting BS.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,152
6,791
113
Yeah, keep squawking that stuff. The Clinton Foundation isn't a charity and it isn't set up to donate to charities, it's set up to fund programs. At least mneilmont has the guts to say he's confused about it instead of parroting BS.

Well, 10% going to help other people vs 90% to line their collective pockets, is too much for the Foundation. I will say it again, any charitable foundation should have to meet 20% overhead, which is too much, and 80% charity or they should be made to refund all monies. The proper amount should be 15%/85
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,152
6,791
113
The Clinton charities maze is like a can of worms to me. I would greatly appreciate the assigned function of each of the very large number of charities they have organized over the short period of time. Serious. I speculate the depth is for the purpose of confusing everyone.

I'm surprised that it was set up to confuse people, not. It was and is a slush fund for all things Clinton. Donate to a fund in Canada, don't have to disclose donors, which then moves monies to the US based Foundation which then pays Chelsea $600,000 for having to put up with her dad, and buying her a 10 mill apartment. They are entitled.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Lol, Have ya'll dissected Trumps Charity that they just told to stop accepting donations? Nah, ya'll probably donated to it.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Yeah, keep squawking that stuff. The Clinton Foundation isn't a charity and it isn't set up to donate to charities, it's set up to fund programs. At least mneilmont has the guts to say he's confused about it instead of parroting BS.
Why would you use me as a source of not knowing when you will not educate me as to the function of the depth of the charities? Are you telling me that my speculation is incorrect? Shame on you If you are going to make such a statement without telling me the functions of so many. Neil doesn't know, but I would be willing to bet it is not to maximize the taxes. Further would bet that it is a tax dodge.

Do you agree with anything that I say except the confusing part?
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Did you happen to hear about the hurricane is going to it Haiti? It's been 6 years and people are still sleeping in tents. That's what happens when countries and mega large business men donate to the CF and only 10% goes to Haiti or other charities. The rest is used to pay Chelsea $600,000/year and to purchase her a 10,000,000 apartment. To be a charity, for anybody, you should have to spend 80% on charity. It was and is, pay for play.

Haiti has a very corrupt government; that's why some are still in tents...and they are the second poorest country in the world.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,152
6,791
113
Haiti has a very corrupt government; that's why some are still in tents...and they are the second poorest country in the world.

I will stick with my premise that the billionaire from Ireland donated massive amount of money to the CF in return for the cell phone monopoly in Haiti. Haiti is corrupt and so is the CF.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Lol, Have ya'll dissected Trumps Charity that they just told to stop accepting donations? Nah, ya'll probably donated to it.
No donation to Trump charities, but I am getting my donation out to Joe Wilson for Congress. If you would like to donate, do so to PO Box2456, Springfield, Va 22152-0456.

If you would prefer to contribute to a female, may I offer Congresswoman Mia Love, UT-4, PO box 96112, Washington, DC 20090.

And Sheriff Joe Arpaio could use help in legal or reelection fund.

Won't you hep these red blooded Americans in public service.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,152
6,791
113
Lol, Have ya'll dissected Trumps Charity that they just told to stop accepting donations? Nah, ya'll probably donated to it.

I would say it's corrupt too. How's that? Of course, Trump's didn't sell cell phone monopoly to foreign billionaire from Ireland for a large donation to Chelsea's apartment.