Gary Johnson apparently isn't ready for prime time either....
- Thread starter RichardPeterJohnson
- Start date
Aleppo? Isn't that what you get when Hilliary falls and has a concussion? Oh, it's amnesia not alleppo.
What do you expect from an idiot that doesn't even know if America was justified entering WW2 ? But hey, certain whackos here will say over and over how wonderful and smart he is.
Morons
I can't believe we've narrowed the pool down to this. I want a re-do.Voting for Jill Stein then?
As I've said many times, never underestimate the stupidity of the American people. As Winston Churchill once said, the best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter.
Saw it in the Dem primary as well. Electing Hillary Clinton is as idiotic as they come.
Then again we elected Obama twice.
Assuming that you're referring to reported chlorine use but other than to say gotcha why is this important to you? Do you want us to escalate military action in Syria? Does it warrant it? If true, I hope that the fallout was limited and the use not repeated because I would not like to see use escalate the war in Syria with troops on the ground or whatever that would involve but I don't want to see unfettered chemical use/genocide there either.
Yea, that was pretty bad. I actually agree that it is something that he should have known without having to ask. The reality is, as President, he will have to deal with International issues whether he believes that the US should be involved or not.
You really need to stop harping on that one. You look foolish when you aren't able to discern the context of his answer being that the answer was complex given that the US might have been able to stay out of that war had FDR taken different steps. FDR wanted in the war but could not get the approval until Pearl Harbor happened as most Americans at the time wanted nothing to do with another European war. He sidestepped a lot of measures put in place by congress which stripped the Pacific fleet of equipment and was shipping stuff to England prior to 41. Additionally, we were advising in China after Japan invaded in Manchuria in 31 and the measures we took there to try and starve Japan of oil and Steel essentially necessitated their attack on us to continue their advances.
So clearly, when asked if we should have been involved in WW2, it's not a simple yes or no if you are a student of history.
And let's not forget, the Germans were already sinking American shipping long before Pearl Harbor.
You have to excuse Bru, he's got a hard-on against Libertarians... one must have killed his puppy long ago.
Ok, you're playing gotcha, that's fine and a common message board game. Carry on.
I'll answer your questions, you answer mine. Obviously he made the red line comments as a hopeful deterrent but it didn't work. I believe the BO recognized that it was a mistake to make the red line comment as we haven't taken a increased military response to the use of chemical weapons. I'm glad that BO has not backed up his red line statement and fortunately the use of chemical weapons there seems to have been very limited with no more reports until recent. Making empty threats is not a good practice. What do you think the prez should have done after the first use of chemical weapons or right now, after recent reports of their use? Are you in favor of increased U.S. military involvement in Syria?
It depends on your point of view. Is Assad crap? Yes. Will he keep the jihadists under wraps? Yes. So it's kind of a push
The dems had Hillary and a socialist. GOP had a much better pool of candidates to pick from, then chaos ensued to give us cheetohead.
I didn't remember it until Syria was mentioned. Still 100 times better candidate than the other two.
15% is for this year's debates, right? I believe there's a smaller threshold that gives the party public $, and he should hit that.
Added: The public money would come in 2020
Clearly once that happened our involvement into WW2 wasn't debatable. I can see you are taking the simpleton's approach to the question which would make sense considering your insistent responses being what they are. At least I hope you are intentionally taking that approach, otherwise I gave you more credit than you deserve. I'll start typing slower for you in the future just to be sure.
It is really a simple topic. Morons like you should even understand it. Pearl Harbor was bombed, the congress declared war, anyone saying the country wasn't justified is stupid. And you somehow wanting to whine about crap just takes stupidity to a different level. Just shut up.
Not sure how many times I've said and have to say that once we were bombed, discussion over.
The point of the discussion and why he stated he wasn't sure was because of the 10 years leading up to 12/7 could have been handled differently which would have likely prevented our involvement because had they been handled differently, the IJN may not have bombed us at all. When you are wrong and out of your league just admit it and move on Bru.
Ya know what? Never mind, you aren't worth my time. I'm done with your dumb *** on this one. Be sure to keep updating us about his response that you clearly can't comprehend though. Old age is a *****.