http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016...ers-injured-during-clash-outside-trump-rally/
I'm not a supporter... but simpleton views of the man drives me insane.
I'm not a supporter... but simpleton views of the man drives me insane.
Any mugshot photos of those arrested yet?http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016...ers-injured-during-clash-outside-trump-rally/
I'm not a supporter... but simpleton views of the man drives me insane.
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016...ers-injured-during-clash-outside-trump-rally/
I'm not a supporter... but simpleton views of the man drives me insane.
Looks like four officers were injured. Two of them will probably be suspended for shoving a news lady. Mayor has been made aware of the incident. Officers were kicked and pepper sprayed and at least one was kicked while down. Will be interesting how they are handled.Any mugshot photos of those arrested yet?
It is perfectly OK to oppose him, but when opposition gets physical to show displeasure, they are approaching anarchy.http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016...ers-injured-during-clash-outside-trump-rally/
I'm not a supporter... but simpleton views of the man drives me insane.
It is perfectly OK to oppose him, but when opposition gets physical to show displeasure, they are approaching anarchy.
If Trump goes in with less than 1237, this may get entertaining.Just wait until the convention. You haven't seen anything yet.
Yes, I would expect Mr Kasich's exec. abilities will be tested. Just for the hell of it, how would you(anyone) handle it? Remember Chicago handled it, but were chastised for tactics.Just wait until the convention. You haven't seen anything yet.
I am not sure the number actually matters. Trump will be enough. Nearness to the number may give rise to what people will do, IMO.If Trump goes in with less than 1237, this may get entertaining.
How does it originate? Who/how causes it to process? Is it like Hillary said that a bunch of people were just walking thru town and decided to kill 4 Americans?Let me ask you this. If a bunch of rabid white ex military conservatives showed up a democratic candidate's rally and started talking trash and pushing people around would you be saying Clinton or Sanders is inciting violence? I doubt it. Just for information Conservatives have the same basic rights to free expression as do radical commies. Remember that.
Let me ask you this. If a bunch of rabid white ex military conservatives showed up a democratic candidate's rally and started talking trash and pushing people around would you be saying Clinton or Sanders is inciting violence? I doubt it. Just for information Conservatives have the same basic rights to free expression as do radical commies. Remember that.
There it is....Trump's fault that anarchist organizations are showing up to his rallies with a preemptive plan to invite violence as evidenced by their attacking police. Nice logic.Let me know when Clinton or Sanders says "I'd like to punch him right in the face", or "maybe he should have been roughed up", or "carry them out on a stretcher", or "let's do worse than waterboarding".
There it is....Trump's fault that anarchist organizations are showing up to his rallies with a preemptive plan to invite violence as evidenced by their attacking police. Nice logic.
What does any of that have to do with the above article in Pittsburgh? Are you saying people are coming looking for a fight?His own campaign manager has attacked two different reporters....yeah, that was the "anarchists" fault. And the poor guy walking up the steps in NC...his face just got in the way of the old racist's elbow.
"Attacked"? Must have been a brutal assault. So much so that the State of FL isn't pursuing criminal charges.His own campaign manager has attacked two different reporters....yeah, that was the "anarchists" fault. And the poor guy walking up the steps in NC...his face just got in the way of the old racist's elbow.
"Attacked"? Must have been a brutal assault. So much so that the State of FL isn't pursuing criminal charges.
The NC thing I can see, but I'm not sure you can classify him as being racist based on the current information. As it stands, it was a white guy hitting a black guy. Is it your position anytime there is violence between people of different races that the violence is always based on racial issues? Wouldn't that also make it a hate crime?
And as stated previously, what do either of those incidents have to do with people showing up to an opposing candidate's campaign rally to bring violence? Also, most of these people are Bernie and Hillary supporters. Shouldn't they (Bernie/Hillary) be openly condemning this type of behavior to try and calm the waters? I mean, I actually agree with you on the point of Trump. He has a responsibility to not incite violence. I agree with that and I think his comments were way out of line.
Food for thought, are Trump supporters showing up to Hillary/Bernie rallies and causing a problem or inciting violence? I mean we do have verified proof Bernie and Hillary supporters are and yet the blame is going to Trump. Seems backwards to me.
So, because Florida is not pursuing charges means an assault/battery didn't happen? Not enough evidence is total BS, it was caught on camera.
I'm not saying anytime it's white on black that it's racially motivated. But do you remember the old white guy saying "next time I'll kill you"?
No, I don't, but I admittedly don't get outraged over what the media tells me I should be outraged about. I've long since decided I wasn't voting for Trump, these incidents do nothing to move the needle for me.So, because Florida is not pursuing charges means an assault/battery didn't happen? Not enough evidence is total BS, it was caught on camera.
I'm not saying anytime it's white on black that it's racially motivated. But do you remember the old white guy saying "next time I'll kill you"?
Even my most liberal bleeding heart friends felt that that video was way too inconclusive to prove any "assault".
Doesn't matter, it has absolutely nothing to do with the above article, which I see you continue to not address my points.
I guess you are incapable of understanding sarcasm? Have you actually read the article? Every response in this thread you have made would lead me to believe you have not.The title of the thread is "trump incites violence".
Yea, I don't think there's any question whether Trump incites this. I don't recall routine scuffles at Kasich, Cruz, Clinton or Sanders rallies. This is the result of Trump doing what he does.Let me know when Clinton or Sanders says "I'd like to punch him right in the face", or "maybe he should have been roughed up", or "carry them out on a stretcher", or "let's do worse than waterboarding".
Absolutely true. And right wingers can't comprehend. I would say amazing but it is actually typical.Yea, I don't think there's any question whether Trump incites this. I don't recall routine scuffles at Kasich, Cruz, Clinton or Sanders rallies. This is the result of Trump doing what he does.
It's very typical. He draws a crowd, and not a good one.Absolutely true. And right wingers can't comprehend. I would say amazing but it is actually typical.
How can you justify "not a good one"? Do you know anyone in the crowd well enough to call them "not good"? If you are referring to the size of the crowd(probably), they are damned good.It's very typical. He draws a crowd, and not a good one.
Did you read the title of this thread?How can you justify "not a good one"? Do you know anyone in the crowd well enough to call them "not good"? If you are referring to the size of the crowd(probably), they are damned good.
Well, I guess everyone would say Clinton and Sanders are pussies. Who remembers Hillary as Sec of State refusing to place Boko Haram on terrorist list after being urged to do so by Justice, FBI, CIA and many Senators after terrorist activity. She had a chance to alter some history, but inaction on her part allowed for capture/kidnap of a few hundred Nigerian girls by the group. Now Hillary wants to be instrumental in "Bring our Girls Home" movement. She sat on her *** while the group committed terrorist acts including capture and kill and now she wants someone else to do what she wouldn't. Another instance where her inability to act cost lives.Yea, I don't think there's any question whether Trump incites this. I don't recall routine scuffles at Kasich, Cruz, Clinton or Sanders rallies. This is the result of Trump doing what he does.
Yes, did you read the body? Headlines are often misleading.Did you read the title of this thread?
Probably because Bernie isnt paying people 15 an hour to agitate at the other rallies.Yea, I don't think there's any question whether Trump incites this. I don't recall routine scuffles at Kasich, Cruz, Clinton or Sanders rallies. This is the result of Trump doing what he does.
This might be the dumbest post you have ever made. You really are clueless. Go watch the news and lap up the idiocy.It's very typical. He draws a crowd, and not a good one.
Vivid memory of groups being bussed in out in desert. That would be hard to impromptu gathering of bus transported. Someone with some deep pockets was involved in planning and finance.Probably because Bernie isnt paying people 15 an hour to agitate at the other rallies.
Let me know when Clinton or Sanders says "I'd like to punch him right in the face", or "maybe he should have been roughed up", or "carry them out on a stretcher", or "let's do worse than waterboarding".
Vivid memory of groups being bussed in out in desert. That would be hard to impromptu gathering of bus transported. Someone with some deep pockets was involved in planning and finance.
This might be the dumbest post you have ever made. You really are clueless. Go watch the news and lap up the idiocy.