You'd definitely never ever see anything like that in the US with our democracy and capitalistic society.
Never, until the GOP convention this summer.
You'd definitely never ever see anything like that in the US with our democracy and capitalistic society.
You'd definitely never ever see anything like that in the US with our democracy and capitalistic society.
Welfare attempts to cover expenses, and that's the idea behind setting a minimum wage. If welfare is more lucrative than a job, we need to address the wage issue.
What Americans know about socialism
![]()
Socialism
![]()
You want higher wages, stop all the illegals coming in here competing for jobs that drive down the wages. Do away with job killing regulations. Do away with ACA. Illegals drive down wages, pure and simple and the liberals want more of them. It's a contradiction.
So, you don't see Mexicans in your area doing carpentry? Painting? Working on grounds crews at golf courses? Look, if you don't think that they drive down wages for those tasks, you're delusional. If the places that hire these guys had to hire "Americans" they would pay more to get the help. There's more illegals and legal meixcans, etc looking to work and that prevents an upward pressure on wages. Fewer workers= higher wages. Pretty simple. It's a ripple effect.Most of the jobs the illegals take are jobs that most Americans wouldn't take anyway, so there is really no "driving down wages". There are a lot of seasonal and hard manual labor jobs. Picking fruit, shucking oysters, etc. They live in one area when something is in season there and then move to another area when something is in season over there.
So, you don't see Mexicans in your area doing carpentry? Painting? Working on grounds crews at golf courses? Look, if you don't think that they drive down wages for those tasks, you're delusional. If the places that hire these guys had to hire "Americans" they would pay more to get the help. There's more illegals and legal meixcans, etc looking to work and that prevents an upward pressure on wages. Fewer workers= higher wages. Pretty simple. It's a ripple effect.
I remember lots of kids working as baggers and stockers in grocery stores. I also remember folks who worked as butchers and managers and buyers who did that as a means to support a family. And they could do those jobs and support a family. I also know people from my home town who lost their small businesses when Walmart moved into town. I know some of those people ended up working at Walmart after their businesses went under. It's not a black and white issue. I also tend to agree with Whitetail that the government subsidies for these business practices that help the people who are getting low wages is a much less efficient way to address the problem.I'm playing devil's advocate. Again, grocery store employees used to be 90% high school and college kids trying to make a few extra dollars after school. Just like fast food. Now it's 90% people's fulltime jobs(at just under 30 hrs per week, thanks Obama), that have shifted since manufacturing employment has declined. Just because it is big business Wal-Mart doesn't make it not a grocery store. All grocery stores have had this impact them. They are doing what they always have, but now you're expecting their market to change because others' employments have changed. That's not necessarily going to happen. Since they're the example, I will use them. The Walton's are going to get theirs no matter how much you increase their cost of business. That will mean higher prices grocery prices for us peons. So it's either us as taxpayers or us as consumers that are going to feel the pain. I don't see the difference.
Also in that defense stance, I would counter with, government policies and regulations have increased everyone's cost of living. Now they're attempting to make me pay more for my employees because of what they've done.
Yes, in both cases its the same people--people who want someone else to subsidize their lives.You'd definitely never ever see anything like that in the US with our democracy and capitalistic society.
Yes, in both cases its the same people--people who want someone else to subsidize their lives.
The pictures I posted are European rioters whose benefits were reduced because their country went bankrupt.Or because their team won the Stanley Cup
The picture I posted are European rioters whose benefits were reduced because their country went bankrupt.
The pictures I posted are European rioters whose benefits were reduced because their country went bankrupt.
Specifically Greece, right?
You totally missed the point.I get that, but there are other reasons for riots that we see in this country all the time that are far more trivial than that. To paint this as a strictly socialist phenomenon is disingenuous. People have gotten killed over labor strikes, for instance. The only time you aren't going to see people rise up is when they are too afraid to do so ... and I think we can agree that we don't want to live in a place like that.
You totally missed the point.
This is a very good parallel to other people who spoke of investing in one's self and learn a specialty that makes the meat man, buyer and manager more valuable than a stocker or bagger in the hierarchy in grocery stores. The pay is great enough to feed a family after you have become proficient and accept the responsibility. Those entry level jobs do not require much talent like the manager or meat man.I remember lots of kids working as baggers and stockers in grocery stores. I also remember folks who worked as butchers and managers and buyers who did that as a means to support a family. And they could do those jobs and support a family. I also know people from my home town who lost their small businesses when Walmart moved into town. I know some of those people ended up working at Walmart after their businesses went under. It's not a black and white issue. I also tend to agree with Whitetail that the government subsidies for these business practices that help the people who are getting low wages is a much less efficient way to address the problem.
Here's the difference as I see it. We are not paying for these subsidies. We are going into debt to provide these subsidies, and we have been doing that for a while. Any correction we try to make is going to be a shock to the economy. Raising the minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 over a period of a few years is going to hurt. It has to be a slow burn in order to work. You have to build it on a schedule, and you have to stay on the schedule (can't have another bill in 2 years that slows things down). At the end of that schedule, you hope to have something that is a living wage set as the minimum. Once you've reached that point (maybe 10 years out), you also index that wage in order to keep it current. The minimum wage shouldn't be stagnant for years at a time. It makes it impossible to adjust without hurting the economy. If it increases with inflation, you lose the shocks to the system.
To answer your question, no, I don't see them in my area, but that's also not really a very valid counter to your argument due to where I live. My area is a bad example. Small town WV.
Honestly the only time I've seen them around here have been on tree trimming crews ... and of course mexican restaurants.
To answer your question, no, I don't see them in my area, but that's also not really a very valid counter to your argument due to where I live. My area is a bad example. Small town WV.
Honestly the only time I've seen them around here have been on tree trimming crews ... and of course mexican restaurants.
South Carolina has a great approach to educating/training to fill industry needs. Kids can get three years of training in public education plus technical school in post grad community school.I see it all the time with various trades, especially finish trades.
Unfortunately, it's all that's out there. We are losing skilled workers at a record pace and finding only individuals capable of filling those positions is next to impossible.
Trump told the crowd in the 'burg last night that he would revive the coal and steel industries. People cheered loudly.I see it all the time with various trades, especially finish trades.
Unfortunately, it's all that's out there. We are losing skilled workers at a record pace and finding only individuals capable of filling those positions is next to impossible.
Trump told the crowd in the 'burg last night that he would revive the coal and steel industries. People cheered loudly.
Democratic socialism ALWAYS becomes facism (we are there now) and later turns to communism/oppression/dictatorships....(probably a 15-20 years from now).
I learn so much on this board, thanks.Democratic socialism ALWAYS becomes facism (we are there now) and later turns to communism/oppression/dictatorships....(probably a 15-20 years from now).
Trump told the crowd in the 'burg last night that he would revive the coal and steel industries. People cheered loudly.
allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...
Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..
yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...
We already drill the Gulf. Maybe you missed this:allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...
Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..
yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...
Say what?
U.S. to open more drilling sites in Gulf of Mexico
The U.S. Energy Information Administration in a report estimated crude oil production from basins in the Gulf of Mexico is on pace to reach record levels by next year. Production should average about 1.6 million barrels per day this year and increase 17 percent by the end of 2017 to 1.91 million bpd. By then, output from the Gulf of Mexico will account for about 21 percent of total U.S. crude oil production.
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/En...illing-sites-in-Gulf-of-Mexico/7361455877709/
You are finally coming around to having productive input on the board.allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...
Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..
yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...
You are finally coming around to having productive input on the board.
Difference between laughing with you and laughing at you dog.like i recognize your name, anyway
but everyone knows mofo
Difference between laughing with you and laughing at you dog.
I am sure that has a meaning - to you. I don't post for credits. What is the prize you get for that recognition? Honestly, I always get you and Moe confused. Unless it is something of interest, I never look at author. This is the first time I have ever had cause to look more closely at your offerings.like i recognize your name, anyway
but everyone knows mofo
I am sure that has a meaning - to you. I don't post for credits. What is the prize you get for that recognition? Honestly, I always get you and Moe confused. Unless it is something of interest, I never look at author. This is the first time I have ever had cause to look more closely at your offerings.
The entire city of New York rejected socialism last night.
Sanders got more votes than Trump and Kasich combined.The entire city of New York rejected socialism last night.
Sanders got more votes than Trump and Kasich combined.