'Democratic' Socialism

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,138
6,775
113
Welfare attempts to cover expenses, and that's the idea behind setting a minimum wage. If welfare is more lucrative than a job, we need to address the wage issue.

You want higher wages, stop all the illegals coming in here competing for jobs that drive down the wages. Do away with job killing regulations. Do away with ACA. Illegals drive down wages, pure and simple and the liberals want more of them. It's a contradiction.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
What Americans know about socialism


Socialism

Thanks for proving our point. Greece is a capitalistic democracy, similar to the US in many ways.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
You want higher wages, stop all the illegals coming in here competing for jobs that drive down the wages. Do away with job killing regulations. Do away with ACA. Illegals drive down wages, pure and simple and the liberals want more of them. It's a contradiction.

Most of the jobs the illegals take are jobs that most Americans wouldn't take anyway, so there is really no "driving down wages". There are a lot of seasonal and hard manual labor jobs. Picking fruit, shucking oysters, etc. They live in one area when something is in season there and then move to another area when something is in season over there.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,138
6,775
113
Most of the jobs the illegals take are jobs that most Americans wouldn't take anyway, so there is really no "driving down wages". There are a lot of seasonal and hard manual labor jobs. Picking fruit, shucking oysters, etc. They live in one area when something is in season there and then move to another area when something is in season over there.
So, you don't see Mexicans in your area doing carpentry? Painting? Working on grounds crews at golf courses? Look, if you don't think that they drive down wages for those tasks, you're delusional. If the places that hire these guys had to hire "Americans" they would pay more to get the help. There's more illegals and legal meixcans, etc looking to work and that prevents an upward pressure on wages. Fewer workers= higher wages. Pretty simple. It's a ripple effect.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
So, you don't see Mexicans in your area doing carpentry? Painting? Working on grounds crews at golf courses? Look, if you don't think that they drive down wages for those tasks, you're delusional. If the places that hire these guys had to hire "Americans" they would pay more to get the help. There's more illegals and legal meixcans, etc looking to work and that prevents an upward pressure on wages. Fewer workers= higher wages. Pretty simple. It's a ripple effect.

To answer your question, no, I don't see them in my area, but that's also not really a very valid counter to your argument due to where I live. My area is a bad example. Small town WV.

Honestly the only time I've seen them around here have been on tree trimming crews ... and of course mexican restaurants.
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,438
58
48
I'm playing devil's advocate. Again, grocery store employees used to be 90% high school and college kids trying to make a few extra dollars after school. Just like fast food. Now it's 90% people's fulltime jobs(at just under 30 hrs per week, thanks Obama), that have shifted since manufacturing employment has declined. Just because it is big business Wal-Mart doesn't make it not a grocery store. All grocery stores have had this impact them. They are doing what they always have, but now you're expecting their market to change because others' employments have changed. That's not necessarily going to happen. Since they're the example, I will use them. The Walton's are going to get theirs no matter how much you increase their cost of business. That will mean higher prices grocery prices for us peons. So it's either us as taxpayers or us as consumers that are going to feel the pain. I don't see the difference.

Also in that defense stance, I would counter with, government policies and regulations have increased everyone's cost of living. Now they're attempting to make me pay more for my employees because of what they've done.
I remember lots of kids working as baggers and stockers in grocery stores. I also remember folks who worked as butchers and managers and buyers who did that as a means to support a family. And they could do those jobs and support a family. I also know people from my home town who lost their small businesses when Walmart moved into town. I know some of those people ended up working at Walmart after their businesses went under. It's not a black and white issue. I also tend to agree with Whitetail that the government subsidies for these business practices that help the people who are getting low wages is a much less efficient way to address the problem.

Here's the difference as I see it. We are not paying for these subsidies. We are going into debt to provide these subsidies, and we have been doing that for a while. Any correction we try to make is going to be a shock to the economy. Raising the minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 over a period of a few years is going to hurt. It has to be a slow burn in order to work. You have to build it on a schedule, and you have to stay on the schedule (can't have another bill in 2 years that slows things down). At the end of that schedule, you hope to have something that is a living wage set as the minimum. Once you've reached that point (maybe 10 years out), you also index that wage in order to keep it current. The minimum wage shouldn't be stagnant for years at a time. It makes it impossible to adjust without hurting the economy. If it increases with inflation, you lose the shocks to the system.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
The picture I posted are European rioters whose benefits were reduced because their country went bankrupt.

I get that, but there are other reasons for riots that we see in this country all the time that are far more trivial than that. To paint this as a strictly socialist phenomenon is disingenuous. People have gotten killed over labor strikes, for instance. The only time you aren't going to see people rise up is when they are too afraid to do so ... and I think we can agree that we don't want to live in a place like that.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
I get that, but there are other reasons for riots that we see in this country all the time that are far more trivial than that. To paint this as a strictly socialist phenomenon is disingenuous. People have gotten killed over labor strikes, for instance. The only time you aren't going to see people rise up is when they are too afraid to do so ... and I think we can agree that we don't want to live in a place like that.
You totally missed the point.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I remember lots of kids working as baggers and stockers in grocery stores. I also remember folks who worked as butchers and managers and buyers who did that as a means to support a family. And they could do those jobs and support a family. I also know people from my home town who lost their small businesses when Walmart moved into town. I know some of those people ended up working at Walmart after their businesses went under. It's not a black and white issue. I also tend to agree with Whitetail that the government subsidies for these business practices that help the people who are getting low wages is a much less efficient way to address the problem.

Here's the difference as I see it. We are not paying for these subsidies. We are going into debt to provide these subsidies, and we have been doing that for a while. Any correction we try to make is going to be a shock to the economy. Raising the minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 over a period of a few years is going to hurt. It has to be a slow burn in order to work. You have to build it on a schedule, and you have to stay on the schedule (can't have another bill in 2 years that slows things down). At the end of that schedule, you hope to have something that is a living wage set as the minimum. Once you've reached that point (maybe 10 years out), you also index that wage in order to keep it current. The minimum wage shouldn't be stagnant for years at a time. It makes it impossible to adjust without hurting the economy. If it increases with inflation, you lose the shocks to the system.
This is a very good parallel to other people who spoke of investing in one's self and learn a specialty that makes the meat man, buyer and manager more valuable than a stocker or bagger in the hierarchy in grocery stores. The pay is great enough to feed a family after you have become proficient and accept the responsibility. Those entry level jobs do not require much talent like the manager or meat man.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,138
6,775
113
To answer your question, no, I don't see them in my area, but that's also not really a very valid counter to your argument due to where I live. My area is a bad example. Small town WV.

Honestly the only time I've seen them around here have been on tree trimming crews ... and of course mexican restaurants.

There are a lot here in Roanoke. We have translators coming to my dental office with patients and I know a little to get by.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
To answer your question, no, I don't see them in my area, but that's also not really a very valid counter to your argument due to where I live. My area is a bad example. Small town WV.

Honestly the only time I've seen them around here have been on tree trimming crews ... and of course mexican restaurants.

I see it all the time with various trades, especially finish trades.

Unfortunately, it's all that's out there. We are losing skilled workers at a record pace and finding only individuals capable of filling those positions is next to impossible.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I see it all the time with various trades, especially finish trades.

Unfortunately, it's all that's out there. We are losing skilled workers at a record pace and finding only individuals capable of filling those positions is next to impossible.
South Carolina has a great approach to educating/training to fill industry needs. Kids can get three years of training in public education plus technical school in post grad community school.

Industry can prepare curriculum to fit needs, and the schools will train to the industrial need. Welding is one trade that gets a lot of exposure, and I see other locations advertising for need in the welding. Seems that people are reluctant to relocate to find jobs.
Times have changed.
 

MountainBill

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
21,228
2
0
Democratic socialism ALWAYS becomes facism (we are there now) and later turns to communism/oppression/dictatorships....(probably a 15-20 years from now).
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I see it all the time with various trades, especially finish trades.

Unfortunately, it's all that's out there. We are losing skilled workers at a record pace and finding only individuals capable of filling those positions is next to impossible.
Trump told the crowd in the 'burg last night that he would revive the coal and steel industries. People cheered loudly.
 

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
Trump told the crowd in the 'burg last night that he would revive the coal and steel industries. People cheered loudly.

allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...

Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..

yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,830
271
83
allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...

Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..

yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...

Say what?

U.S. to open more drilling sites in Gulf of Mexico

The U.S. Energy Information Administration in a report estimated crude oil production from basins in the Gulf of Mexico is on pace to reach record levels by next year. Production should average about 1.6 million barrels per day this year and increase 17 percent by the end of 2017 to 1.91 million bpd. By then, output from the Gulf of Mexico will account for about 21 percent of total U.S. crude oil production.


http://www.upi.com/Business_News/En...illing-sites-in-Gulf-of-Mexico/7361455877709/
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,162
3,205
113
allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...

Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..

yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...
We already drill the Gulf. Maybe you missed this:

 

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
Say what?

U.S. to open more drilling sites in Gulf of Mexico

The U.S. Energy Information Administration in a report estimated crude oil production from basins in the Gulf of Mexico is on pace to reach record levels by next year. Production should average about 1.6 million barrels per day this year and increase 17 percent by the end of 2017 to 1.91 million bpd. By then, output from the Gulf of Mexico will account for about 21 percent of total U.S. crude oil production.


http://www.upi.com/Business_News/En...illing-sites-in-Gulf-of-Mexico/7361455877709/

t
yeah that's nice,
if environmental regulations didn't restrict close to shore drilling,
we would have to give a **** about
the middle east
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
allow the US to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, would be a nice idea...or less restitutions maybe a better term...

Fossil fuels has done so much for us, individually. ..

yes, there should be some environmental regulations. ...but China is the big environmental culprit. ...
You are finally coming around to having productive input on the board.
 

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
Difference between laughing with you and laughing at you dog.

did you all watch those
old codgers debate, last night?
H is tired

sorry D i don't recognize you, either ...

recommendation to both, make an opinion and stick w it...
not as childish or as easy, as trading quick insults
which in my mind is very boring
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
like i recognize your name, anyway

but everyone knows mofo
I am sure that has a meaning - to you. I don't post for credits. What is the prize you get for that recognition? Honestly, I always get you and Moe confused. Unless it is something of interest, I never look at author. This is the first time I have ever had cause to look more closely at your offerings.
 

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
I am sure that has a meaning - to you. I don't post for credits. What is the prize you get for that recognition? Honestly, I always get you and Moe confused. Unless it is something of interest, I never look at author. This is the first time I have ever had cause to look more closely at your offerings.

i could care, less