Big Bama OT N!! Official

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
No Nebraska needs serious help at OT.
And why is that? People, especially in the media, have been saying this. And over time, it's gone from being talked about as a need to now it's a serious need in the minds of many. But nobody says why. We've got some tackles in the program already going on their 2nd or 3rd year. Are all of these guys obvious busts? Or is there concern that we're too young at that spot?

The same media types were gravely concerned about Gunner Gottula as well. I suspect that some of these guys don't really have any idea what they are talking about.
 

RBigredMax

Redshirt
Mar 23, 2023
4,700
2
0
And why is that? People, especially in the media, have been saying this. And over time, it's gone from being talked about as a need to now it's a serious need in the minds of many. But nobody says why. We've got some tackles in the program already going on their 2nd or 3rd year. Are all of these guys obvious busts? Or is there concern that we're too young at that spot?

The same media types were gravely concerned about Gunner Gottula as well. I suspect that some of these guys don't really have any idea what they are talking about.
I think it’s more of a bridge year to get our young guys one more year. I’m sure they are serviceable but getting an extra boost to help them to third year is the push IMO.
 
Aug 6, 2009
15,511
9,089
0
And why is that? People, especially in the media, have been saying this. And over time, it's gone from being talked about as a need to now it's a serious need in the minds of many. But nobody says why. We've got some tackles in the program already going on their 2nd or 3rd year. Are all of these guys obvious busts? Or is there concern that we're too young at that spot?

The same media types were gravely concerned about Gunner Gottula as well. I suspect that some of these guys don't really have any idea what they are talking about.
My biggest concern is depth. Which everyone agrees we lack on the offensive line. Especially at tackle
 

Husker.Wed._rivals

All-Conference
Feb 13, 2004
17,670
3,753
98
And why is that? People, especially in the media, have been saying this. And over time, it's gone from being talked about as a need to now it's a serious need in the minds of many. But nobody says why. We've got some tackles in the program already going on their 2nd or 3rd year. Are all of these guys obvious busts? Or is there concern that we're too young at that spot?

The same media types were gravely concerned about Gunner Gottula as well. I suspect that some of these guys don't really have any idea what they are talking about.
I was sort of wondering the same thing so I looked at the top rushing teams this year. I didn't look at the service academies or mid majors, so looked at #8 Boise St, #9 Tennessee and #11 Notre Dame. Here is the class category of their starting and backup offensive lines this last year:

Boise St - (from left tackle to right tackle) SO, SR, JR, SO, SO; backups FR, JR, JR, SO JR

Tennessee - SO, SR, SR, SR, SR; backups SO, RFR, FR, SR. SR

Notre Dame - FR, SO JR, JR, SO; backups SR, FR, FR, FR, FR

So it looks to me like Boise and ND do just fine with underclassmen on their offensive lines. For the last three years we have recruited linemen we were excited about (e.g. Brix). Why do we need portal guys, can't our sophomores and RFRs play?
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,529
20,969
113
I was sort of wondering the same thing so I looked at the top rushing teams this year. I didn't look at the service academies or mid majors, so looked at #8 Boise St, #9 Tennessee and #11 Notre Dame. Here is the class category of their starting and backup offensive lines this last year:

Boise St - (from left tackle to right tackle) SO, SR, JR, SO, SO; backups FR, JR, JR, SO JR

Tennessee - SO, SR, SR, SR, SR; backups SO, RFR, FR, SR. SR

Notre Dame - FR, SO JR, JR, SO; backups SR, FR, FR, FR, FR

So it looks to me like Boise and ND do just fine with underclassmen on their offensive lines. For the last three years we have recruited linemen we were excited about (e.g. Brix). Why do we need portal guys, can't our sophomores and RFRs play?

If you look at Nebraska on paper at the end of the year we aren’t that different.

Nebraska- FR, SO, SR, JR, SR: backups FR, FR, FR, FR, FR

I think their short answer is the injuries to Corcoran and Teddy have hurt. We just don’t have much at OT. We are also taking, or trying to take portal players at the majority of positions. That is just the way of college football now. Oregon just took two OT’s from the portal, Ohio State has taken two. Michigan and LSU are still looking for portal OT’s.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,478
2,019
113
It's also the main reason we lose transfers to other schools.

NIL giveth and taketh away.
No it's not, except in rare cases like maybe Dowdell. We could have put together competitive offers for any of the players we lost. They left for other reasons. Dowdell is an exception because we valued him less than some other schools, and it's an assessment I agree with.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,478
2,019
113
I was sort of wondering the same thing so I looked at the top rushing teams this year. I didn't look at the service academies or mid majors, so looked at #8 Boise St, #9 Tennessee and #11 Notre Dame. Here is the class category of their starting and backup offensive lines this last year:

Boise St - (from left tackle to right tackle) SO, SR, JR, SO, SO; backups FR, JR, JR, SO JR

Tennessee - SO, SR, SR, SR, SR; backups SO, RFR, FR, SR. SR

Notre Dame - FR, SO JR, JR, SO; backups SR, FR, FR, FR, FR

So it looks to me like Boise and ND do just fine with underclassmen on their offensive lines. For the last three years we have recruited linemen we were excited about (e.g. Brix). Why do we need portal guys, can't our sophomores and RFRs play?
I'm fine with adding some pieces from the portal, but if Donovan is worth even a fraction of his salary, he should be able to develop talent from within the program.
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,500
15,736
113
Apparently he wasn't very good last year. Remains to be seen how he will do here. Has all the tools for sure.

Better than "depending" on Corcoran and Teddy I guess. Anything from those guys is extra I think.


Holla
 

WHCSC

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2002
10,894
3,737
88
Everyone has HPV
Donald Trump GIF by Election 2016
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,500
15,736
113
And why is that? People, especially in the media, have been saying this. And over time, it's gone from being talked about as a need to now it's a serious need in the minds of many. But nobody says why. We've got some tackles in the program already going on their 2nd or 3rd year. Are all of these guys obvious busts? Or is there concern that we're too young at that spot?

The same media types were gravely concerned about Gunner Gottula as well. I suspect that some of these guys don't really have any idea what they are talking about.

I've said this repeatedly. We all were lead to believe that Teddy and Turner were "must have" guys all off season. We lose Teddy and oh **** we are in trouble. Lose Turner and my God just forget the season. GG comes in and plays and to the naked eye the kid is every bit as good if not better than 7th year and 8th year COVID Jrs 😂 😂.

Seriously though seen the same thing at CB. Guy gets hurt ,backup Wright comes in and Immediately he's out best CB.

Lose LBs in the portal..ok V9 shows up and says hold my drink .

Makes you question do any of these guys ever know WTF they are talking about. Do coaches just play guys they feel comfortable knows the plays regardless of if they are worth a **** or not??


Holla
 

Neb79

Senior
Dec 1, 2024
351
405
58
Apparently he wasn't very good last year. Remains to be seen how he will do here. Has all the tools for sure.

Better than "depending" on Corcoran and Teddy I guess. Anything from those guys is extra I think.


Holla
Everything I have read indicates he was serviceable but his performance dropped precipitously the 2nd half of the year. Could be confidence issue or maybe he couldn’t catch up when the schedule became more SEC foes rather than out of conference. I don’t know. Maybe a nagging injury. Still, he started every game for Alabama so I guess you shoot for landing him and see which version of him shows up if he commits.
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,500
15,736
113
Everything I have read indicates he was serviceable but his performance dropped precipitously the 2nd half of the year. Could be confidence issue or maybe he couldn’t catch up when the schedule became more SEC foes rather than out of conference. I don’t know. Maybe a nagging injury. Still, he started every game for Alabama so I guess you shoot for landing him and see which version of him shows up if he commits.

Absolutely..he's worth the risk. In our situation currently if if he's serviceable he likely better than what we have outside of GG. Hopefully the young guys make a jump. But imo it's imperative we don't go into the year with our wagons dependent on Teddy and Turner staying healthy



Holla
 

TampaBaySkers

Senior
Oct 30, 2010
18,392
530
103
Don't be a fool. Wrap your tool.😌 Also, always inspect the playing surface before taking the field.
Yeah but too bad I’m usually in a drunken state so I default to - don’t be a dummy, pull out and bust on her tummy
 
Aug 27, 2006
27,799
5,566
0
Mixed feelings on this one... any dude who knowingly infects a chick like he did is a douche I wouldn't normally want anything to do with. Asmit I don't know the deets, maybe it isnt as bad as it sounds, but on the surface, not my kind of guy.
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
Mixed feelings on this one... any dude who knowingly infects a chick like he did is a douche I wouldn't normally want anything to do with. Asmit I don't know the deets, maybe it isnt as bad as it sounds, but on the surface, not my kind of guy.
DO you want to win? I mean come on...
Yeah Right Smile GIF by Apple TV