Enjoy the losses Bill
The game of purdys life produced 17 points
I don’t ignore anything, including the fact you are clueless. You, meanwhile, ignore purdys career long body of work and consider last week his base line instead of a huge outlier, which is what it was. Except for the result, of course, which was par for the loser course.
The difference between wins and losses is razor thin when your team sucks and your coaching staff is second guessing itself.
Not everything shows up in the stat sheet. Like being scared to death of contact so you run out of bounds a yard short of the sticks
The game of purdys life produced 17 points
I don’t ignore anything, including the fact you are clueless. You, meanwhile, ignore purdys career long body of work and consider last week his base line instead of a huge outlier, which is what it was. Except for the result, of course, which was par.
The difference between wins and losses is razor thin when your team sucks and your coaching staff is second guessing itself.
Not everything shows up in the stat sheet. Like being scared to death of contact so you run out of bounds a yard short of the sticks.
Here are some stats for you Kong
The NFL did a study on correlation between certain stats and wins. Was pretty good stuff.
Team with more yards won 67.5% of the time.
Team with less turnovers won 78.9% of the time
If you’re trying to create this notion that HH is a “winner” and that’s why they won the games when he started, that’s pure fallacy.
If HH won, it was DESPITE his turnovers which were the NFLs second largest stat predictor of victory (the largest predictor was rushing attempts - which predicted victory 80% of the time).
Haarberg led the nation in turnovers. That meant that we should have lost 78% of the games he played. Fact is that those wins were an OUTLIER given his performance.
The facts are that yards DO matter and turnovers matter even more.
So our interest in Purdy is not without reason and rationale. It goes beyond what our eyes see or what either you or us “feel”. The stats don’t lie over time. That’s why they exist.
