Raiola - no longer in the building

Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,982
0
The timing is curious. If Rhule is going to retain Raiola why wouldn't he have made official already so they could send Raiola out on the recruiting trail beginning today with no cloud over his retention? Maybe he's given Raiola some task to complete before he's let go? All the former assistant coaches are still officially on the payroll and obligated to work I guess if the new coach has something he wants them to do.
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
That's interesting. Is it possible that the future OL coach is committed to finishing the season at his present job? Or maybe Rhule has his eye on a guy working under a HC who is probably getting fired?
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,209
4,874
91
What some of us think about the worth of Raiola may not match what Rhule thinks about his worth. It's quite possible Raiola is all in on Rhule's vision for the offense. Or that Rhule hasn't settled on an Oline coach and Raiola is seen as a satisfactory safety choice.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,888
13,418
78
Isn't that our weakest area?
He didn’t recruit these guys but has a really good lineman from Texas committed. He also has two area kids committed who fit Rhule’s crteria. Raiola was dealt a crappy hand but had his patchwork line make gradual improvement. 99.9% of Husker fans don’t know much about the job he’s doing. They see their struggles and pin it all on the coach without any consideration for what the OC calls or having to play guys who should probably not be getting the time they’re getting.
 

SickOfPractice

Redshirt
Oct 10, 2021
2,997
1
0
Whatever happens with the OL position I guess in Rhule I trust, until a few games in next fall when I'll start to nitpick. 😂
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
I’ve posted from almost the start that I wouldn’t be shocked if he was retained.
Tough to make chicken salad out of chicken poop. Raiola took over a line that lost its best player to the draft and was so lacking in depth that they took in a couple very marginal transfers. Then there's the fact that he was teaching new techniques in a new offense under a head coach who would not let them go live contact more than a few times in the preseason. Hell, how many 3 win programs learning a new offense play touch football in their spring game?
 

catch54

Senior
Feb 5, 2003
30,298
635
113
He didn’t recruit these guys but has a really good lineman from Texas committed. He also has two area kids committed who fit Rhule’s crteria. Raiola was dealt a crappy hand but had his patchwork line make gradual improvement. 99.9% of Husker fans don’t know much about the job he’s doing. They see their struggles and pin it all on the coach without any consideration for what the OC calls or having to play guys who should probably not be getting the time they’re getting.
Exactly. I'd give Raiola another year rather than Whip who is thankfully gone.
 

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
I’ve posted from almost the start that I wouldn’t be shocked if he was retained.
Between Rhule and his staff, there will be plenty of support in helping Raiola incorporate Rhule's training for the OL. There's no doubt in my mind that Rhule believes the new S & C will impact the current OLmen we already have, not including any others that join through the recruits, portal, or JUCO's.

It also could be an issue with assistant budgets. Raiola is pretty cheap so that free's up more money to throw at a DC or other position coaches.

Rhule probably hasn't spent more than 3.5 million of the 7M allotted for staff members. That would allow 3.5 million yet to be spent on a TE coach, DC, LB coach, and WR coach.

Figure less than 2M for the TE, LB, and WR coach and still leaves 1.5M for a DC.

**Edited** Found out from another poster that the OC would also coach the TE's. So more money available to fill out the staff. **
 
Last edited:

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,888
13,418
78
Exactly. I'd give Raiola another year rather than Whip who is thankfully gone.
We’ll see. Raiola could still walk on his own even if Rhule wanted to keep him. I just think Raiola got a bad rap from our fans.
 

Husker1078

Junior
Mar 2, 2006
2,085
331
73
Im supportive of the hire and all but if Raiola is retained, I would be extremely underwhelmed with both the offensive and defensive line hires... Both Raiola and Knighton, prior to getting the Nebraska job, have coached at some small schools, and were assistant line coaches in the league for a couple of years.... Not alot of experience at all on the recruiting trail and not much of a track record in player development at the D1 level... I guess we'll have to watch it play out and hope for the best....
 

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
He didn’t recruit these guys but has a really good lineman from Texas committed. He also has two area kids committed who fit Rhule’s crteria. Raiola was dealt a crappy hand but had his patchwork line make gradual improvement. 99.9% of Husker fans don’t know much about the job he’s doing. They see their struggles and pin it all on the coach without any consideration for what the OC calls or having to play guys who should probably not be getting the time they’re getting.
Based on the "types" of OL that Rhule has gone with over the years, it seems like Nouilli, Corcoran, and Piper all fit in his model. It doesn't mean Teddy, Benhart, and Hunter won't be in the lineup, it just means that 3 guys already fit the physical bill.
 

Truewooper

Senior
Jun 1, 2022
1,576
600
113
3 things:
1. the o-line did get a little bit better by the end of the year.

2. Not sure but I feel like in camp SF was calling the shots of how he trained his guys (purely speculation)

3. Strength and conditioning will actually not be garbage.

Bonus: Matt Rhule knows o-line. Not going to keep someone bad at coaching just to say he did.
 
Last edited:
Dec 4, 2007
2,397
314
0
My 2 cents. Maybe Raiola's hands were tied with the way he could develop players with little to no physical contact in the beginning. His best linemen were out for the season and working with youth. The OC did little to nothing to help with playcalling. There were moments when the line did perform when an identity of running was given. MR has coached both lines so I think he knows what he wants.
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,982
0
I trust Rhule knows a thing or two about the OL and the DL and line development is a thing he emphasizes. So we'll see what happens whoever is the OL coach.
 

HuskerDana_rivals188993

All-Conference
Oct 14, 2007
7,239
2,167
0
Tough to make chicken salad out of chicken poop. Raiola took over a line that lost its best player to the draft and was so lacking in depth that they took in a couple very marginal transfers. Then there's the fact that he was teaching new techniques in a new offense under a head coach who would not let them go live contact more than a few times in the preseason. Hell, how many 3 win programs learning a new offense play touch football in their spring game?
Ha ha, Dean called the s*it poop! Just don't put it out with your boot, Dean! 😆
 

HuskerDana_rivals188993

All-Conference
Oct 14, 2007
7,239
2,167
0
We’ll see. Raiola could still walk on his own even if Rhule wanted to keep him. I just think Raiola got a bad rap from our fans.
Agreed. Maybe he's a good OL coach....or maybe he sucks. It's damn near impossible to make an informed decision on that with the sh*tshow of the previous four years.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,888
13,418
78
Agreed. Maybe he's a good OL coach....or maybe he sucks. It's damn near impossible to make an informed decision on that with the sh*tshow of the previous four years.
His resume is the kind that Rhule likes to hire. Rhule has coached the position. He can get Raiola up to speed quickly on how he wants his guys coached. It isn’t rocket science.
 

9and4_rivals188421

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2013
4,216
1,686
0
Once he finishes the TPS reports, he's out of there, with or without the stapler.
 

king_kong_

Redshirt
Nov 3, 2021
24,413
4
0
Agreed. Maybe he's a good OL coach....or maybe he sucks. It's damn near impossible to make an informed decision on that with the sh*tshow of the previous four years.
Don’t forget the sh*tshow he came from, too

If he can fully cleanse himself of the Bears stench, he will be the first
 

HuskerDana_rivals188993

All-Conference
Oct 14, 2007
7,239
2,167
0
His resume is the kind that Rhule likes to hire. Rhule has coached the position. He can get Raiola up to speed quickly on how he wants his guys coached. It isn’t rocket science.
Yep. He may have recognized something in Raiola or his vision he really likes. It also might not hurt that he just may still be a bridge to his nephews.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,888
13,418
78
Based on the "types" of OL that Rhule has gone with over the years, it seems like Nouilli, Corcoran, and Piper all fit in his model. It doesn't mean Teddy, Benhart, and Hunter won't be in the lineup, it just means that 3 guys already fit the physical bill.
I won’t be surprised if Benhardt walks
 

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
Rhule also has a budget to work with and a list of targets. MJ out of the picture changes things and probably priorities. Also, maybe his top choices turned him down or aren't available. At any rate, if he didn't think he has something to offer, he wouldn't keep him.
 

realHuskerDrew

All-Conference
Jun 12, 2001
13,138
3,690
81
Between Rhule and his staff, there will be plenty of support in helping Raiola incorporate Rhule's training for the OL. There's no doubt in my mind that Rhule believes the new S & C will impact the current OLmen we already have, not including any others that join through the recruits, portal, or JUCO's.

It also could be an issue with assistant budgets. Raiola is pretty cheap so that free's up more money to throw at a DC or other position coaches.

Rhule probably hasn't spent more than 3.5 million of the 7M allotted for staff members. That would allow 3.5 million yet to be spent on a TE coach, DC, LB coach, and WR coach.

Figure less than 2M for the TE, LB, and WR coach and still leaves 1.5M for a DC.
Already been reported that Satterfield will be OC and also coach the TEs.

So even more money will be available.
 

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
Already been reported that Satterfield will be OC and also coach the TEs.

So even more money will be available.
Nice.

Maybe up to 1.5M available for DC and a little more for a higher quality position coach.
Even if this is in bad taste, Mickey probably fashioned himself as close to 1M for his services when a high-quality WR coach should be in the 750-800K range.