Any idea why Rhule almost didn't happen?

Antwill

All-Conference
Dec 18, 2004
4,457
1,089
113
I'm trying to understand how Carolina was part of the negotiations? Wouldn't anything we paid Rhule decrease their obligation to him and wouldn't they be happy with that?

I can understand if they would have objected to him doing what Mike Riley did to us by taking an assistant job back at OSU for $50K/year after we fired him and continue to stick us with paying him almost all of his annual buyout. Maybe they were playing hard ball and saying that unless we paid him X amount, they weren't going to let him out of his contract to take another job? His contract with them must have given them some kind of say so over him taking a new job.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,886
13,414
78
I'm trying to understand how Carolina was part of the negotiations? Wouldn't anything we paid Rhule decrease their obligation to him and wouldn't they be happy with that?

I can understand if they would have objected to him doing what Mike Riley did to us by taking an assistant job back at OSU for $50K/year after we fired him and continue to stick us with paying him almost all of his annual buyout. Maybe they were playing hard ball and saying that unless we paid him X amount, they weren't going to let him out of his contract to take another job? His contract with them must have given them some kind of say so over him taking a new job.
Seems weird to me too but somehow they had some say in his contract.
 

61bigredfan

Redshirt
Oct 9, 2015
1,136
0
0
IIRC Carolina was obligated to pay $8.8 million per year for the next 4-5 years As his contract was guaranteed. But obligation would be lessened by the amount he was payed in his next job with a stipulation that he was paid at market value so Carolina wasn’t stuck with the whole bill for his next job. As Saban’s Base salary is “only” 9.9 million per year there may have been a disagreement about what market value is for a very good, but not Sabin level coach. Somehow Alberts came up with a compromise plan that satisfied everyone (Rhule said Trev is really creative). Another guess but I’m assuming that involves a Nebraska booster(s) that expects a skybox with a better view next year…
 

maplesyrup95

All-Conference
Nov 26, 2014
1,675
1,064
0
I'm trying to understand how Carolina was part of the negotiations? Wouldn't anything we paid Rhule decrease their obligation to him and wouldn't they be happy with that?

I can understand if they would have objected to him doing what Mike Riley did to us by taking an assistant job back at OSU for $50K/year after we fired him and continue to stick us with paying him almost all of his annual buyout. Maybe they were playing hard ball and saying that unless we paid him X amount, they weren't going to let him out of his contract to take another job? His contract with them must have given them some kind of say so over him taking a new job.

If I am reading between the lines correctly, much of it had to do with David Teller and the Panthers contract, who was still on the hook to pay Rhule $34 million with a special contract clause if he was fired. I have a feeling that it made it really difficult for Rhule’s agent to swing a 7-year deal vs 8-year deal.

In his first 4 years at Nebraska, Rhule will make $5.5m, $6.5m, $7.5m, then $8.5m totaling at $28 million. The Panthers definitely played hard ball with some kind of “market value” clause, as mentioned above. And someone can correct me if I’m wrong but it looks like the Panthers only will have to pay Rhule $6 million.
 

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
NU should want a big assistant pool. Just as important as the HC salary.
 

mgbreeze

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2004
10,203
3,740
113
I'm guessing it had to do with Carolina's willingness to contest the "market rate" term in their contract and whether we were attempting to backload any of the salary. There also had to be a negotiation between Nebraska and Carolina because I could see both sides wanting a compromise that ends up with neither paying the full freight and Rhule getting more than he would've had he just sat out. Will be interesting when the details of the contract are known.
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,982
0
I'm guessing it had to do with Carolina's willingness to contest the "market rate" term in their contract and whether we were attempting to backload any of the salary. There also had to be a negotiation between Nebraska and Carolina because I could see both sides wanting a compromise that ends up with neither paying the full freight and Rhule getting more than he would've had he just sat out. Will be interesting when the details of the contract are known.
The details of the contract pretty much are already known.
 

mgbreeze

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2004
10,203
3,740
113
The details of the contract pretty much are already known.
The specific details of annual pay? Is any of the salary backloaded? I'm just wondering if we're paying him less than $8m/per the first 4 years. If so, there was negotiation on that with Carolina.
 

tro80

Senior
Nov 17, 2014
1,041
534
106
I don’t think any of us will know until the OWH cartoon story is released
 
Feb 17, 2008
1,938
410
0
The specific details of annual pay? Is any of the salary backloaded? I'm just wondering if we're paying him less than $8m/per the first 4 years. If so, there was negotiation on that with Carolina.
According to an article on the OWH, the back loaded salary was the issue. It didn't go into a lot of detail, but it looks like the problem was as you mentioned above, i.e. getting the Panthers happy without covering all their costs.
 

Winston Smith 84

Redshirt
May 15, 2022
233
0
0
The Panthers still owed him $40 million at the time of his firing. They had already paid $6 million by the time Trev hired him, so they still owed $34 million. So they will pay him another $6 million and will have paid him $34 million total for 2 1/3 seasons of work.
 

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,239
2,439
113
According to an article on the OWH, the back loaded salary was the issue. It didn't go into a lot of detail, but it looks like the problem was as you mentioned above, i.e. getting the Panthers happy without covering all their costs.
Why do the Panthers have to be happy with our deal with Rhule?

Maybe they can, but how could Carolina block any deal Nebraska makes with Rhule?
 
Feb 17, 2008
1,938
410
0
Why do the Panthers have to be happy with our deal with Rhule?

Maybe they can, but how could Carolina block any deal Nebraska makes with Rhule?
They are entitled to reduce their payout by Rhule's market value if he accepts new employment. Since they were paying him $8.8 million, they will say that is market value (and hard to argue that it isn't at least close). So unless they sign off on any deal that pays Rhule less than $8.8 million/year, Rhule runs the risk that they won't cover any shortfall claiming that he entered into a below market contract. NU wants to backload the salary, so he wouldn't get $8.8 for the first 3- 4 years. It looks like there was a compromise and the Panthers agreed to cover a relatively small amount of his salary.
 

Antwill

All-Conference
Dec 18, 2004
4,457
1,089
113
They are entitled to reduce their payout by Rhule's market value if he accepts new employment. Since they were paying him $8.8 million, they will say that is market value (and hard to argue that it isn't at least close). So unless they sign off on any deal that pays Rhule less than $8.8 million/year, Rhule runs the risk that they won't cover any shortfall claiming that he entered into a below market contract. NU wants to backload the salary, so he wouldn't get $8.8 for the first 3- 4 years. It looks like there was a compromise and the Panthers agreed to cover a relatively small amount of his salary.
I think that's it.

We evidently didn't have that clause in Mike Riley's contract when he took that assistant coaching job at OSU for $50K/year.