Really doubt it coming off a 4-8 season. But we could work ourselves into the rankings pretty quickly.We will be top 25 pre-season IMO, 4-2 in the last 6, should have been 7-5 overall if 3 or 4 plays would have been made.
Did you happen to notice how much 21 has improved theough the course of the year? Seems you may have missed it.D without Lamar Jackson alone next year will be about 100% better.
Wrong. We will still have a bad defensive coordinator that will give up a lot of points. .
Did you happen to notice how much 21 has improved theough the course of the year? Seems you may have missed it.
You either didn’t watch it don’t know ****. Maybe both. Lamar was an easy target last year and early this year, but there are many Husker fans who can’t seem to change their narrative when things change.If that's improvement, God help us . . .
D without Lamar Jackson alone next year will be about 100% better.
I won't concede the Osu game. I do not see OSU getting any better, they may be worse.S. Alabama - w
CU - W
NIU - W
Illinois - W (crack top 25)
OSU - L
Northwestern- W
Minn - W
Indiana - W
Purdue - W
Wisconsin - W
Maryland - W
Iowa -W
11-1, future is bright!!!
Favorable schedule for sure but I don't think 11-1 with our defense. Put me down for 8-4.
Stop baggin on the OL, They made Iowa's DL their little ***** in the 4th which is the quarter that matters most when all is said and done and paved the way for 160 or so Total Offense and 15 pts against the 8th ranked Total D in the nation, so just stop!I like the optimism, and I'm sure there will be some improvement from just being in year 2 of the same system.
But the two glaring weaknesses (OL play and front 7 vs run) just dont seem like they will be fixed completely in one offseason. I do think they can be improved, but it's going to be almost the exact same guys playing those spots on D, and at OT.
Is tony fair an early enrollee? And that OT from Minnesota? Need somebody who can get to the QB, just not seeing it next year unless some guys make really big jumps.
Stop baggin on the OL, The made Iowa's DL their little ***** in the 4th which is the quarter that matters most when all is said and done!
It wasn't the O that lost the game. it was a blown coverage on that 4th and 8. Read the rest of that post you quoted on. The O recovered from it's miscues.What matters most is the final score. I shouldn't have to explain it to you but that is how sports work.
I like the optimism, and I'm sure there will be some improvement from just being in year 2 of the same system.
But the two glaring weaknesses (OL play and front 7 vs run) just dont seem like they will be fixed completely in one offseason. I do think they can be improved, but it's going to be almost the exact same guys playing those spots on D, and at OT.
Is tony fair an early enrollee? And that OT from Minnesota? Need somebody who can get to the QB, just not seeing it next year unless some guys make really big jumps.
It wasn't the O that lost the game. it was a blown coverage on that 4th and 8. Read the rest of that post you quoted on. The O recovered from it's miscues.
Favorable schedule for sure but I don't think 11-1 with our defense. Put me down for 8-4.
I'm not conceding any game next year. That doesn't mean I think we go 12-0, but I don't see any game next year that seems unwinnable.I won't concede the Osu game. I do not see OSU getting any better, they may be worse.
If by bright spots you mean running down the field waving your arms and NEVER looking for the ball, then yeah, he and Bootle both do that.Wrong, we need him big time, he and Bootle are the 2 bright spots on D.
Anyone making a prediction for next year should also have to post what they predicted this year to give us all perspective.S. Alabama - w
CU - W
NIU - W
Illinois - W (crack top 25)
OSU - L
Northwestern- W
Minn - W
Indiana - W
Purdue - W
Wisconsin - W
Maryland - W
Iowa -W
11-1, future is bright!!!