Deontai Williams

Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
There's no reason that 86th guy has to be a reach. Frost should probably already even know at this point there's going to be a lot of attrition from now until fall of next year. We could recruit 30 guys this year and I still think we'd be under the roster limit by fall next year. This staff should already know we need 10 + more quality recruits this year. There's no reason for any of them to be reaches.

Except they can't recruit that many because the Big Ten has a cap of 28
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
Some of these guys on the offensive line, especially ones who've been here for a few years and haven't pushed for playing time on a historically bad Oline are going to be candidates for attrition. That leaves room for both a couple more jucos and freshman.

Who has been here for a few years? Gaylord, the back up tackle? Everyone else is currently a sophomore or younger.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
7 of the top 10 return, 4 of them are at OT. Wilson, Raridon and little Farniok in the middle. Plus Hunter Miller.
Big Farniok would be better at OG according to several people I trust. Austin has said that his depth at OT is razor thin and that we're in trouble there if we have an injury at OT. We have some viable options at guard. Not so much at tackle. Don't get me wrong, I think some of the young guys we have can be good players down the road. I just think that IF you think you can upgrade your talent pool especially at OT via the JUCO ranks you do it and worry about your numbers later. As we've seen this past off season, that scholarship distribution can change pretty quickly when a guy finds out he's 4th team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldjar07

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
Big Farniok would be better at OG according to several people I trust. Austin has said that his depth at OT is razor thin and that we're in trouble there if we have an injury at OT. We have some viable options at guard. Not so much at tackle. Don't get me wrong, I think some of the young guys we have can be good players down the road. I just think that IF you think you can upgrade your talent pool especially at OT via the JUCO ranks you do it and worry about your numbers later. As we've seen this past off season, that scholarship distribution can change pretty quickly when a guy finds out he's 4th team.

If we can get that JUCO OT from GCCC (Olaseni), we can move Farniok inside. It would be even better, if he could play LT, so we could move Jaimes back over to the right side. Could have Jaimes and Olaseni at OT, Wilson and Farniok at OG and Bland at C. Would seem to be a much better group, on paper.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
Big Farniok would be better at OG according to several people I trust. Austin has said that his depth at OT is razor thin and that we're in trouble there if we have an injury at OT. We have some viable options at guard. Not so much at tackle. Don't get me wrong, I think some of the young guys we have can be good players down the road. I just think that IF you think you can upgrade your talent pool especially at OT via the JUCO ranks you do it and worry about your numbers later. As we've seen this past off season, that scholarship distribution can change pretty quickly when a guy finds out he's 4th team.

Please let me know the juco Olinemen that are better than what we currently have on the roster.

Everyone expects Bland to come in and start right away, what if he is like Woodyard, Williams, Williams, and Honas, and not better than what is already here.

Everyone thinks Juco, equals starts right away, 4 of the 5 Jucos that came in last year, aren't really any better than the "scrubs" Pelini and Riley recruited.

OT depth is thin,.,... this year. But you return all 4 for next year.

Gates was better at Guard than Tackle, but if you are one of the best 5 linemen, you play where you are needed, not where you may be your best. If you are thin at Tackle, you don't move a guy from tackle.

Kansas St chases JUCOs every year. No thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Judgeandjury

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
Please let me know the juco Olinemen that are better than what we currently have on the roster.

Everyone expects Bland to come in and start right away, what if he is like Woodyard, Williams, Williams, and Honas, and not better than what is already here.

Everyone thinks Juco, equals starts right away, 4 of the 5 Jucos that came in last year, aren't really any better than the "scrubs" Pelini and Riley recruited.

OT depth is thin,.,... this year. But you return all 4 for next year.

Gates was better at Guard than Tackle, but if you are one of the best 5 linemen, you play where you are needed, not where you may be your best. If you are thin at Tackle, you don't move a guy from tackle.

Kansas St chases JUCOs every year. No thanks.
You move a guy from tackle back inside IF you can recruit a guy who is a better tackle than him and in Farniok's case that may be possible. That said, I don't disagree with your sentiment about going heavy JUCO's every year. I think right now,Frost needs to do what he needs to do to field a competitive roster while he builds high school linemen. We are in dire need of OTs and I don't see them on the roster. Using a JUCO big fella is a GREAT way to stretch your scholarship years IF you think he can play right away. That way you don't have him eating a scholarship for 2-3 years before he's ready to play. Ideally you recruit a true freshman who maybe can play right away or maybe only needs a redshirt year to get ready but that's the exception rather than the rule.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
I just went through 247 Juco linemen who aren't already committed.

Exactly one has a Nebraska offer, Bamidele Olaseni from Garden City.

So either Austin and Frost are cool with what they have, the talent at the Juco level isn't better than what they have on the roster, or they agree with me that Juco's are great to fill one hole.

There is even a player from Arizona Western, that plays with Bland, no offer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
What does that have to do with having the ability to develop the 6 soph and freshmen current players on the 2 deep and recruiting high school players to take their spots over the next 3 years? Cavanaugh isn't here anymore. The bodies are reshaped, or so we are told, the weight room is being used, Austin is coaching the team now.

How many of the JUCO players that were brought in, by Frost for this season, are playing right now? You seem to believe that an influx of JUCO linemen are going to automatically fix the issue. No guarantees.

Sure, Juco anything is a big risk. A bigger risk than freshmen of course. But it's possible we could get one or two that could be a OLine upgrade "now". It would be hugely worth it to cut a couple WR or whatever recruits to possibly get a road grader or two. Without huge improvement with our OLine we're simply not going to have a good run or pass game anyway.

Geesh, can't you see we need serious, serious help? We simply can't block anybody.....what could possibly be a higher priority?
 

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
Please let me know the juco Olinemen that are better than what we currently have on the roster.

Everyone expects Bland to come in and start right away, what if he is like Woodyard, Williams, Williams, and Honas, and not better than what is already here.

Everyone thinks Juco, equals starts right away, 4 of the 5 Jucos that came in last year, aren't really any better than the "scrubs" Pelini and Riley recruited.

OT depth is thin,.,... this year. But you return all 4 for next year.

Gates was better at Guard than Tackle, but if you are one of the best 5 linemen, you play where you are needed, not where you may be your best. If you are thin at Tackle, you don't move a guy from tackle.

Kansas St chases JUCOs every year. No thanks.

No one is saying take the "JUCO" way every year. Just "one" year.......we have the need to say the least.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
I just went through 247 Juco linemen who aren't already committed.

Exactly one has a Nebraska offer, Bamidele Olaseni from Garden City.

So either Austin and Frost are cool with what they have, the talent at the Juco level isn't better than what they have on the roster, or they agree with me that Juco's are great to fill one hole.

There is even a player from Arizona Western, that plays with Bland, no offer.
The key is "are they better than what we have?" and clearly Austin doesn't think they are. That doesn't mean we don't have a need. It just means we can't fill it from the JUCO ranks at that specific position right now. Finding O linemen who can move like the guys Ohio and Bama have is not an easy task and I've been saying for years we need to build OTs from high school TEs, JMHO and that takes time. It would be fun to see us do that from walk on TEs who don't cost us a scholarship while under construction. Give me a little bit undersized high school O linemen who can move any day over a big dude with heavy feet. We can make em bigger. It's tough to make em quicker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Judgeandjury
Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
The key is "are they better than what we have?" and clearly Austin doesn't think they are. That doesn't mean we don't have a need. It just means we can't fill it from the JUCO ranks at that specific position right now. Finding O linemen who can move like the guys Ohio and Bama have is not an easy task and I've been saying for years we need to build OTs from high school TEs, JMHO and that takes time. It would be fun to see us do that from walk on TEs who don't cost us a scholarship while under construction. Give me a little bit undersized high school O linemen who can move any day over a big dude with heavy feet. We can make em bigger. It's tough to make em quicker.

Then what is the argument? If the fix isn’t at the JUCO level, why is everyone clamoring for JUCO linemen? Multiple at that?
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
Then what is the argument? If the fix isn’t at the JUCO level, why is everyone clamoring for JUCO linemen? Multiple at that?
Well we have offered at least one and I hope he gets one because he looks like a stud. I'm not panicked that's for sure like some. IMO, our O line problems have more to do with execution of the scheme than it does the slightly deficient talent level of some of the guys. I'm hoping another year in the system and maybe some immediate help from at least one JUCO will get us to a better spot. Excuse me if my post-op stupor perception was that you were arguing against all JUCO O linemen. Versed and hydrocodone are wonderful drugs.:D We should start a new poll. How many of you have posted while under the influence of narcotics?.yes or no. SoFlHusker need not answer.:oops:
 
  • Like
Reactions: barney44

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,465
2,006
113
Except they can't recruit that many because the Big Ten has a cap of 28
And we're likely going to come up short on the roster limit by 2019 fall camp if we recruit 28. Unless all that talk about him not wanting players who don't want to be here is BS, there's going to be a lot of attrition in the next year.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
And we're likely going to come up short on the roster limit by 2019 fall camp if we recruit 28. Unless all that talk about him not wanting players who don't want to be here is BS, there's going to be a lot of attrition in the next year.

Nope some walkons will get it to 85
 
  • Like
Reactions: Judgeandjury
Aug 18, 2016
16,632
10,906
113
Well we have offered at least one and I hope he gets one because he looks like a stud. I'm not panicked that's for sure like some. IMO, our O line problems have more to do with execution of the scheme than it does the slightly deficient talent level of some of the guys. I'm hoping another year in the system and maybe some immediate help from at least one JUCO will get us to a better spot. Excuse me if my post-op stupor perception was that you were arguing against all JUCO O linemen. Versed and hydrocodone are wonderful drugs.:D We should start a new poll. How many of you have posted while under the influence of narcotics?.yes or no. SoFlHusker need not answer.:oops:


I don’t have a problem with a JUCO OL every now and again. I even posted that I think taking some Juco oline this year would be good, as long as the fit into the RS Fr or Soph class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
I don’t have a problem with a JUCO OL every now and again. I even posted that I think taking some Juco oline this year would be good, as long as the fit into the RS Fr or Soph class.
You know the other factor right now is that we're not even to the half way point of the JUCO season yet. There could be some guys who show up this year yet that would be worth signing. Bottomline, I trust Frost and Austin to do the best they can and I think that eventually that will be good enough. That's all I can ask.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,465
2,006
113
Nope some walkons will get it to 85
I'm not sure Frost wants that. Like was mentioned earlier, he gave a scholarship to Vaha and the corner who was on the team for a month before he gave one to a walk on. I don't think leaving room to give scholarships to walk ons is a big priority for him.
 

barney44

All-American
Oct 2, 2005
185,597
5,623
0
IMO, our O line problems have more to do with execution of the scheme than it does the slightly deficient talent level of some of the guys.

I don’t know how next season will be, or the end of this season for that matter but if we’re like this a couple of years down the road then I think we have a problem. Right now I think we’re going to need some patience for the reason you mentioned. I think we’re sitting somewhere in between by having some guys who are fully capaple as well as some deficiencies. Time in the scheme is the fix and then I think we can evaluate how good these guys actually are. We’re just a mess on the football field right now and until the team gets it any one player will not change the situation.

Get our execution to a much better level and maybe we’ll be surprised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
I don’t know how next season will be, or the end of this season for that matter but if we’re like this a couple of years down the road then I think we have a problem. Right now I think we’re going to need some patience for the reason you mentioned. I think we’re sitting somewhere in between by having some guys who are fully capaple as well as some deficiencies. Time in the scheme is the fix and then I think we can evaluate how good these guys actually are. We’re just a mess on the football field right now and until the team gets it any one player will not change the situation.

Get our execution to a much better level and maybe we’ll be surprised.
Well Milton would and UCF's center would be a good start at fixing things....but no one recruit is going to fix it. I'm hopeful after listening to Zatechka that we will see steady improvement over the next season and a half.
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,188
4,837
91
And what happens when you have half of your oline finish their eligibility after 2020 and have no one to replace them?

You can't have it both ways, you can't say this is a slow process, everyone needs to have patience, then go and make quick fixes that kill the future depth. Either this is a quick fix or it isn't. But you can't make quick fix decisions for a slow process problem. You will never catch up.
Weighing in on Tuco’s side. Next year NU will have four scholarship Oline Juniors and will rely on three to play a lot, with the possibility of getting something out the Senior Gaylord. Barnett should get him s degree and move on. They hope Bland can give them some help. A three for two guy would be a nice find actually, only Bando and Sichterman are now in that cohort. Get a guy in and RS him. Maybe find an athletic guy with a nice frame and let Duval go to work.
But this is a build that will take several years. Recruiting misses/busts plus poor development in multiple years. The Stache got murdered on this board and yet he coached all Americans and guys who are in the league. My defense of Cav was completely misplaced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,465
2,006
113
Weighing in on Tuco’s side. Next year NU will have four scholarship Oline Juniors and will rely on three to play a lot, with the possibility of getting something out the Senior Gaylord. Barnett should get him s degree and move on. They hope Bland can give them some help. A three for two guy would be a nice find actually, only Bando and Sichterman are now in that cohort. Get a guy in and RS him. Maybe find an athletic guy with a nice frame and let Duval go to work.
But this is a build that will take several years. Recruiting misses/busts plus poor development in multiple years. The Stache got murdered on this board and yet he coached all Americans and guys who are in the league. My defense of Cav was completely misplaced.
Barney Cotton was a much better coach than he ever got credit for. We never had great passing protection under him, but our OL was able to physically dominate most teams if we were committed to the run. I guess the other problem is our OL would inexcusably not show up to play in certain games. But when they did show up, we actually had pretty good line play under Cotton.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
Weighing in on Tuco’s side. Next year NU will have four scholarship Oline Juniors and will rely on three to play a lot, with the possibility of getting something out the Senior Gaylord. Barnett should get him s degree and move on. They hope Bland can give them some help. A three for two guy would be a nice find actually, only Bando and Sichterman are now in that cohort. Get a guy in and RS him. Maybe find an athletic guy with a nice frame and let Duval go to work.
But this is a build that will take several years. Recruiting misses/busts plus poor development in multiple years. The Stache got murdered on this board and yet he coached all Americans and guys who are in the league. My defense of Cav was completely misplaced.
I keep forgetting about Gaylord. When asked by an outgoing player last year who we should watch this year on the O line, he said Gaylord. Yet I don't hear his name much.
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,382
15,516
113
For how well Neal knows the defense, he sure doesn't play like it, and he's awfully slow too. I haven't been impressed with him at all. Aaron Williams has done some good things though. I'd like to see the Williams show at safety.


Neal isn't very fast. He just knows the defense inside and out. He plays the game the way the coaches want him to. I think that is part of the deal as well . That said A Williams has been our best safety and I think D Williams has impressed more than the others with much less PT. My guess is that he is the most talented and is just behind a bit in knowing the defense. That said if/when he does he could easily become the best of the bunch. He's more athletic and faster than all of them.


Holla
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,425
12,841
78
Neal isn't very fast. He just knows the defense inside and out. He plays the game the way the coaches want him to. I think that is part of the deal as well . That said A Williams has been our best safety and I think D Williams has impressed more than the others with much less PT. My guess is that he is the most talented and is just behind a bit in knowing the defense. That said if/when he does he could easily become the best of the bunch. He's more athletic and faster than all of them.


Holla
Good to hear from you oh great one. Weigh in more often when you can pry yourself away from the elite board..