He's a different kind of cat, but good for him on his win last night! Not so good for his counterpart at Arizona.Yeah...people made so much fun of that hire and right now it is looking brilliant.
People laughed for months at the hire. Do we know if MSU was actually good?Yeah...people made so much fun of that hire and right now it is looking brilliant.
MSU seems over hyped this year. They also struggled with Utah St last week.People laughed for months at the hire. Do we know if MSU was actually good?
If anyone is overreacting, it's you. Edwards was expected to be an immediate failure, but that has not been the case after two games, including a game with a ranked team. What's wrong with pointing that out?Yep-it's all settled now, and forever. Herm Edwards was a brilliant hire because he pulled off one upset. No other game he coaches will ever matter. It's done, finished. Might as well hand him the coach of the year now, because it is all settled.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly people are ready to declare coaches or teams successes or failures based on a game or two. I mean, time and time and time again we have seen somebody pull off an upset or two(Ron Prince, anyone?), and people immediately declare them a great coach-and then they end up failing. And we see somebody start slow(Nick Saban's first year at Alabama. anyone?) and people are ready to declare them a failure, or at least overrated. And people never learn. Just unbelievable.
Immediate failure? Who said he was going to be an immediate failure? The general consensus was that it was a terrible hire. That does not mean people thought he was going to fail in his first two games. Nobody is a failure or a success after two games nor is anybody ever predicted to be one.If anyone is overreacting, it's you. Edwards was expected to be an immediate failure, but that has not been the case after two games, including a game with a ranked team. What's wrong with pointing that out?
I think MSU has been smoke and mirrors for a few years now.People laughed for months at the hire. Do we know if MSU was actually good?
He's done better than people expected after two games. You are overreacting to those who are giving him some credit. That's all.Immediate failure? Who said he was going to be an immediate failure? The general consensus was that it was a terrible hire. That does not mean people thought he was going to fail in his first two games. Nobody is a failure or a success after two games nor is anybody ever predicted to be one.
WowYep-it's all settled now, and forever. Herm Edwards was a brilliant hire because he pulled off one upset. No other game he coaches will ever matter. It's done, finished. Might as well hand him the coach of the year now, because it is all settled.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly people are ready to declare coaches or teams successes or failures based on a game or two. I mean, time and time and time again we have seen somebody pull off an upset or two(Ron Prince, anyone?), and people immediately declare them a great coach-and then they end up failing. And we see somebody who turns out to be a great success start slow(Nick Saban's first year at Alabama. anyone?) and people are ready to declare them a failure, or at least overrated. And people never learn. Just unbelievable.
Yep-it's all settled now, and forever. Herm Edwards was a brilliant hire because he pulled off one upset. No other game he coaches will ever matter. It's done, finished. Might as well hand him the coach of the year now, because it is all settled.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly people are ready to declare coaches or teams successes or failures based on a game or two. I mean, time and time and time again we have seen somebody pull off an upset or two(Ron Prince, anyone?), and people immediately declare them a great coach-and then they end up failing. And we see somebody who turns out to be a great success start slow(Nick Saban's first year at Alabama. anyone?) and people are ready to declare them a failure, or at least overrated. And people never learn. Just unbelievable.
Beating the perennial powerhouse of UTSA and a Michigan State team that there had already been signs that they may have been overrated is hardly much to crow about, yet. How about we at least wait until the end of October when they will have played Washington, Stanford and USC(and Colorado) and then we'll see how they're doing. If they're still doing well, then I'll give him credit. Until at least then(and really longer than that), I'd hardly consider it a brilliant hire yet.He's done better than people expected after two games. You are overreacting to those who are giving him some credit. That's all.
Lots of people thought he was going to be an immediate failure...Immediate failure? Who said he was going to be an immediate failure? The general consensus was that it was a terrible hire. That does not mean people thought he was going to fail in his first two games. Nobody is a failure or a success after two games nor is anybody ever predicted to be one.
Yep-it's all settled now, and forever. Herm Edwards was a brilliant hire because he pulled off one upset. No other game he coaches will ever matter. It's done, finished. Might as well hand him the coach of the year now, because it is all settled.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly people are ready to declare coaches or teams successes or failures based on a game or two. I mean, time and time and time again we have seen somebody pull off an upset or two(Ron Prince, anyone?), and people immediately declare them a great coach-and then they end up failing. And we see somebody who turns out to be a great success start slow(Nick Saban's first year at Alabama. anyone?) and people are ready to declare them a failure, or at least overrated. And people never learn. Just unbelievable.
Yes, he really is like that!You are not really like this, are you? You really don't get this worked up, do you?
You react like a serial killer would.