Akron says only lodging within "reasonable distance" meant staying at multiple locations which was not ideal for their team. The game will be rescheduled if there is a possibility that it could make either team bowl eligible.
Or we play them and beat them and keep them ineligible.That would really suck if we had to play that game in Dec. so Akron could get bowl eligible.
That would really suck if we had to play that game in Dec. so Akron could get bowl eligible.
Especially if we were 4-7 at the time (NOT THAT I EXPECT THAT OF COURSE).That would really suck if we had to play that game in Dec. so Akron could get bowl eligible.
That is what I thought would happen if both teams need to be Bowl eligible.
It would really suck if we were 5-6 and Akron couldn't play us because they were in the MAC title game.Okay, it would suck assuming our record is anything other than 5-6.
It sounds like just one team would need an attempt at bowl eligibility on the line for the game to happen. That also means a 99% chance that Dec. 1 would be the date since it's likely that bowl eligibility won't be sorted out for either team before then.
It would really suck if we were 5-6 and Akron couldn't play us because they were in the MAC title game.
I wouldn't mind playing Iowa St if it came down to it.It would really suck if we were 5-6 and Akron couldn't play us because they were in the MAC title game.
Maybe. I think it still has to be approved by both schools. IF we don't need it and we didn't pay Akron, it may not happen. On the flip side, IF Akron got paid and we need the game and they don't, don't expect them to come back for free.It sounds like just one team would need an attempt at bowl eligibility on the line for the game to happen. That also means a 99% chance that Dec. 1 would be the date since it's likely that bowl eligibility won't be sorted out for either team before then.
Maybe. I think it still has to be approved by both schools. IF we don't need it and we didn't pay Akron, it may not happen. On the flip side, IF Akron got paid and we need the game and they don't, don't expect them to come back for free.
Good question. Highly doubtful though. Conferences have control over their schools. But non con games is a little more on your own, and terms between the schools involved. NCAA stays out of those things and only looks at compliance and eligibility. Might get talked about in competition committee or something.Wouldn’t the NCAA have something to say about that?
We don’t know what Louisiana Monroe was paid to play FSU, I doubt 1.17 M but they had to go back to Tallahassee first week in December to make up for the cancelled game in September to get their 6 win.
Good question. Highly doubtful though. Conferences have control over their schools. But non con games is a little more on your own, and terms between the schools involved. NCAA stays out of those things and only looks at compliance and eligibility. Might get talked about in competition committee or something.
Maybe. I think it still has to be approved by both schools. IF we don't need it and we didn't pay Akron, it may not happen. On the flip side, IF Akron got paid and we need the game and they don't, don't expect them to come back for free.
It's out of the hands of the NCAA but if it comes down to Nebraska needing a win Delaney can make life miserable for Akron and the MAC if they choose to be butt heads.Good question. Highly doubtful though. Conferences have control over their schools. But non con games is a little more on your own, and terms between the schools involved. NCAA stays out of those things and only looks at compliance and eligibility. Might get talked about in competition committee or something.
It would seem like a better idea to try to schedule a game with an FCS team now and have some certainty rather than gambling that Akron will come through later.It's out of the hands of the NCAA but if it comes down to Nebraska needing a win Delaney can make life miserable for Akron and the MAC if they choose to be butt heads.
Akron and the MAC need B1G money.
It would seem like a better idea to try to schedule a game with an FCS team now and have some certainty rather than gambling that Akron will come through later.
That would be interestingLiberty U and Turner Gill the hot name right now to add a game (they moved up this year but can't play in a bowl).
Would that be an option for our bye week or DecemberLiberty U and Turner Gill the hot name right now to add a game (they moved up this year but can't play in a bowl).
Would that be an option for our bye week or December
Keep us posted if you are hearing moreBoth being looked at, but the bye week is the preference...would take some moving if pieces to make it happen and of course $$$